Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes
Evaluation of Analytical Thinking Skills and Reaction Tests of Female Football Players on Performance: Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the effects of analytical thinking skills and reaction speed on performance in female football players.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2025
CompletedFebruary 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
Same day
December 21, 2024
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Accuracy
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Error Rates
Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).
day 1
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-Reaction Times
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item scale developed to assess fear of movement and reinjury. It includes parameters related to work activities, injury/reinjury, and fear-avoidance behaviors. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scoring system (1 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree). After reversing the scores of items 4, 8, 12, and 16, a total score is calculated, ranging from 17 to 68, where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.
day 1
Reaction Time Measurement (Using Blazepod)
Blazepod devices will be used to measure the reaction speed and agility of female football players. Pods will be randomly placed and programmed to flash at specific intervals. Participants will be required to respond quickly to the flashing pods, with their reaction times recorded in milliseconds. Statistical data such as correct and incorrect response rates will also be obtained.
day 1
Y-Balance Test
Evaluates balance by measuring reach distances in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.
day 1
Push-Up Test
Assesses upper body strength and endurance based on the number of push-ups performed.
day 1
Seated Ball Throw Test
Measures upper body power by recording the distance a seated participant can throw a ball.
day 1
Study Arms (1)
football player
football player
Eligibility Criteria
The footballers who will take part in the study will be selected from players between the ages of 18-30, who are actively playing in professional football teams and have at least two years of experience.
You may qualify if:
- Accepting the voluntary basis
- To be between the ages of 18-35
- To take part in professional football clubs
- Not having suffered any serious injury in the last 6 months
- To be able to participate in the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
- To be able to actively participate in technology-based tests such as decision-making simulations and Blazepod
You may not qualify if:
- Not accepting the voluntary basis
- Individuals who have had a surgical procedure in the last six months
- Use of NSAIDs and similar disease modifying drugs in the last month (Diaserein, Glucosamine etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bahçehir University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2024
First Posted
February 7, 2025
Study Start
January 6, 2025
Primary Completion
January 6, 2025
Study Completion
February 2, 2025
Last Updated
February 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share