NCT06814340

Brief Summary

The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation). The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO. Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
280

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
49mo left

Started May 2025

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress20%
May 2025May 2030

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 7, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 6, 2025

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 6, 2029

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 6, 2030

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

January 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ECMOARDSCPAP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Efficacy of the application of early apneic ventilation on four components : mortality status at D60, need for lung transplantation at D60, persisting ECMO at D60, number of days alive between randomization and day 60 without ECMO

    These components will be summarized in a composite, hierarchical outcome. Each patient will be compared with every other patient in the study and assigned a score (tie: 0, win: +1, loss: -1) for each pairwise comparison based on whom fared better. If one patient survived without lung transplantation or ECMO still ongoing at day 60 and the other did not, scores of +1 and -1 will be assigned, respectively. If both patients in the pairwise comparison survived without lung transplant or ECMO still ongoing at day 60, the assigned score will depend on which patient had more days free from ECMO: the patient with more days off ECMO will receive a score of +1, while the patient with fewer days will receive a score of -1. If both patients survived and had the same number of days off ECMO, or if both patients died or had a lung transplant, they will be both assigned a score of 0 for that pairwise comparison.

    Day 0 to Day 60

Secondary Outcomes (39)

  • Mortality

    From Day 1 to Day 60

  • Mortality

    From Day 1 to Day 90

  • Need for lung transplant

    From Day 1 to Day 60

  • Need for lung transplant

    From Day 1 to Day 90

  • Duration of ECMO support

    From Day 1 to Day 60

  • +34 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group : near apneic ventilation

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will received near apneic ventilation during the first 3 days of ECMO.

Device: ECMO + near apneic ventilation

Standard of care : ultra-protective lung ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive ultra-protective lung ventilation as it uses on usual care on ECMO.

Device: ECMO + ultra-protective lung ventilation

Interventions

Near apneic ventilation will be use during the first 3 days of ECMO. Patients will be ventilated in BIPAP/APRV or pressure-controlled ventilation. PEEP will be set to maintain the same mean airway pressure obtained during the standardized ventilation period pre-randomization to prevent lung derecruitment (PEEP ≥15cmH2O). If BIPAP/APRV is used, an RR of 2-4/min will be set with high pressure set at 30cmH20 for 3 sec. If pressure-controlled ventilation is selected, a respiratory rate of two sigh breaths/min with 30 cmH2O plateau pressure will be applied. Each sigh breath will be of three seconds duration. Neuromuscular blockade and sedation could be used at the discretion of the attending physician. After 3 days on ECMO, apneic ventilation could be pursued (at the physician's discretion). If not, ultra-protective lung ventilation will be applied (i.e standard of care). Prone positioning on ECMO will be left to the physicians' discretion.

Intervention group : near apneic ventilation

Ultra-protective lung ventilation will be used up to the ECMO weaning. This group will receive ultra-protective lung ventilation with BIPAP/APRV or VCV mode setting a PEEP \>10 cmH2O, ΔP 14-15 cmH2O, RR 15-20/min, Vt 3-4ml/kg and lowest FiO2 to maintain SpO2\>92%. The use of prone positioning during ECMO will be left at the physician's discretion.

Standard of care : ultra-protective lung ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • French Social security registration (except AME)

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Initiation of VV-ECMO \> 48 h (maximum tolerance : +2h)
  • Irreversible neurological pathology
  • End-stage chronic lung disease
  • Contraindications for high PEEP level: untreated pneumothorax, barotrauma
  • Irreversible ARDS with no hope for lung function recovery
  • Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II \&amp;gt;90
  • Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C)
  • Lung transplantation
  • Burns on more than 20 % of the body surface
  • Individuals under guardianship, or permanently legally incompetent adults

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

Avicenne Hospital

Bobigny, France

RECRUITING

Haut Levèque Hospital - CHU Bordeaux

Bordeaux, France

RECRUITING

Henri Mondor Hospital

Créteil, France

RECRUITING

Croix-Rousse Hospital - HCL

Lyon, France

RECRUITING

North Hospital - APHM

Marseille, France

RECRUITING

Mercy Hospital - CHR Metz

Metz, France

RECRUITING

Brabois Hospital - CHRU Nancy

Nancy, France

RECRUITING

CHU Orléans

Orléans, France

RECRUITING

Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital

Paris, France

RECRUITING

Pontchaillou Hospital - CHU Rennes

Rennes, France

RECRUITING

CHU Tours

Tours, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory TherapyTherapeuticsExtracorporeal CirculationSurgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Matthieu SCHMIDT, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2025

First Posted

February 7, 2025

Study Start

May 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 6, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 6, 2030

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor.
Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Locations