"Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Venovenous extracorporeaL Membrane Oxygenation for Acute respIratory Distress syndrOme"
CALMDOWN
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
11
Brief Summary
The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation). The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO. Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_3
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 6, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 6, 2030
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 years
January 22, 2025
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of the application of early apneic ventilation on four components : mortality status at D60, need for lung transplantation at D60, persisting ECMO at D60, number of days alive between randomization and day 60 without ECMO
These components will be summarized in a composite, hierarchical outcome. Each patient will be compared with every other patient in the study and assigned a score (tie: 0, win: +1, loss: -1) for each pairwise comparison based on whom fared better. If one patient survived without lung transplantation or ECMO still ongoing at day 60 and the other did not, scores of +1 and -1 will be assigned, respectively. If both patients in the pairwise comparison survived without lung transplant or ECMO still ongoing at day 60, the assigned score will depend on which patient had more days free from ECMO: the patient with more days off ECMO will receive a score of +1, while the patient with fewer days will receive a score of -1. If both patients survived and had the same number of days off ECMO, or if both patients died or had a lung transplant, they will be both assigned a score of 0 for that pairwise comparison.
Day 0 to Day 60
Secondary Outcomes (39)
Mortality
From Day 1 to Day 60
Mortality
From Day 1 to Day 90
Need for lung transplant
From Day 1 to Day 60
Need for lung transplant
From Day 1 to Day 90
Duration of ECMO support
From Day 1 to Day 60
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group : near apneic ventilation
EXPERIMENTALPatients will received near apneic ventilation during the first 3 days of ECMO.
Standard of care : ultra-protective lung ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive ultra-protective lung ventilation as it uses on usual care on ECMO.
Interventions
Near apneic ventilation will be use during the first 3 days of ECMO. Patients will be ventilated in BIPAP/APRV or pressure-controlled ventilation. PEEP will be set to maintain the same mean airway pressure obtained during the standardized ventilation period pre-randomization to prevent lung derecruitment (PEEP ≥15cmH2O). If BIPAP/APRV is used, an RR of 2-4/min will be set with high pressure set at 30cmH20 for 3 sec. If pressure-controlled ventilation is selected, a respiratory rate of two sigh breaths/min with 30 cmH2O plateau pressure will be applied. Each sigh breath will be of three seconds duration. Neuromuscular blockade and sedation could be used at the discretion of the attending physician. After 3 days on ECMO, apneic ventilation could be pursued (at the physician's discretion). If not, ultra-protective lung ventilation will be applied (i.e standard of care). Prone positioning on ECMO will be left to the physicians' discretion.
Ultra-protective lung ventilation will be used up to the ECMO weaning. This group will receive ultra-protective lung ventilation with BIPAP/APRV or VCV mode setting a PEEP \>10 cmH2O, ΔP 14-15 cmH2O, RR 15-20/min, Vt 3-4ml/kg and lowest FiO2 to maintain SpO2\>92%. The use of prone positioning during ECMO will be left at the physician's discretion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- French Social security registration (except AME)
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Initiation of VV-ECMO \> 48 h (maximum tolerance : +2h)
- Irreversible neurological pathology
- End-stage chronic lung disease
- Contraindications for high PEEP level: untreated pneumothorax, barotrauma
- Irreversible ARDS with no hope for lung function recovery
- Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II \&gt;90
- Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C)
- Lung transplantation
- Burns on more than 20 % of the body surface
- Individuals under guardianship, or permanently legally incompetent adults
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Avicenne Hospital
Bobigny, France
Haut Levèque Hospital - CHU Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
Henri Mondor Hospital
Créteil, France
Croix-Rousse Hospital - HCL
Lyon, France
North Hospital - APHM
Marseille, France
Mercy Hospital - CHR Metz
Metz, France
Brabois Hospital - CHRU Nancy
Nancy, France
CHU Orléans
Orléans, France
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
Paris, France
Pontchaillou Hospital - CHU Rennes
Rennes, France
CHU Tours
Tours, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2025
First Posted
February 7, 2025
Study Start
May 6, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 6, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 6, 2030
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.