Investigation of the Mechanisms of the Gut-brain Axis in Binge Eating and Obesity.
Gut2Brain
Gut2Brain: Investigation of the Mechanisms of the Gut-brain Axis in Binge Eating and Obesity
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Binge Eating Disorder (BED) is a recently recognized eating disorder, characterized by recurrent episodes of overeating with a loss of control. Highly comorbid with obesity, BED is associated with poor outcomes in weight loss treatments and presents unique challenges due to its distinct neuro-psycho-biological mechanisms, which remain poorly understood. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (MGBA) is a bidirectional communication system linking the gut microbiota with the central nervous system, that plays a critical role in regulating appetite, mood, and eating behavior. Dysregulations in MGBA may contribute to the development and maintenance of BED, offering a novel framework for understanding its complex mechanisms and identifying new therapeutic targets. Psychobiotics -pre-, pro-, or symbiotics that modulate the microbiota- emerge as a promising treatment strategy to address BED symptoms by influencing MGBA activity. The goal of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to investigate the role of psychobiotics in modulating the gut-brain axis and improving binge eating in adults, with a particular focus on evaluating these effects independently of obesity status. This project stands out for its comprehensive approach to understanding BED, integrating psychological, neurofunctional, hormonal, and microbiota factors that contribute to this complex disorder. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What specific alterations in the MGBA pathways are associated with BED?
- Can psychobiotic supplementation effectively reverse microbiota alterations and modulate MGBA activity, ultimately improving BED symptoms? Researchers will compare participants receiving psychobiotics to those receiving a look-alike substance that contains no drug (a placebo) to evaluate whether psychobiotics impact endocrine hormones, neurofunction, psychological and behavioral factors related to eating regulation, and BED symptoms. Participants will:
- Undergo an assessment protocol that includes microbiota sampling, blood tests for hormone analysis, neurofunctional evaluations, and psychological/behavioral assessments before and after the psychobiotics/ placebo intervention.
- Take psychobiotics or a placebo daily for 12 weeks and receive well-being monitoring
- Participate in follow-up visits three months after the intervention to monitor changes in BED symptoms and related parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Apr 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2030
March 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.4 years
January 17, 2025
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Gut Microbiota outcomes - Gut-Bacteria Composition
Stool samples from each participant will be fermented by the prebiotic to allow direct comparison of individual alterations in vitro and in vivo of the microbiome. Changes in gut-bacteria composition and its adhesion into the mucus layer will be analyzed.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Gut Microbiota outcomes - Molecules released by the gut-bacteria
Stool samples from each participant will be fermented by the prebiotic to allow direct comparison of individual alterations in vitro and in vivo of the microbiome. Molecules released by the bacteria, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), dopamine, and serotonin, which modify host metabolism and central regulation of appetite directly via vagal stimulation or indirectly through immune-neuroendocrine mechanisms, will be traced during fermentations.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Psycho-behavioral outcomes - Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-21
Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-21 (TFEQ-21): assesses psychopathology and behaviors related to eating disorders, generating 3 subscales: emotional eating; compulsive eating; restraint eating.
Change measures: baseline, end of treatment at 12 weeks and follow-up at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Psycho-behavioral outcomes - Eating Expectancy Inventory
\- The Eating Expectancy Inventory (EEI): evaluates cognitive expectations regarding eating
Change measures: baseline, end of treatment at 12 weeks and follow-up at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Psycho-behavioral outcomes - Negative urgency subscale
Negative urgency subscale from the Urgency, Premeditation, Perseverance, and Sensation Seeking scales (UPPS): assesses the tendency to act rashly/impulsively when experiencing negative emotions.
Change measures: baseline, end of treatment at 12 weeks and follow-up at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Psycho-behavioral outcomes - Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS): self-report measure developed to assess difficulties in emotional dysregulation.
Change measures: baseline, end of treatment at 12 weeks and follow-up at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Psycho-behavioral outcomes - Distress Tolerance Scale
The Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS): scale that assesses ability to experience, tolerate, and function in a context of emotional distress
Change measures: baseline, end of treatment at 12 weeks and follow-up at 12 weeks post-treatment.
Neurofunctioning outcomes - Default mode network
Neurofunctioning will be assessed through rs-fMRI. Specifically, we aim to compare the resting-state networks (RSNs), such as the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), the meso/paralimbic network (MPN), and the executive network (EN) across the three groups. The DMN is involved in self-referential processing, which includes monitoring the external environment as well as physical and emotional states.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Neurofunctioning outcomes - Salience network
Neurofunctioning will be assessed through rs-fMRI. Specifically, we aim to compare the resting-state networks (RSNs), such as the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), the meso/paralimbic network (MPN), and the executive network (EN) across the three groups. The DMN is involved in self-referential processing, which includes monitoring the external environment as well as physical and emotional states. The SN is involved in detecting the salience of stimuli, integrating emotional arousal, food, and reward processing.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Neurofunctioning outcomes - Meso/Paralimbic network
Neurofunctioning will be assessed through rs-fMRI. Specifically, we aim to compare the resting-state networks (RSNs), such as the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), the meso/paralimbic network (MPN), and the executive network (EN) across the three groups. The MPN is involved in processing emotional information and interoceptive awareness.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Neurofunctioning outcomes - Executive network
Neurofunctioning will be assessed through rs-fMRI. Specifically, we aim to compare the resting-state networks (RSNs), such as the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SN), the meso/paralimbic network (MPN), and the executive network (EN) across the three groups. The EN is involved in cognitive control and inhibitory processes, such as the termination of food consumption
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Ghrelin
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: * Ghrelin is an orexigenic hormone with stimulatory effects on appetite and food intake.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: * Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) have an anorexigenic effect and are thought to contribute to impaired satiation and binge eating tendencies. GLP-1 has been the target of novel therapeutics for weight loss, but few studies have examined its impact on BED.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Peptide YY
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: \- Peptide YY (PYY) have an anorexigenic effect and are thought to contribute to impaired satiation and binge eating tendencies.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Leptin
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: * Leptin acts as a regulatory signal reflecting the adipose tissue stores. Both insufficiency and resistance to its actions promote hunger and increased food intake. Leptin can decrease food reward and act in the central nervous system as regulators of energy homeostasis.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Insulin
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: Insulin can decrease food reward and act in the central nervous system as regulators of energy homeostasis.
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Appetitive hormones outcomes - Cortisol
Assessment of appetitive hormones that modulate eating behavior: \- Cortisol is responsible for the stress response, acting on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, and it is associated with increased eating
Change measures: baseline and end of treatment at 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Eating Disorder Examination
baseline moment
Study Arms (2)
Psychobiotic group
EXPERIMENTALAn intervention group receiving a psychobiotic-a native inulin prebiotic. Native inulin extracted from chicory roots was selected as the psychobiotic since it is a mixture of short inulin molecules, which are metabolized primarily in the proximal colon and are more rapidly fermented, with longer chain ones, which are fermented later and slower in the distal colon. The psychobiotic nature of Inulin has been suggested in recent literature.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORA control group receiving a taste/appearance-matched placebo- the maltodextrin. Maltodextrin is a carbohydrate consisting of short chains of glucose molecules. It is commonly used as a placebo in clinical trials, providing no significant health benefits or harm when consumed with moderation.
Interventions
The dietary supplementation will follow established guidelines, recommending an intake of 16 g of prebiotic per day, distributed across three meals, for a duration of 12 weeks.
The control group will receive identical packaging that matches the experimental treatment in taste and appearance and will follow the same guidelines for consuming the placebo. For ethical reasons, after the end of the RCT, the control group will be given the option to receive the same prebiotic supplement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Portuguese adults (25 with normal weight; 25 with obesity only (30 ≤ BMI \< 40) and BED; 54 with BED)
- Residents in Portugal for the past 10 years
You may not qualify if:
- Significant weight loss (\>5% of body weight) in the past 2 years
- Antibiotic use in the past 6 months
- History of surgery or medical/psychiatric diseases
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- History of drug use or dependence
- Use of medications that impact weight
- Have metal implants or pacemakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidade do Portolead
- University of Minhocollaborator
- Braga Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Center for Psychology at University of Porto
Porto, Paranhos, 4200-135, Portugal
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eva M. Conceição
Center for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clarisse N. Salomé
Center for Engineering Biological (CEB) at University of Minho
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2025
First Posted
February 12, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2030
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- from jan 2030 to jan 2035
- Access Criteria
- Researcher with research track record in the filed by contacting the PI of the study.
All IPD collected throughout the trial.