Motion Fidelity Effects With Mixed-Reality
Effects of Simulator Motion Fidelity on Pilot Performance While Using a Mixed-Reality Headset
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to investigate how different levels of simulator motion fidelity affect pilot performance in two different flight tasks while using a head mounted display (or mixed-reality headset) for out-the-window (OTW) visuals. Three levels of motion fidelity will be studied: 1) no motion, 2) small hexapod motion, and 3) one-to-one vehicle motion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2025
CompletedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
11 days
June 5, 2025
April 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time to Complete Flight Task Maneuver (Averaged over Repetitions)
Time needed to complete (a portion of) the flight task measured against desired and adequate performance criteria: Heliport Approach Task - Battery time remaining (desired \>=20:00 min, adequate \>=19:40 min) Lateral Reposition and Hold Task \- Reposition completion time (desired \<=25 s, adequate \<=35 s)
Day 1
Accuracy of the Flight Task Maneuver (Averaged over Repetitions)
Accuracy of the maneuver during (a portion of) the flight task measured against desired and adequate performance criteria: Heliport Approach Task * Glideslope deviation (desired +-0.7 deg, adequate +-2.1 deg) * Localizer deviation (desired +-0.7 deg, adequate +-2.1 deg) * Helipad boundary crossing height (desired +-10 ft, adequate +-20 ft) * Helipad boundary crossing speed (desired +-5 kts, adequate +-10 kts) * Helipad center deviation (desired +-20 ft, adequate +-60 ft) Lateral Reposition and Hold Task * Ground track deviation (desired +-5 ft, adequate +-10 ft) * Target ground speed deviation (desired +-5 kts, adequate +-8 kts) * Altitude deviation (desired +-5 ft, adequate +-10 ft) * Heading deviation (desired +-10 deg, adequate +-15 deg) * Hover point lateral and longitudinal deviation (desired +-5 ft, adequate +-10 ft)
Day 1
Motion Fidelity Rating
Possible answers are: Low Fidelity, Medium Fidelity, High Fidelity
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ)
Day 1
Study Arms (1)
Simulator Motion Variations
EXPERIMENTAL2 flight tasks; 4 motion conditions; 3 repetitions per condition (n = 12 per task)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Normal or corrected to normal vision.
You may not qualify if:
- Claustrophobia.
- Susceptible to motion sickness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NASA Ames Research Center, Vertical Motion Simulator
Mountain View, California, 94035, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2025
First Posted
August 19, 2025
Study Start
May 19, 2025
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
May 30, 2025
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share