Deep Sedation in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
PRIORI-AF
Using Deep Sedation vs. Conscious Sedation in Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Intraprocedural Management and Outcome Evaluation
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,334
1 country
16
Brief Summary
The current practice of anesthesia for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (CA) procedure is inconsistent, including general anesthesia, deep sedation, and conscious sedation.Due to the nature of deep sedation, it has been continuously gaining its position as one of the crucial components in standard practices of atrial fibrillation ablation during the last decade. Currently, a considerable number of procedures have been done using conscious sedation. Previous studies explored the benefits obtained from the employment of deep sedation in AF ablation procedures, mainly focused on pain reduction and intra-procedural safety. However, the benefits on long-term rhythmic outcomes, peri-procedural safety as well as benefits on procedural parameters and peri-procedural experiences from patients/ablators/lab staff have yet not to be thoroughly studied. We plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of deep sedation in catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent AF in multiple prospective, i.e., quantified intraprocedural patients / physicians / lab staffs / mapper clinical specialist experiences, and the procedure safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
March 4, 2025
December 1, 2024
2.4 years
February 16, 2025
February 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rhythm outcomes
The primary effectiveness endpoint is the freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/AFL/AT lasting for over 30 seconds) recurrence monitored by ECG, 7-day ambulatory ECG, or equivalent cardiac monitoring from 4th to 12th month (9 months) after the procedure without taking I/III AADs. Patients who had to redo ablation or failed to discontinue I/III AADs after the blanking period are considered as primary endpoint
4-12month post-ablation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Score of patients' intraprocedural experiences
during the CA procedure
Score of ablators', staffs',nurse's intraprocedural experiences
during the CA procedure
respiratory system safety outcome
From the start of sedation to the end of the procedure
Rate of re-ablation acceptances
4-12month post-ablation
Procedure time
during the CA procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
DS group
EXPERIMENTALThe CA procedure will be performed under deep sedation in the study group mainly with propofol for sedation and fentanyl for analgesic
CS group
SHAM COMPARATORThe CA procedure will be performed under conscious sedation in the control group mainly with fentanyl.
Interventions
The deep sedation was inducted using atropine 0.5 mg iv administered 15 min before the procedure to avoid aspiration. In the EP lab, anesthesia preparation is performed, including invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring via puncture of the radial artery or brachial artery. Noninvasive BP monitoring every 5 minutes is also permitted. Subsequently, midazolam 1-2mg or accompanied with propofol 0.3-0.5 mg/kg is administered intravenously at the start of the CA procedure (i.e., femoral vein puncture), and fentanyl 25 µg is administered intravenously. Then, continuous titrated infusion of propofol 0.2-0.5mg/kg/h for anesthesia maintenance throughout the CA procedure. An additional iv fentanyl (25-50 µg) is administrated at the beginning of RF applications. Further boluses or additional drugs are administrated as needed to maintain analgesia during the procedure. The anesthesiologist is responsible for administering anesthesia and administering medication.
This protocol is aimed at analgesia, with local infiltration of lidocaine for femoral vein puncture followed by intravenous administration of fentanyl (1-2 ug/kg/h). The operator determines the dose of fentanyl and midazolam. A midazolam 1-5 mg bolus is administrated before electrical cardioversion is performed or when the patient is nervous.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ● Patients diagnosed with AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing) at 18-75 years old who are eligible for the CA procedure
You may not qualify if:
- has received CA procedure for AF or atrial septal defect repair before enrollment
- left atrial diameter (LAD) ≥55 mm or thrombosis in the left atrium;
- eGFR\<30mL/min/1.73㎡
- a history of cerebrovascular disease within the last three months (including stroke and transient ischemic attack \[TIA\])
- acute or severe systemic infection
- intolerant to sedation or with a history suggestive of sleep apnea
- BMI \> 35 kg/㎡
- has contraindications to procedural sedation or refused to participate in this trial
- Congenital heart disease, thyroid dysfunction, severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh classification B-C), severe coagulation dysfunction (international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.5 or partial activated prothrombin time (APTT) prolonged by ≥ 10 seconds, or plasma prothrombin time (PT) prolonged by ≥ 3 seconds, or fibrinogen (Fib) ≤ 1.5 g/L), or active bleeding
- pregnant women, breastfeeding women or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period, those who have a positive pregnancy test result during the screening period
- life expectancy \< 12 months
- those who have participated in other clinical drug trials within 3 months prior to enrollment
- those who are known to be allergic to any of the ingredients such as lidocaine, propofol, soybeans, peanuts, etc.
- those who, in the judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this clinical study (e.g., not in line with the treatment that the research participants the treatment, research participant compliance, etc.).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (16)
Anhui Provincial Hospital
Hefei, Anhui, 230036, China
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China
NanFang Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
Jiangsu Provincial Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330008, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Dalian, Liaoning, 116011, China
Qingdao Municipal Hospital
Qingdao, Shandong, 266011, China
Shanghai East Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200120, China
Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030001, China
Tianjin Chest Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300010, China
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300050, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China
Sir Rung Rung Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School Of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310016, China
The Affiliated Hospital Of Medical School Of Ningbo University
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315211, China
Related Publications (2)
Grimaldi M, Quadrini F, Caporusso N, Troisi F, Vitulano N, Delmonte V, Di Monaco A. Deep sedation protocol during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel variable-loop biphasic pulsed field ablation catheter. Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9):euad222. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad222.
PMID: 37470452BACKGROUNDBenzoni T, Agarwal A, Cascella M. Procedural Sedation. 2025 Mar 22. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551685/
PMID: 31869149BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yunlong Xia, Ph.D
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The present trial utilized a centralized randomization system (IWRS) to facilitate the competitive enrollment of study participants and treatment randomization grouping. The investigator (anesthesiologist) carries out the given treatment according to the grouping information of the study participants. Throughout the course of the study, the treatment groups were kept blind to the researchers, with the exception of the anesthesiologist, the sponsor, and the study participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2025
First Posted
February 20, 2025
Study Start
March 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
March 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
To protect the privacy of subjects, the study data can be accessed by requesting from the PI.