Comparison of Blood Products Required Using Two Different ROTEM Cut-offs Before Invasive Procedures in Cirrhosis and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) Patients With Severe Coagulopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
934
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Coagulation system in cirrhotics patients is a fragile state , which is rebalanced hemostasis. Standard tests (INR/aPTT) stop measuring at first stage of coagulation ,when the clot first form. VETs measure the whole process such as ROTEM, TEG and comparing these two tests to assess for transfusion of blood products for invasive procedures. . ROTEM provides information both on anti coagulant and procoagulant status where as conventional tests provide only anti coagulant status Invasive procedures can be low risk or high risk or Non surgical vs surgical, Procedure related bleed occurs in 7% of patients with cirrhosis and associated with higher 28 day mortality. MELD, CTP ,AKI , SEPSIS increase the risk of procedure related bleed. Hence for invasive procedures investigator is using relaxing threshold for blood product transfusion in cirrhosis, ACLF patients. As use of ROTEM when compared to conventional tests reduces the need for blood transfusion. Investigator want to proceed with further relaxation of cutoff values of Coagulation parameters and use High cutoff vs low cut off for blood transfusion need.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedJuly 1, 2025
January 1, 2025
12 months
January 17, 2025
June 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with reduction in the amount of total components transfused in high cut off ROTEM compared to low cut off ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF patients.
High Cutoff defined as need of low blood transfusion products (CT-\>100sec,MCF\<25,CLI30\<40%,MCF -FIB\<6mm) and Low Cut off defined as (CT -\>80sec, MCF\<35, CLI30\<50%,MCF-FIB\<6mm)
Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Assess the impact of ROTEM on transfusion requirements.
Day 28
Evaluate the incidence of bleeding events post procedure in Low cutoff.
Day 28
Mortality related with procedural bleeding in both groups.
Day 28
Proportion of the patient requiring procedural based treatment that is number of blood transfusions, angioembolization after post procedural bleed.
Day 28
To compare the rate of transfusion reactions in relaxed ROTEM vs standard ROTEM in cirrhosis and ACLF.
Day 28
Study Arms (3)
Low Cut Off
ACTIVE COMPARATOREXTEM CT\>80sec, CL130\<50% FIBTEM- Mcf\>8
High Cut Off
EXPERIMENTALEXTEM CT\>100sec, CL130\<40% FIBTEM- Mcf\<6
On demand
NO INTERVENTIONNo pre procedure blood products transfusions will be given. Transfusions will be given after the procedure if any bleeding complications occur
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cirrhosis and ACLF ( as per definition)
- Planned to undergo invasive procedures
- Severe Coagulopathy- INR\>2.0 or Platelets \<30k or Fibrinogen\<100mg/dl .
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing bleeding
- Bleeding in past 48 hours before procedure
- Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy ( stopped \< 7 days before)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences (ILBS)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2025
First Posted
February 18, 2025
Study Start
March 19, 2025
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01