NCT06806553

Brief Summary

Hemiparesis is a condition characterized by weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it difficult to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing (Iswatun et al., 2022). It is a common after-effect of stroke that causes weakness on one side of the body, limiting movement and affecting all basic activities such as dressing, eating, and walking. Hemiparesis can also be a sign of a stroke, and the side of the body weakened by hemiparesis could be ipsilateral (the same side as the brain injury) or contralateral (the opposite side of the brain injury) (Obman, 2020). The symptoms of hemiparesis include: Weakness, Difficulty walking, Loss of balance, Muscle fatigue, Difficulty with coordination, Inability to grasp objects. Additionally, a person with hemiparesis may experience trouble maintaining balance, standing, or walking, as well as a tingling or numbing sensation on the weak side (Brandstaedter \& Lindenbaum, 2023). Difficulty grabbing things, moving with precision, and lack of coordination can also be present. Hemiparesis is a one-sided muscle weakness that can affect all or most of the anatomical segments on one side of the body (Dantes et al., 2020). Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (MCIMT) with combination of Motor Relearning Program (MRP) has significant effects on stroke rehabilitation. CIMT is considered to achieve its beneficial effects through mechanisms such as overcoming learned nonuse and use-dependent neural plasticity. However, in case of Bobath there in no such evidence. Therefore more studies are needed to evaluate the effects of CIMT with MRP and Bobath only in both acute and chronic post-stroke populations. Therefore, the aim of this research is to focus on rehabilitation of hemiparetic arm. This present study compared the effects of CIMT with MRP versus Bobath to Augment Functional Motor Recovery of Chronic Hemiparetic Arm.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 26, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 11, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 21, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 4, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

January 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)Motor Relearning Program (MRP)Bobath TherapyStroke RehabilitationUpper Limb HemiparesisMotor Function Recovery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a widely used clinical tool designed to evaluate motor impairment, balance, sensation, and joint functioning in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia. It consists of various items that assess motor function in the upper and lower extremities, providing a comprehensive measure of motor recovery post-stroke.

    Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale used to assess spasticity in patients with lesions to the central nervous system. Scores on the MAS range from 0 to 4, where lower scores represent normal muscle tone and higher scores indicate increased spasticity. The MAS assigns a grade of spasticity based on resistance encountered during passive movement, with a grade of 0 indicating no increase in muscle tone and a grade of 4 representing limb rigidity in flexion or extension.

    Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain

    Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).

Study Arms (2)

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with the Motor Relearning Program (MRP)

EXPERIMENTAL

Intensive training sessions focusing on the paretic arm. The unaffected arm is constrained using a mitt or sling to encourage using the affected limb. Emphasis on repetitive practice of functional tasks to enhance motor learning and skill acquisition. MRP Components: Standard physiotherapy sessions emphasizing strength, range of motion, and coordination. Task-specific training and neuromuscular re-education to improve motor function. Therapy sessions are conducted five days a week for six weeks, with additional home exercise programs to reinforce skills.

Behavioral: Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) With Motor Relearning Program (MRP)

Bobath therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Bobath therapy is a task-oriented approach focusing on balance, postural control, and the facilitation of normal movement patterns to improve motor skills and independence. It aims to inhibit abnormal muscle tone and promote efficient motor strategies.

Behavioral: Bobath Therapy

Interventions

Intensive training sessions of 3 hours/day for 6 weeks, focusing on functional tasks with the paretic arm while constraining the unaffected arm using a mitt or sling. Implement a constraint on the non-paretic arm to encourage increased use of the affected arm in daily activities. Use shaping techniques to gradually increase the complexity and difficulty of tasks performed with the affected arm (Rahman, 2016). MRP: Standard physiotherapy sessions of 1 hour/day for 6 weeks, including exercises for both affected and unaffected arm. Focus on improving strength, range of motion, and coordination through repetitive task practice, neuromuscular re-education and compensatory strategies (Brkić, 2016; Ghrouz et al., 2023).

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with the Motor Relearning Program (MRP)
Bobath TherapyBEHAVIORAL

The first step in the Bobath approach is a thorough assessment of the individual's movement patterns, muscle tone, strength, coordination, and functional abilities. This assessment helps in identifying specific impairments and setting goals for treatment. Bobath therapists use specific handling techniques to facilitate normal movement patterns and inhibit abnormal muscle tone. These hands-on techniques aim to promote efficient movement and improve motor control. The Bobath approach emphasizes task-oriented training, where functional activities relevant to the individual's daily life are incorporated into therapy sessions. This helps in improving motor skills in a context that is meaningful to the individual (Grozdek Čovčić et al., 2022; Kuciel et al., 2021).

Bobath therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with chronic hemiparesis at least 6 months prior to study enrollment (Lang et al., 2016).
  • Chronic hemiparesis affecting one arm only (Lang et al., 2016).
  • Age between 50 and 65 years old (Lang et al., 2016).
  • Patients experiencing functional limitations in upper limb motor function (Gracies et al., 2019).
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24 (Page et al., 2007).
  • Patients with mild to moderate spasticity (Jan et al., 2019).
  • Able to tolerate and participate actively in the assigned intervention (Gracies et al., 2019)

You may not qualify if:

  • Recent acute medical/surgical condition unrelated to stroke (Lang et al., 2016).
  • Severe cognitive impairment or communication difficulties (Lang et al., 2016)
  • Uncontrolled pain or spasticity in the affected arm (Lang et al., 2016).
  • History of shoulder instability or major orthopedic surgery in the affected arm (Gracies et al., 2019).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54590, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

    PMID: 27447365BACKGROUND
  • Jan S, Arsh A, Darain H, Gul S. A randomized control trial comparing the effects of motor relearning programme and mirror therapy for improving upper limb motor functions in stroke patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;69(9):1242-1245.

    PMID: 31511706BACKGROUND
  • Grozdek Covcic G, Jurak I, Telebuh M, Macek Z, Bertic Z, Zura N, Grubisic M, Matic H, Tislar MH, Jakus L. Effects of Bobath treatment and specific mobilizations on gait in stroke patients: A randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(4):493-500. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210326.

    PMID: 35311720BACKGROUND
  • Gracies JM, Pradines M, Ghedira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, Gault-Colas C, Audureau E, Hutin E, Baude M, Bayle N; Neurorestore Study Group. Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y.

    PMID: 30871480BACKGROUND
  • Ghrouz A, Guillen-Sola A, Morgado-Perez A, Munoz-Redondo E, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Curbelo Pena Y, Duarte E. The effect of a motor relearning on balance and postural control in patients after stroke: An open-label randomized controlled trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):303-311. doi: 10.1177/23969873231220218. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

    PMID: 38158722BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeParesis

Interventions

Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Faiza Sharif, PhD.PT

    University of Lahore

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Arooj Fatima, Phd.PT

    University of Lahore

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Single-blinded assessor was considered to minimize bias in outcome measurements. The assessor was unaware of the intervention group assignment for each participant.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: For a study comparing the effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) combined with Motor Relearning Program (MRP) and Bobath therapy on functional motor recovery in patients with chronic hemiparesis.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Demonstrator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2025

First Posted

February 4, 2025

Study Start

January 26, 2024

Primary Completion

November 11, 2024

Study Completion

December 21, 2024

Last Updated

February 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Locations