NCT06803147

Brief Summary

Rationale: Until recently, the conventional strategy outlined by both national and international guidelines for managing non-dysplastic (ND) Barrett esophagus (BE), involved endoscopic surveillance at 3 to 5 year intervals, aiming to reduce mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) through early detection and treatment. However, scientific evidence that supports the benefits in EAC-specific and/or overall survival, or that shows cost-effectiveness, is lacking. This has led to a re-evaluation of surveillance practices, particularly for NDBE patients at low risk of progression to EAC. For this reason, and in light of the 'NVMDL knowledge agenda,' a recent adjustment has been made to the Dutch guideline, recommending discontinuation of endoscopic surveillance for low-risk NDBE patients, hypothesizing that discontinuing endoscopic surveillance in low-risk NDBE patients will not lead to a relevant increase in the incidence of clinically significant EAC. This study aims to evaluate long-term outcomes of this guideline change. Objective: The primary objective is to evaluate the incidence of clinically apparent EAC after discontinuation of endoscopic surveillance in low-risk NDBE patients. Study design: This is a nationwide, prospective, single-arm observational study with a minimum duration of 10 years. All patients in the Netherlands, eligible for study participation, will be approached and, upon signing informed consent, included in this care evaluation project. Baseline information will be collected from endoscopy and pathology reports and the electronic patient files. During follow-up, data will be collected from existing registries, including the national pathology database named Pathologisch-Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomatiseerd Archief (PALGA), the national statistics database named: Central Bureau van Statistiek (CBS), Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL), and if necessary, additional information will be collected from electronic patient files in patient's hospital or the general practitioner. On an annual basis, study outcomes will be evaluated and reviewed by a DSMB according to pre-defined stopping rules. Study population: All low-risk NDBE patients in the Netherlands in whom endoscopic surveillance will no longer be indicated based on the new Dutch guideline recommendations will be included. This includes patients with (1) BE with a maximum extent \<5cm in length; (2) without (a history of) dysplasia; and (3) without a family history for EAC. A family history of EAC is defined as at least one first-degree relative with esophageal cancer. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary study endpoint: the annual incidence of patients with clinically apparent EAC during a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinically apparent EAC is defined as one of the following:

  • EAC related death, and/or
  • EAC that exceeds boundaries for curative endoscopic treatment, defined as any symptomatic EAC that undergoes (1) palliative treatment; (2) esophagectomy; (3) chemotherapy; (4) radiotherapy; (5) immunotherapy; and/or (6) non-endoscopic therapy otherwise. Two separate cohorts will be identified; (1) patients with an endoscopic surveillance history at the moment of study inclusion; and (2) patients with newly diagnosed NDBE at the moment of study inclusion. The primary endpoint will be evaluated separately in both cohorts. The power calculation will be based on the primary endpoint evaluation only in cohort 2, since cohort 1 is prone to selection bias. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This registry that evaluates outcomes of regular clinical care, imposes minimal burden on participants. Subjects are not exposed to procedures or interventions. Data collection is based on existing national databases and medical records. Participants will provide informed consent for inclusion in the database, to ensure that patients understand the study's scope and their rights, with no further obligations for active involvement. Of note, discontinuation of endoscopic surveillance is standard practice according to the guideline. The current studies passively evaluates the outcomes, and patients only provide informed consent for inclusion in the registry. If a patient does not sign the informed consent form, the patient is not included in the registry, still, endoscopic surveillance for this patient will be discontinued. Also robust measures will be implemented to ensure strict adherence to data protection regulations and safeguard participants' privacy and confidentiality. The primary focus remains on upholding ethical standards and minimizing any potential risks to participants while still be able to monitor relevant outcomes

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,156

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
142mo left

Started Mar 2025

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress10%
Mar 2025Feb 2038

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 31, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2025

Completed
12.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 7, 2038

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 7, 2038

Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12.9 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Barrett EsophagusEsophageal cancerAppropriate careEndoscopic surveillance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical esophageal adenocarcinoma

    Number of patietns with EAC related death, and/or EAC exceeding boundaries for endoscopic treatment EAC that exceeds boundaries for curative endoscopic treatment, defined as any symptomatic EAC that undergoes (1) palliative treatment; (2) esophagectomy; (3) chemotherapy; (4) radiotherapy; (5) immunotherapy; and/or (6) non-endoscopic therapy otherwise.

    10 years

Interventions

Endoscopic surveillance is discontinued for eligible patients in line with the new guideline revision, and patients are then followed in this prospective cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with low-risk Barrett esophagus

You may qualify if:

  • In order to be eligible to be included in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Histological diagnosis of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE).
  • Barrett's esophagus segment with a maximum length of less than 5 cm (Prague classification M\<5).
  • At least one adequate, high-quality upper endoscopy with assessment of the Barrett segment performed according to existing guidelines, as evaluated by the referring endoscopist. A high-quality endoscopy is defined as: adequate imaging with high-resolutoin endoscope with sampling performed according to the Seattle protocol, and in absence of LA grade C or D reflux esophagitis. The endoscopist determines whether the last endoscopy was of high-quality. If this was not the case, the endoscopist may decide to schedule a new encoscopy.
  • No recent history of confirmed indefinite for dysplasia (IND) or confirmed LGD, defined as no LGD and/or IND in the last 2 years and not in the last endoscopy.No history of HGD or cancer in BE
  • Informed consent provided by the patient or legal guardian.

You may not qualify if:

  • A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • BE with (history of) dysplasia, either:
  • Prior cancer
  • Prior HGD
  • Confirmed LGD or IND in the last 2 years or during the last endoscopy
  • Patients with an endoscopically visible lesion
  • Patients with active reflux esophagitis LA grade C or D
  • Patients with Barrett's esophagus with a maximum extent \<1cm in length with currently already no surveillance indication.
  • Patients with a family history of esophageal adenocarcinoma, defined as at least one first-degree relative with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Centrum voor Vroegdiagnostiek (Barrett Coordination Centre)

Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Barrett EsophagusEsophageal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteHead and Neck Neoplasms

Central Study Contacts

Sanne SN van Munster, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
10 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2025

First Posted

January 31, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 7, 2038

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 7, 2038

Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations