NCT06782295

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the clinical impact of Constrained Condylar versus Posterior Stabilized Knee (PS) bearings on patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes including mid-term survivorship among patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
148mo left

Started Jul 2025

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress7%
Jul 2025Jul 2038

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 17, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2028

Expected
10 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2038

Last Updated

November 14, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

January 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

revision total knee replacementcckpscoronal instabilitysagittal instability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    6 weeks post op

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    1 year post op

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    2 year post op

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    5 year post op

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    10 year post op

  • Clinical patient reported outcomes

    Patients will be asked pre and post operatively to completed standard of care patient reported outcomes to compare over time. The clinical patient reported outcomes of a revision total knee replacement to detect a 6-point difference in knee society score (KSS)

    20 year post op

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Clinical reported outcomes (Koos Jr)

    6 weeks to 20 years post op

  • Range of motion over time

    pre op to 20 years pots op

  • Clinical reported outcomes ( VR-12)

    6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years post op

  • Clinical reported outcomes ( Forgotten Joint Score)

    6 weeks to 20 years post op

  • Clinical reported outcomes (EQ-5D-3L)

    6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years post op

Study Arms (2)

Constrained condylar (CCK)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once patient meets inclusion criteria, they'll be randomized prior to surgery to a specific CCK implant design. All surgeries will be done at the approved hospital or ASC and if the allocated component isn't used, the patient will still be followed post operatively and remain in the study.

Device: Constrained Condylar bearing

Posterior Stabilized (PS) bearing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Once patient meets inclusion criteria, they'll be randomized prior to surgery to a specific PS implant design. All surgeries will be done at the approved hospital or ASC and if the allocated component isn't used, the patient will still be followed post operatively and remain in the study.

Device: posterior stabilized bearing

Interventions

Patients in this intervention will receive a CCK bearing component

Also known as: CCK
Constrained condylar (CCK)

Patients in this intervention will receive a PS bearing component

Posterior Stabilized (PS) bearing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients between 18-80 years of age
  • Patients who are undergoing both femoral and tibial component revisions, or isolated femoral component revisions with a retained tibial component that is compatible with PS or CCK bearings
  • Patients who are at least 6-weeks out from primary TKA surgery, with complete pre-operative and post-operative knee radiographs obtained at standard of care perioperative visits (AP/lateral and patellar views)
  • Patients undergoing rTKA for indications including aseptic component loosening, flexion or extension coronal or sagittal instability, component malalignment, arthrofibrosis, patellar maltracking, reimplantation following single or two-stage exchange revision for prosthetic joint infection or bearing surface wear when femoral or tibial component revision is indicated.
  • The use of revision total knee arthroplasty systems which have PS and CCK bearing options including different degree options of coronal and rotational constraint (to be individually randomized per constrained option):
  • Zimmer Biomet Persona, NexGen, or Vanguard
  • Smith and Nephew Legion
  • DJO / Enovis Empowr
  • Stryker Triathlon
  • Link SymphoKnee
  • Depuy Attune sion Criteria:

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing rTKA with a hinged implant, or pre-operatively determined to require CCK bearing rTKA, \> 80 years of age, or those requiring rTKA less than 6-weeks from the primary TKA,
  • Patients undergoing rTKA for bearing exchange only rTKA, isolated tibial component rTKA
  • Patients with pre-operative diagnosis of extensor mechanism disruption or collateral ligament incompetence or with a compromised soft tissue envelope requiring pre-pre-operative plastic surgery evaluation and planned soft tissue coverage.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
only the patient is blinded ahead of time
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial with two groups: constrained condylar (CCK) vs posterior stabilized (PS) articulating bearings. These are standard bearings used in revision knees, comparing two types.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2025

First Posted

January 17, 2025

Study Start

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2038

Last Updated

November 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations