Impact of an Interactive Film on Resilience, Wellbeing, and Help-Seeking in School-Aged Youth
Impact of an Interactive Film-based Intervention on Resilience, Mental Wellbeing and Help-seeking Attitudes in Young People (14-18) At School Settings in North East of England: a Mixed-methods Cluster Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
175
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial of an interactive film intervention (commissioned through a North East and North Cumbria Child (NENC) Health \& Wellbeing Network partnership and produced by Trylife), on building resilience, enhancing mental wellbeing and help-seeking attitudes for young people (14-18 years) in schools located in deprived areas of the North East and North Cumbria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2025
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.8 years
January 17, 2025
January 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Willingness of schools to participate and be randomised
The qualitative assessment will be conducted through interviews with teachers and focus groups with students. They will be asked how they felt about randomisation and what, if any, challenges they encountered with this progression criterion.
Qualitative data collection phase, month 20-23
Participant recruitment and retention
Quantitative descriptive data, count number of participants at baseline, 3 and 6 month follow up
baseline, 3 and 6 month follow up
Suitability of data collection tools-Quantitative
Quantitative descriptive data, i.e. missing data
Quantitative missing data, after 6 months Follow up
Suitability of data collection tools-qualitative perspectives
qualitative interviews and perspectives of participants on questionnaires, i.e. what did they think of the measures, length etc
Qualitative data collection phase- month 20-23
Acceptability of the intervention
qualitative exploration through focus groupd and interveiws-Was the intervention and its implementation acceptable to participants and stakeholders, including intervention components and delivery mode?
Qualitative data collection phase, study month 20-23
Feasibility of recruiting schools
Project monitoring data (descriptive data on number of schools and time of recruitment)
Start intervention delivery - study month 6-
Feasibility of follow-up
Descriptive quantitaive data-What proportion of participants could be followed up at 3 and 6 months?
After 6 months Follow up
Feasibility consent procedures
Were consent procedures acceptable to participants? qualitative exploration through interviews and focus groups asking participants how they felt about consent procedures
Qualitative data collection phase month 20-23
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mental wellbeing scale
Baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Resilience scale
Baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Help-seeking attitudes scale
Baseline, 3-months, 6-months
Study Arms (3)
Control condition
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this condition received the standard Personal, Social, Health, and Economic (PSHE) Education curriculum provided by the school.
Interactive Film
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition engaged in three class sessions wherein they watched the interactive film. The film was delivered both individually and to the whole class and featured decision points, and the viewer's choices influenced the storyline's progression.
Interactive Film Plus Support
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition watched the interactive film as in the previous condition. Additionally, they participated in facilitated discussions led by trained youth workers, focusing on the decisions made in the film and their consequences.
Interventions
An interactive film, co-produced with young people, that aims to provide young people with a virtual experience of making choices and facing consequences in various life scenarios. At key moments the action is paused and the user decides the outcome. The particular film series that was commissioned and included in the trial was 'Jessica's story', which focused on perinatal mental health, as well as many other public health issues relevant to young people, including mental wellbeing, domestic violence, and help-seeking behaviour.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In selected Y10 or Y12 class (at start of study) at participating school
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of parental consent for Y10 students
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sunderlandlead
- University of Huddersfieldcollaborator
- University of Cumbriacollaborator
- Newcastle Universitycollaborator
- North East and North Cumbria Child Health and Wellbeing Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Sunderland
Sunderland, Sunderland, SR1 3SD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Christie-de Jong F, Walker E, Corlett H, Hardarce C, Soulsby E, Arnott B, Franks K, Ling J, Stephenson J, Azevedo LB. A cluster randomised feasibility trial assessing an interactive film intervention to improve wellbeing of young people in school settings in the North of England. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Sep 2;11(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01699-1.
PMID: 40898276DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Floor Christie-de Jong
University of Sunderland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor in Public Health for Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2025
First Posted
February 4, 2025
Study Start
June 14, 2021
Primary Completion
March 20, 2023
Study Completion
April 29, 2023
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Anonymised data can be shared upon reasonable request to the PI