Resistance Training and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patients
Comparative Effects of Resistance Training and Constrained Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery and Quality of Life in Sub-acute Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study explored two common rehabilitation strategies-Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Resistance Training (RT)-to help stroke survivors improve movement and function in their weaker arm. Stroke can often lead to reduced mobility in one arm, which affects a person's independence and quality of life. This randomized clinical trial involved 64 patients between the ages of 40 to 60 who had experienced a stroke and were in the sub-acute phase of recovery. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received CIMT and the other received RT. The CIMT group had their unaffected arm restrained for 6 hours per day and completed 3 hours of supervised exercises using the affected arm. The RT group participated in structured strength training using weights to target shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles. Both groups were treated five days a week for 12 weeks. Throughout the study, researchers assessed participants using three tools: the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for arm function, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor recovery, and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) for overall well-being. These assessments were conducted at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2025
CompletedApril 18, 2025
April 1, 2025
5 months
April 3, 2025
April 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The ARAT is a standardized test used to assess upper extremity motor function. It evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement using 19 items scored on a 4-point scale. Scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better function.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) - Upper Extremity Section
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) for 12 weeks. The unaffected upper limb was constrained for 6 hours per day using a mitt, and patients completed 3-hour daily sessions of task-specific functional training with the affected limb, 5 days per week. Exercises included grasping, stretching, pushing, button pressing, and fine motor tasks designed to improve upper limb function and daily activity performance. A home exercise plan was also provided.
Resistance Training (RT) Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group underwent Resistance Training (RT) focused on the affected upper extremity for 12 weeks. Exercises targeted shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles using weight cuffs (½-1 kg) based on 1RM assessment. Each session included 3 sets of 8 reps for 4 different exercises, 5 days a week. The training started with 50% 1RM intensity for 4 weeks and progressed to 70% over the next 8 weeks. Sessions lasted 60 minutes and included rest intervals. A structured home exercise program was also provided.
Interventions
This intervention involved constraining the unaffected upper limb for 6 hours per day and performing 3-hour intermittent daily sessions of functional task practice with the affected limb for 12 weeks, 5 days per week. Exercises included stretching, grasping, dexterity tasks, and functional activities like self-feeding and button pressing. The program used shaping techniques to increase task difficulty and improve motor recovery. A home exercise program was also prescribed for daily practice.
This intervention consisted of structured progressive resistance exercises targeting the affected upper limb muscles (shoulder, elbow, wrist) using weight cuffs (½-1 kg). Sessions were 60 minutes/day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks. Intensity progressed from 50% to 70% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) based on individual capacity. Exercises were performed in 3 sets of 8 repetitions for each muscle group, with 2-minute rest intervals. A home program included additional wrist and hand strengthening tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient having age between 40-60 years
- Both gender were included
- Patient diagnosed with hemiparesis having grade 1 or 2 using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
- Participant able to sit independently for 60 min
- Patients experiencing functional limitations in upper limb motor function
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with severe aphasia, severe shoulder pain affecting therapy or any comorbid condition that could limit UE function, visual or hearing impairment
- Uncontrolled pain or spasticity in the affected arm
- History of shoulder instability or major orthopedic surgery in the affected arm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Lahore Teaching Hospital
Lahore, 54590, Pakistan
Related Publications (2)
Gracies JM, Pradines M, Ghedira M, Loche CM, Mardale V, Hennegrave C, Gault-Colas C, Audureau E, Hutin E, Baude M, Bayle N; Neurorestore Study Group. Guided Self-rehabilitation Contract vs conventional therapy in chronic stroke-induced hemiparesis: NEURORESTORE, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1257-y.
PMID: 30871480BACKGROUNDLang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ, Dromerick AW, Birkenmeier RL. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. doi: 10.1002/ana.24734. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
PMID: 27447365BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2025
First Posted
April 18, 2025
Study Start
October 15, 2024
Primary Completion
March 19, 2025
Study Completion
April 2, 2025
Last Updated
April 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share