NCT06788860

Brief Summary

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided tri-directional needle knife release in treating patients with trigger finger. The study evaluates safety, effectiveness, and recovery outcomes of a minimally invasive procedure compared to conventional approaches.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 20, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 29, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Trigger FingerA1 Pulley ReleaseUltrasound-Guided Technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Improvement in hand and finger function

    Functional improvement evaluation using the QuickDASH score (0-100 scale)

    6 months

  • Reduction in Pain scores post-procedure

    Evaluating of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided tri-directional needle knife release in reducing pain scores among patients with trigger finger using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (scale 0-10)

    6 months

  • Improvement of finger mobility

    Measurment of joint mobility in degrees at MCP and PIP joints using goniometer.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient Satisfaction with the procedure

    6 months

  • Rate of procedure-related complications

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Ultrasound-Guided Tri-directional Needle Knife Release Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will undergo ultrasound- guided tri-directional needle knife release for treatment of trigger finger. Local anesthesia using 3-5 ml of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for patient comfort. This procedure involves precise ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate and safe dissection of the thickened A1-Pulley.

Procedure: Tri-directional Ultrasound-guided Needle Knife Release

Interventions

This procedure involves ultrasound-guided tri-directional needle knife release for the treatment of trigger finger. Local anesthesia using 3-5 ml of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for patient comfort. It aims to ensure precise tissue dissection while minimizing risks and improving outcomes. Device: Sonosite M-Turbo Ultrasound Machine with Linear Probe HFL38x (6-13 MHz) is used for real-time imaging during the procedure.

Ultrasound-Guided Tri-directional Needle Knife Release Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Idiopathic TF at the level of A1 pulley
  • Trigger finger of Green's grades II or III or IV (moderate to severe)
  • Symptoms persist for at least three months despite conservative treatments.
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up requirements.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with secondary causes of TF like diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, hypothyroidism, amyloidosis, and sarcoidosis.
  • Patients with TF of Green's grade I.
  • Previous surgical intervention on the affected digit.
  • Allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Inability to comply with follow-up assessments.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura University Hospital

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • 1. Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Coert JH, Fridén J, Group EH. Multidisciplinary consensus guideline for managing trigger finger: results from the European HANDGUIDE Study. Physical therapy. 2014;94(10):1421-33. 2. Ferrara PE, Codazza S, Maccauro G, Zirio G, Ferriero G, Ronconi G. Physical therapies for the conservative treatment of the trigger finger: a narrative review. Orthopedic Reviews. 2020;12(Suppl 1). 3. Lee SH, Choi YC, Kang HJ. Comparative study of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release versus blinded percutaneous A1 pulley release. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2018;26(2):2309499018772368. 4. Sutter D, Treier A, Vögelin E. Sonographically controlled minimally-invasive A1 pulley release using a new guide instrument-a case series of 106 procedures in 64 patients. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2023;24(1):875. 5. Caballero EQ, Horcajadas ÁLB, Chaparro EC, Gana MDI, Franco IL-V, Villagrán JM. Ultrasound (US) of the fingers: anatomy and pathology. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2024;14(11):8012. 6. Pan M, Sheng S, Fan Z, Lu H, Yang H, Yan F, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of A1 pulley by using a needle knife: a prospective study of 41 cases. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2019;10:267. 7. Nikolaou VS, Malahias M-A, Kaseta M-K, Sourlas I, Babis GC. Comparative clinical study of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release vs open surgical intervention in the treatment of trigger finger. World journal of orthopedics. 2017;8(2):163. 8. Langley G, Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatology international. 1985;5(4):145-8. 9. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Smith P, Van Eerd D, Tang K, Inrig T, et al. Measurement properties of the Quick DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the Quick DASH: A systematic review. Quality of life research. 2013;22:2509-47. 10. Wolfe SW. Tendinopathy. Green's operative hand surgery. 2011:2067-88.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Trigger Finger Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tendon EntrapmentTendinopathyMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All participants will undergo ultrasound-guided tri-directional needle knife release for trigger finger treatment
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of Rheumatology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Posted

January 23, 2025

Study Start

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion

April 20, 2025

Study Completion

October 29, 2025

Last Updated

January 27, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share individual participant date (IPD) with other researchers.

Locations