Cognitive Augmentation Via Multimodal Sensing and Auricular Neurostimulation
CAMSAN
CAMSAN: Cognitive Augmentation Via Multimodal Sensing and Auricular Neurostimulation
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to extend this period of optimal cognitive performance by applying neurostimulation to buffer health volunteers against the effects of increased levels of stress, distraction, and cybersickness. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can we use OpenBCI's head-mounted Galea biosensor + eXtended Reality (XR) platform to measure participants' cognitive state in relation to stress, attention and cybersickness?
- How does applying external neurostimulation via Spark Biomedical's Sparrow Link transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) system enhance cognitive performance with a closed-loop interface that automatically applies neurostimulation as a function of physiologically determined stress, attention, and cybersickness metrics? Researchers will compare the active neurostimulation group to the sham neurostimulation group to see if cognitive performance is improved with stimulation. Participants will complete 4 virtual reality tasks in the lab:
- 2 tasks related to attention - Flanker and Gradual-onset Continual Performance Task (GradCPT)
- The Multi-Attribute Task Battery (MATB)
- A cybersickness task
- And a baseline session before each task
- Neurostimulation intervention will occur in response to cognitive states
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJune 12, 2025
June 1, 2025
3 months
January 13, 2025
June 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Flanker Task Performance
Performance will be measured by number of correct responses and reaction time. Specially we will look at mean change in score (percentage of correct responses) and reduction in reaction time.
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
GradCPT Task Performance
Performance will be measured by number of correct responses and reaction time. Specially we will look at mean change in score (percentage of correct responses) and reduction in reaction time.
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
MATB Task Performance
Performance will be measured by number of correct responses and performance in the resource management task. Specially we will look at mean task completion percentage and root mean squared error in resource management task.
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
Cybersickness Task Performance
Performance will be measured by time in experiment. Specifically we will look at mean time before cybersickness symptoms present and mean time before participants voluntarily discontinue the experiment.
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Bedford Work Scale Responses
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) Responses
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) Responses
Baseline, pre-intervention, and during the intervention phases
Study Arms (2)
Sham Stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham group will receive a device but no stimulation will be delivered.
Active tAN
EXPERIMENTALThis group receives active neurostimulation at different intervals, amplitudes, and frequencies via the Sparrow Link device.
Interventions
The stimulation frequency, pulse width, and amplitude will be varied in order to determine the optimal stimulation conditions for elongating the period of peak subject performance during the experimental tasks. Amplitude, pulse width, and frequency meet or exceed International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-2-10:2016 requirements. The amplitude range specified is selectable for either channel with any frequency and pulse width combination. We will test an amplitude range of 0 mA - 5.0 mA. We will test a frequency range of 1 Hz - 150 Hz. We will test a pulse width range of 50 μs - 750 μs. The study coordinator should apply neurostimulation when the reported cognitive state metric corresponding to the performance task reaches different thresholds. These thresholds will be determined before execution of the study and will be chosen to maximize the likelihood of discovering an optimal trigger for neurostimulation based on reported cognitive state.
Modulation of stimulation frequency and amplitudes outside of the known physiological effective ranges during intervention periods.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy human subjects between the ages of 18 and 55
- Normal color vision and near visual acuity of 20/30 without correction.
- Participant is right-hand dominant
- Proficient in the English language
- Ability to understand the explanations and instructions given by the study personnel
You may not qualify if:
- Participant presents current evidence of an uncontrolled and/or clinically significant medical condition or psychiatric condition
- Participant is participating in another interventional trial within 90 days prior to or throughout duration of trial
- Participant has a prior diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder, acute stress disorder, or generalized anxiety disorder
- Participant has a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or is currently taking medications for the treatment of ADHD.
- Current or recent history of substance abuse or drug dependence including nicotine and alcohol, or use of mind-altering drugs in the past 30 days.
- Participant has abnormal ear anatomy, ear infection present, or ear piercing that could interfere with stimulation
- Participant has a recent history of epileptic seizures; including photosensitive epilepsy
- Participant has a recent history of neurologic diseases or traumatic brain injury
- Participant has presence of implanted medical devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear prostheses, neurostimulators)
- Females who are pregnant or lactating
- Participant has any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants are risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial
- Sensitivity to bright screens or virtual reality displays
- Recent history of neurological and psychiatric disease/disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- OpenBCIlead
- Spark Biomedical, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
OpenBCI
Brooklyn, New York, 11222, United States
Related Publications (34)
Kiryu T, So RH. Sensation of presence and cybersickness in applications of virtual reality for advanced rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007 Sep 25;4:34. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-34.
PMID: 17894857BACKGROUNDYlikoski J, Markkanen M, Pirvola U, Lehtimaki JA, Ylikoski M, Jing Z, Sinkkonen ST, Makitie A. Stress and Tinnitus; Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Attenuates Tinnitus-Triggered Stress Reaction. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:570196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570196. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33041937BACKGROUNDYasemin M, Sarikaya MA, Ince G. Emotional State Estimation using Sensor Fusion of EEG and EDA. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:5609-5612. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856895.
PMID: 31947127BACKGROUNDWierda SM, van Rijn H, Taatgen NA, Martens S. Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8456-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201858109. Epub 2012 May 14.
PMID: 22586101BACKGROUNDVescio B, Salsone M, Gambardella A, Quattrone A. Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 13;18(3):844. doi: 10.3390/s18030844.
PMID: 29533990BACKGROUNDTrevino M, Zhu X, Lu YY, Scheuer LS, Passell E, Huang GC, Germine LT, Horowitz TS. How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jul 22;6(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00313-1.
PMID: 34292418BACKGROUNDSolhjoo S, Haigney MC, McBee E, van Merrienboer JJG, Schuwirth L, Artino AR Jr, Battista A, Ratcliffe TA, Lee HD, Durning SJ. Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Correlate with Clinical Reasoning Performance and Self-Reported Measures of Cognitive Load. Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 11;9(1):14668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50280-3.
PMID: 31604964BACKGROUNDSharon O, Fahoum F, Nir Y. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Humans Induces Pupil Dilation and Attenuates Alpha Oscillations. J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 13;41(2):320-330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1361-20.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
PMID: 33214317BACKGROUNDRuhnau P, Zaehle T. Transcranial Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) and Ear-EEG: Potential for Closed-Loop Portable Non-invasive Brain Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 14;15:699473. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.699473. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34194308BACKGROUNDRobertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J. 'Oops!': performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00015-8.
PMID: 9204482BACKGROUNDMorton J, Zheleva A, Van Acker BB, Durnez W, Vanneste P, Larmuseau C, De Bruyne J, Raes A, Cornillie F, Saldien J, De Marez L, Bombeke K. Danger, high voltage! Using EEG and EOG measurements for cognitive overload detection in a simulated industrial context. Appl Ergon. 2022 Jul;102:103763. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103763. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
PMID: 35405457BACKGROUNDMolefi E, McLoughlin I, Palaniappan R. On the potential of transauricular electrical stimulation to reduce visually induced motion sickness. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29765-9.
PMID: 36841838BACKGROUNDMiller AL, Unsworth N. Variation in attention at encoding: Insights from pupillometry and eye gaze fixations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Dec;46(12):2277-2294. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000797. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
PMID: 31750720BACKGROUNDMercante B, Deriu F, Rangon CM. Auricular Neuromodulation: The Emerging Concept beyond the Stimulation of Vagus and Trigeminal Nerves. Medicines (Basel). 2018 Jan 21;5(1):10. doi: 10.3390/medicines5010010.
PMID: 29361732BACKGROUNDMcDuff D, Gontarek S, Picard R. Remote measurement of cognitive stress via heart rate variability. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2957-60. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944243.
PMID: 25570611BACKGROUNDLindsay GW. Attention in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Machine Learning. Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Apr 16;14:29. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2020.00029. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32372937BACKGROUNDLandolt K, Maruff P, Horan B, Kingsley M, Kinsella G, O'Halloran PD, Hale MW, Wright BJ. Chronic work stress and decreased vagal tone impairs decision making and reaction time in jockeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Oct;84:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.07.238. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28732265BACKGROUNDKaniusas E, Kampusch S, Tittgemeyer M, Panetsos F, Gines RF, Papa M, Kiss A, Podesser B, Cassara AM, Tanghe E, Samoudi AM, Tarnaud T, Joseph W, Marozas V, Lukosevicius A, Istuk N, Sarolic A, Lechner S, Klonowski W, Varoneckas G, Szeles JC. Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation I - A Physiological Perspective. Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 9;13:854. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00854. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31447643BACKGROUNDHossain MB, Kong Y, Posada-Quintero HF, Chon KH. Comparison of Electrodermal Activity from Multiple Body Locations Based on Standard EDA Indices' Quality and Robustness against Motion Artifact. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;22(9):3177. doi: 10.3390/s22093177.
PMID: 35590866BACKGROUNDHirten RP, Lin KC, Whang J, Shahub S, Churcher NKM, Helmus D, Muthukumar S, Sands B, Prasad S. Longitudinal monitoring of IL-6 and CRP in inflammatory bowel disease using IBD-AWARE. Biosens Bioelectron X. 2024 Feb;16:100435. doi: 10.1016/j.biosx.2023.100435. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
PMID: 38317723BACKGROUNDFortenbaugh FC, DeGutis J, Esterman M. Recent theoretical, neural, and clinical advances in sustained attention research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 May;1396(1):70-91. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13318. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
PMID: 28260249BACKGROUNDEsterman M, Noonan SK, Rosenberg M, Degutis J. In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov;23(11):2712-23. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs261. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
PMID: 22941724BACKGROUNDEspinoza-Palavicino T, Mena-Chamorro P, Albayay J, Doussoulin A, Galvez-Garcia G. The use of transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation as an effective countermeasure for Simulator Adaptation Syndrome. Appl Ergon. 2023 Feb;107:103921. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103921. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
PMID: 36341733BACKGROUNDEren OE, Filippopulos F, Sonmez K, Mohwald K, Straube A, Schoberl F. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation significantly improves quality of life in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. J Neurol. 2018 Oct;265(Suppl 1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8894-8. Epub 2018 May 21.
PMID: 29785522BACKGROUNDDe Smet S, Ottaviani C, Verkuil B, Kappen M, Baeken C, Vanderhasselt MA. Effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive and autonomic correlates of perseverative cognition. Psychophysiology. 2023 Jun;60(6):e14250. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14250. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
PMID: 36683127BACKGROUNDColzato L, Beste C. A literature review on the neurophysiological underpinnings and cognitive effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: challenges and future directions. J Neurophysiol. 2020 May 1;123(5):1739-1755. doi: 10.1152/jn.00057.2020. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
PMID: 32208895BACKGROUNDChuang CC, Ye JJ, Lin WC, Lee KT, Tai YT. Photoplethysmography variability as an alternative approach to obtain heart rate variability information in chronic pain patient. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Dec;29(6):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9669-8. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PMID: 25708672BACKGROUNDCegarra J, Valery B, Avril E, Calmettes C, Navarro J. OpenMATB: A Multi-Attribute Task Battery promoting task customization, software extensibility and experiment replicability. Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):1980-1990. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01364-w.
PMID: 32140999BACKGROUNDBroncel A, Bocian R, Klos-Wojtczak P, Kulbat-Warycha K, Konopacki J. Vagal nerve stimulation as a promising tool in the improvement of cognitive disorders. Brain Res Bull. 2020 Feb;155:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
PMID: 31790720BACKGROUNDBaxter AL, Watcha MF, Baxter WV, Leong T, Wyatt MM. Development and validation of a pictorial nausea rating scale for children. Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):e1542-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1410. Epub 2011 May 29.
PMID: 21624874BACKGROUNDBadran BW, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, Brown JC, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, George MS. Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: A concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
PMID: 29361441BACKGROUNDBabic T, Browning KN. The role of vagal neurocircuits in the regulation of nausea and vomiting. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 5;722:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.047. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PMID: 24184670BACKGROUNDArmstrong T, Olatunji BO. Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Dec;32(8):704-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
PMID: 23059623BACKGROUNDAllen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007 Mar;28(3):R1-39. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/3/R01. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
PMID: 17322588BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Musa Mahmood, PhD
OpenBCI
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zoe Steine-Hanson, PhD
OpenBCI
- STUDY CHAIR
Alejandro Covalin, PhD
Spark Biomedical
- STUDY CHAIR
Navid Khodaparast, PhD
Spark Biomedical
- STUDY CHAIR
Conor Russomanno, Masters
OpenBCI
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, research assistants and study investigator will be blind. Only the study coordinator will be aware of research groups.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2025
First Posted
January 17, 2025
Study Start
April 30, 2025
Primary Completion
August 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share