NCT06805123

Brief Summary

Currently, there are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal timing for dietary restart after gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). While several studies have addressed upper gastrointestinal ESD, a meta-analysis reported that early feeding, initiated within one day after the procedure, showed no statistically significant difference in complication rates compared to delayed feeding initiated after two or more days. Moreover, early feeding was associated with shorter hospital stays and higher patient satisfaction. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated early feeding in colorectal ESD. On the other hand, in the context of surgical procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract, several studies suggest that early feeding may offer clinical advantages over delayed feeding. The aim of this study is to explore the optimal timing for dietary restart following colorectal ESD. In the early feeding group (\<24 hours), patients begin water intake if no abnormalities are observed during a follow-up examination conducted two hours post-procedure. If no further issues arise after an additional two hours, a liquid diet is initiated. In contrast, the delayed feeding group (\>24 hours) maintains fasting on the day of the procedure and begins a liquid diet the following day. The study will compare the early and delayed feeding groups in terms of post-ESD early complications (e.g., bleeding, perforation, post-coagulation syndrome), length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and delayed complications.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
204

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
0mo left

Started Feb 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress97%
Feb 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

colorectumendoscopic submucosal dissectionfeeding

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complication

    Bleeding, perforation, Post procedural coagulation syndrome

    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Length of hospital stay

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • patient satisfaction

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Early feeding group

EXPERIMENTAL

The group implementing early feeding (\< 24hr).

Other: Early feeding

Late feeding group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group implementing late feeding (\> 24hr).

Other: Late feeding

Interventions

Begin drinking water 2 hours after the procedure. If no complications occur 2 hours after starting water intake, progress to a liquid diet. If no abnormalities are observed after the liquid diet, transition to a soft diet for the next meal.

Early feeding group

Maintain fasting on the day of the procedure. Begin a liquid diet 24 hours after the procedure. If no complications occur after starting the liquid diet, transition to a soft diet at the next meal.

Late feeding group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Differentiated early colorectal cancer confined to the mucosa, without ulcers, and measuring ≤5 cm
  • Laterally spreading tumors measuring ≥2 cm
  • Sessile polyps measuring ≥2 cm
  • Adenomas accompanied by fibrosis
  • Differentiated early cancer of the colon or rectum without lymph node metastasis, aside from those covered by partial self-payment insurance (Korean National Health insurance)
  • Submucosal tumors of the colon or rectum
  • Patients who have signed the consent form to participate in this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Patients with unresolved colorectal cancer
  • Patients with non-remissive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Patients with blood coagulation disorders
  • Patients with a prothrombin time (PT) INR ≥ 1.5 despite medical correction
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who refuse to participate in this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Inje university busan paik hospital

Busan, 47392, South Korea

RECRUITING

Pusan National University Hospital

Busan, 49241, South Korea

RECRUITING

Kosin university gospel hospital

Busan, 49267, South Korea

RECRUITING

Ulsan university hospital

Ulsan, 44033, South Korea

RECRUITING

Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital

Yangsan, 50612, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Sang Un Park, Dong Kyung Chang. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2010;40.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102569. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

    PMID: 28212588BACKGROUND
  • Hirao M, Masuda K, Asanuma T, Naka H, Noda K, Matsuura K, Yamaguchi O, Ueda N. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and other tumors with local injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 May-Jun;34(3):264-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71327-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3391382BACKGROUND
  • Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H, Saito Y, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Yokota T. A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Oct;50(4):560-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70084-2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10502182BACKGROUND
  • Hosokawa K, Yoshida S. [Recent advances in endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Mar;25(4):476-83. Japanese.

    PMID: 9530352BACKGROUND
  • Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):225-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.2.225.

    PMID: 11156645BACKGROUND
  • Masakatsu Fukuzawa, Takuji Gotoda. History of endoscopic submucosal dissection and role for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A Japanese perspective. Gastrointestinal Intervention 2012;1:30-35.

    BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H, Oka S, Chayama K. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01252.x.

    PMID: 22533757BACKGROUND
  • Kim ER, Chang DK. Management of Complications of Colorectal Submucosal Dissection. Clin Endosc. 2019 Mar;52(2):114-119. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.063. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

    PMID: 30959586BACKGROUND
  • Watanabe J, Watanabe J, Kotani K. Early vs. Delayed Feeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 27;56(12):653. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120653.

    PMID: 33261059BACKGROUND
  • Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hubner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale RG, Waitzberg D, Bischoff SC, Singer P. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;40(7):4745-4761. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

    PMID: 34242915BACKGROUND
  • Canzan F, Longhini J, Caliaro A, Cavada ML, Mezzalira E, Paiella S, Ambrosi E. The effect of early oral postoperative feeding on the recovery of intestinal motility after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Front Nutr. 2024 May 16;11:1369141. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1369141. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 38818132BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Dong Hoon Baek, MD, PhD

    Pusan National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Seung Min Hong, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: One group undergoes early feeding (\< 24 hours), while the other group undergoes late feeding (\> 24 hours).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2025

First Posted

February 3, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations