Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Women With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the use of the progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) regarding the number of oocytes retrieved, percentage of MII oocytes, and the rate of good quality blastocysts available for cryopreservation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2025
CompletedFebruary 25, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.2 years
February 2, 2025
February 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of oocytes retrieved (ovarian response).
Total number of oocytes retrieved (in both groups)
Baseline
Percentage of MII oocytes.
Number of MII oocytes to the total number of oocytes retrieved (in both groups)
Baseline
Rate of good-quality blastocysts available for cryopreservation
percentage of the number of good-quality blastocysts to the number of 2PN fertilized oocytes cultured
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Fertilization rate
Baseline
Rate of blastocyst formation
Baseline
Clinical pregnancy rate after 1st FET
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation Group
• A daily dose of 20 mg dydrogesterone (2 Duphastone 10 mg tablets) will be added from day 1 or 2 of the menstrual cycle and will be continued till the day of the GnRH agonist trigger.
Antagonist protocol
• GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0.25 mg) subcutaneous injection will be added daily from the 6th day of ovarian stimulation and will be continued till the day of the GnRH agonist trigger.
Interventions
compare the use of the progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) regarding the number of oocytes retrieved, percentage of MII oocytes, and the rate of good quality blastocysts available for cryopreservation.
Subcutaneous injection
Eligibility Criteria
History taking and examination: * Basal ultrasound scanning includes 3D assessment of the uterine cavity and a basal hormonal profile. * Semen analysis. Ovarian stimulation: * Will be on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle * Using rFSH SC injections with a dose of 150 to 225 IU per day and highly purified hMG with a dose of 75 IU per day. These patients will be divided into two equal groups: Group 1 (Fixed GnRH antagonist protocol) (n= 50): • GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0.25 mg) SC injection will be added daily from the 6th day of COH and will be continued till the day of the GnRH agonist trigger. Group 2 (Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation) (n= 50): • A daily dose of 20 mg dydrogesterone (2 Duphastone 10 mg tablets) will be added from day 1 or 2 of the menstrual cycle till day of trigger
You may qualify if:
- Female age \<37 years.
- Body mass index (BMI) between (≥18 kg/m2 and ≤35 kg/m2).
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome patients (according to Rotterdam criteria).
- Patients suffering from primary or secondary infertility who are candidates for ICSI.
You may not qualify if:
- Uncorrected Uterine factor of infertility: intrauterine adhesions, submucosal fibroids, and septate uterus.
- Severe male factor infertility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ELShatby University Hospital
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21648, Egypt
Related Publications (14)
Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Alexopoulou E, Kolibianakis EM. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):683-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep436. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
PMID: 20008886BACKGROUNDGriesinger G, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM. GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Nov;13(5):628-38. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60652-9.
PMID: 17169171BACKGROUNDAl-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, Brown J, Lam WS, Broekmans FJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD001750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub4.
PMID: 27126581BACKGROUNDToftager M, Bogstad J, Lossl K, Praetorius L, Zedeler A, Bryndorf T, Nilas L, Pinborg A. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols. Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358.
PMID: 28130435BACKGROUNDDepalo R, Jayakrishan K, Garruti G, Totaro I, Panzarino M, Giorgino F, Selvaggi LE. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012 Apr 13;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-26.
PMID: 22500852BACKGROUNDMessinis IE. Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5):557-71. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml020. Epub 2006 May 3.
PMID: 16672246BACKGROUNDZhou R, Dong M, Huang L, Wang S, Fan L, Liang X, Zhang X, Liu F. Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1117513. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1117513. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37143731BACKGROUNDPirtea P, de Ziegler D, Poulain M, Ayoubi JM. New Twists in Ovarian Stimulation and Their Practical Implications. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Sep 4;6:197. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00197. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31555650BACKGROUNDZhu X, Ye H, Ye J, Fu Y. Progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):387. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1592.
PMID: 33842608BACKGROUNDChen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N, Tian L, Hao C, Yang D, Zhou F, Shi J, Xu Y, Li J, Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Zhang H, Legro RS. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):523-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873.
PMID: 27509101BACKGROUNDDelvigne A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):559-77. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.6.559.
PMID: 12498425BACKGROUNDSultan C, Paris F. Clinical expression of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescent girls. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86 Suppl 1:S6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.015.
PMID: 16798287BACKGROUNDThessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar;23(3):462-77. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem426.
PMID: 18308833BACKGROUNDZhu X, Ye H, Fu Y. The Utrogestan and hMG protocol in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF/ICSI treatments. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4193. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004193.
PMID: 27428219BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ismail E Khalifa, Ass.lecturer
Elshatby University hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sherif S Gafaar, Professor
Elshatby University hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2025
First Posted
February 6, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02