The Use of CCK vs PS in Revision TKAs
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Constrained Condylar vs Posterior Stabilized Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2038
November 14, 2025
November 1, 2025
3 years
January 3, 2025
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Clinical patient reported outcomes
patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
6 weeks post op
Clinical patient reported outcomes
Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
1 year post op
Clinical patient reported outcomes
Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
2 year post op
Clinical patient reported outcomes
Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
5 year post op
Clinical patient reported outcomes
Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
10 year post op
Clinical patient reported outcomes
Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)
20 year post op
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Clinical reported outcomes (Koos Jr)
6 weeks to 20 years post op
Range of motion over time
pre op to 20 years pots op
Clinical reported outcomes ( VR-12)
6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years post op
Clinical reported outcomes ( Forgotten Joint Score)
6 weeks to 20 years post op
Clinical reported outcomes (EQ-5D-3L)
6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years post op
Study Arms (2)
Constrained condylar (CCK)
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce patient meets inclusion criteria, they'll be randomized prior to surgery to a specific CCK implant design. All surgeries will be done at the approved hospital or ASC and if the allocated component isn't used, the patient will still be followed post operatively and remain in the study.
Posterior Stabilized (PS) bearing
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnce patient meets inclusion criteria, they'll be randomized prior to surgery to a specific PS implant design. All surgeries will be done at the approved hospital or ASC and if the allocated component isn't used, the patient will still be followed post operatively and remain in the study.
Interventions
Patients in this intervention will receive a CCK bearing component
Patients in this intervention will receive a PS bearing component
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between 18-80 years of age
- Patients who are undergoing both femoral and tibial component revisions, or isolated femoral component revisions with a retained tibial component that is compatible with PS or CCK bearings
- Patients who are at least 6-weeks out from primary TKA surgery, with complete pre-operative and post-operative knee radiographs obtained at standard of care perioperative visits (AP/lateral and patellar views)
- Patients undergoing rTKA for indications including aseptic component loosening, flexion or extension coronal or sagittal instability, component malalignment, arthrofibrosis, patellar maltracking, reimplantation following single or two-stage exchange revision for prosthetic joint infection or bearing surface wear when femoral or tibial component revision is indicated.
- The use of revision total knee arthroplasty systems which have PS and CCK bearing options including different degree options of coronal and rotational constraint (to be individually randomized per constrained option):
- Zimmer Biomet Persona, NexGen, or Vanguard
- Smith and Nephew Legion
- DJO / Enovis Empowr
- Stryker Triathlon
- Link SymphoKnee
- Depuy Attune sion Criteria:
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing rTKA with a hinged implant, or pre-operatively determined to require CCK bearing rTKA, \> 80 years of age, or those requiring rTKA less than 6-weeks from the primary TKA,
- Patients undergoing rTKA for bearing exchange only rTKA, isolated tibial component rTKA
- Patients with pre-operative diagnosis of extensor mechanism disruption or collateral ligament incompetence or with a compromised soft tissue envelope requiring pre-pre-operative plastic surgery evaluation and planned soft tissue coverage.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- only the patient is blinded ahead of time
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2025
First Posted
January 17, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2038
Last Updated
November 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share