Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with Motor Relearning Program (MRP) and Bobath Approach to Augment Functional Motor Recovery of Chronic Hemiparetic Arm
CIMT-MRP
Comparative Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with Motor Relearning Program (MRP) and Bobath Approach to Augment Functional Motor Recovery of Chronic Hemiparetic Arm
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemiparesis is a condition characterized by weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it difficult to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing (Iswatun et al., 2022). It is a common after-effect of stroke that causes weakness on one side of the body, limiting movement and affecting all basic activities such as dressing, eating, and walking. Hemiparesis can also be a sign of a stroke, and the side of the body weakened by hemiparesis could be ipsilateral (the same side as the brain injury) or contralateral (the opposite side of the brain injury) (Obman, 2020). The symptoms of hemiparesis include: Weakness, Difficulty walking, Loss of balance, Muscle fatigue, Difficulty with coordination, Inability to grasp objects. Additionally, a person with hemiparesis may experience trouble maintaining balance, standing, or walking, as well as a tingling or numbing sensation on the weak side (Brandstaedter \& Lindenbaum, 2023). Difficulty grabbing things, moving with precision, and lack of coordination can also be present. Hemiparesis is a one-sided muscle weakness that can affect all or most of the anatomical segments on one side of the body (Dantes et al., 2020). Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (MCIMT) with combination of Motor Relearning Program (MRP) has significant effects on stroke rehabilitation. CIMT is considered to achieve its beneficial effects through mechanisms such as overcoming learned nonuse and use-dependent neural plasticity. However, in case of Bobath there in no such evidence. Therefore more studies are needed to evaluate the effects of CIMT with MRP and Bobath only in both acute and chronic post-stroke populations. Therefore, the aim of this research is to focus on rehabilitation of hemiparetic arm. This present study compared the effects of CIMT with MRP versus Bobath to Augment Functional Motor Recovery of Chronic Hemiparetic Arm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2025
CompletedFebruary 4, 2025
January 1, 2025
10 months
January 28, 2025
January 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA)
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a widely used clinical tool designed to evaluate motor impairment, balance, sensation, and joint functioning in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia. It consists of various items that assess motor function in the upper and lower extremities, providing a comprehensive measure of motor recovery post-stroke.
Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point scale used to assess spasticity in patients with lesions to the central nervous system. Scores on the MAS range from 0 to 4, where lower scores represent normal muscle tone and higher scores indicate increased spasticity. The MAS assigns a grade of spasticity based on resistance encountered during passive movement, with a grade of 0 indicating no increase in muscle tone and a grade of 4 representing limb rigidity in flexion or extension.
Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain
Baseline, mid-intervention (3 weeks), and post-intervention (6 weeks).
Study Arms (2)
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) with the Motor Relearning Program (MRP)
EXPERIMENTALIntensive training sessions focusing on the paretic arm. The unaffected arm is constrained using a mitt or sling to encourage using the affected limb. Emphasis on repetitive practice of functional tasks to enhance motor learning and skill acquisition. MRP Components: Standard physiotherapy sessions emphasizing strength, range of motion, and coordination. Task-specific training and neuromuscular re-education to improve motor function. Therapy sessions are conducted five days a week for six weeks, with additional home exercise programs to reinforce skills.
Bobath therapy
EXPERIMENTALBobath therapy is a task-oriented approach focusing on balance, postural control, and the facilitation of normal movement patterns to improve motor skills and independence. It aims to inhibit abnormal muscle tone and promote efficient motor strategies.
Interventions
Intensive training sessions of 3 hours/day for 6 weeks, focusing on functional tasks with the paretic arm while constraining the unaffected arm using a mitt or sling. Implement a constraint on the non-paretic arm to encourage increased use of the affected arm in daily activities. Use shaping techniques to gradually increase the complexity and difficulty of tasks performed with the affected arm (Rahman, 2016). MRP: Standard physiotherapy sessions of 1 hour/day for 6 weeks, including exercises for both affected and unaffected arm. Focus on improving strength, range of motion, and coordination through repetitive task practice, neuromuscular re-education and compensatory strategies (Brkić, 2016; Ghrouz et al., 2023).
The first step in the Bobath approach is a thorough assessment of the individual's movement patterns, muscle tone, strength, coordination, and functional abilities. This assessment helps in identifying specific impairments and setting goals for treatment. Bobath therapists use specific handling techniques to facilitate normal movement patterns and inhibit abnormal muscle tone. These hands-on techniques aim to promote efficient movement and improve motor control. The Bobath approach emphasizes task-oriented training, where functional activities relevant to the individual's daily life are incorporated into therapy sessions. This helps in improving motor skills in a context that is meaningful to the individual (Grozdek Čovčić et al., 2022; Kuciel et al., 2021).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with chronic hemiparesis at least 6 months prior to study enrollment (Lang et al., 2016).
- Chronic hemiparesis affecting one arm only (Lang et al., 2016).
- Age between 50 and 65 years old (Lang et al., 2016).
- Patients experiencing functional limitations in upper limb motor function (Gracies et al., 2019).
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24 (Page et al., 2007).
- Patients with mild to moderate spasticity (Jan et al., 2019).
- Able to tolerate and participate actively in the assigned intervention (Gracies et al., 2019)
You may not qualify if:
- Recent acute medical/surgical condition unrelated to stroke (Lang et al., 2016).
- Severe cognitive impairment or communication difficulties (Lang et al., 2016)
- Uncontrolled pain or spasticity in the affected arm (Lang et al., 2016).
- History of shoulder instability or major orthopedic surgery in the affected arm (Gracies et al., 2019).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54590, Pakistan
Related Publications (5)
Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
PMID: 27447365BACKGROUNDJan S, Arsh A, Darain H, Gul S. A randomized control trial comparing the effects of motor relearning programme and mirror therapy for improving upper limb motor functions in stroke patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;69(9):1242-1245.
PMID: 31511706BACKGROUNDGrozdek Covcic G, Jurak I, Telebuh M, Macek Z, Bertic Z, Zura N, Grubisic M, Matic H, Tislar MH, Jakus L. Effects of Bobath treatment and specific mobilizations on gait in stroke patients: A randomized clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;50(4):493-500. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210326.
PMID: 35311720BACKGROUNDGracies JM, Pradines M, Ghedira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, Gault-Colas C, Audureau E, Hutin E, Baude M, Bayle N; Neurorestore Study Group. Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y.
PMID: 30871480BACKGROUNDGhrouz A, Guillen-Sola A, Morgado-Perez A, Munoz-Redondo E, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Curbelo Pena Y, Duarte E. The effect of a motor relearning on balance and postural control in patients after stroke: An open-label randomized controlled trial. Eur Stroke J. 2024 Jun;9(2):303-311. doi: 10.1177/23969873231220218. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
PMID: 38158722BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Faiza Sharif, PhD.PT
University of Lahore
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arooj Fatima, Phd.PT
University of Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blinded assessor was considered to minimize bias in outcome measurements. The assessor was unaware of the intervention group assignment for each participant.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Demonstrator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2025
First Posted
February 4, 2025
Study Start
January 26, 2024
Primary Completion
November 11, 2024
Study Completion
December 21, 2024
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01