Effects of Trunk-Focused Rehabilitation on Spinal Mobility, Trunk Control, and Hand Functions in Cerebral Palsy
Serebral Palsili Adölesanlarda Gövde Odaklı Rehabilitasyonun Spinal Mobilite, Gövde Kontrolü ve El Fonksiyonları Üzerine Etkilerinin İncelenmesi
3 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Main Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effects of trunk-focused rehabilitation on trunk control, spinal mobility, and manual skills in adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). Secondary Purpose: To investigate its effects on functional health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2025
CompletedFebruary 7, 2025
August 1, 2024
1 year
January 13, 2025
February 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Evaluation of Trunk Control
Trunk Impairment Scale: It consists of coordination, dynamic and static sections. In the static section, the responses in actively and passively crossing the legs with the feet in a supported position are recorded. In the dynamic section, unilateral hip movements and lateral flexion of the trunk are evaluated. In the coordination section, the upper and lower body are asked to move. Coordination consists of dynamic and static sections. The maximum scores that can be obtained from the tests are 7 for the static section, 10 for the dynamic section, and 6 for the coordination section. The score range is 0-23. The total score for TIS ranges between 0 for a minimal performance to 23 for a perfect performance.
at baseline and week 9
Evaluation of Spinal Mobility
Spinal Mobility and Alignment Assessment (Sagittal Plane): Spinal Mouse (SM) measurements are taken at the same time of day, in an environment where the patient is resting, distrubating their weight equally between their two feet as much as possible, and standing symmetrically, while the patient is standing upright in an anatomical position, by moving downwards at a constant speed over the SM spinal criterion points (from C7 spinous process to S3) by the physiotherapist. The spine is measured 3 times in the sagittal plane. The average value of the measurements is used for analysis.
at baseline and week 12
Evaluation of Hand Functions
Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT): Writing, card turning, picking up small objects, large and heavy objects skills and durations are assessed in both hands. 7 items are repeated for both hands. The completion time of each task is recorded separately. The score for the subtest is equal to the time in seconds required to complete the task, the maximum score for the subtest is 120. The total score is equal to the sum of points for all subtests and is calculated separately for each hand. The lower the score, the better the child's hand function.
at baseline and week 9
Secondary Outcomes (2)
1 Minute Walking Test (1-MWT):
at baseline and week 9
Pediatric Data Collection Tool (PODCI)
at baseline and week 9
Study Arms (2)
Trunk Focused Rehabilitation (TFR) plus Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) Group
EXPERIMENTAL1\. Abdominal stabilization progression for TFR is applied to all cases with simultaneous breathing exercises for 8 weeks (24 sessions in total) (8). Exercises are performed 3 days a week, 45 minutes a day, starting from warm-up and recumbent position respectively, and the intensity is adjusted individually by observing tone and motivation. The experimental group's routine physiotherapists also gave them a conventional rehabilitation program (the same protocol as in the active comparison arm) for 40 minutes per day, 2 days per week.
Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group is the group that receives conventional treatment 2 days a week, 40 minutes per session. Conventional Rehabilitation Program Content: All sessions include the following rehabilitation program, supervised by a physiotherapist and individualized according to tolerance. Number of exercise repetitions: 10-20. The intensity is adjusted by observing motivation.
Interventions
Abdominal stabilization progression for TFR is applied with simultaneous breathing exercise for 3 days a week, 45 minutes a day, 8 weeks (24 sessions in total)(8). 1. Basic Abdominal Stabilization Training, Task-Focused Exercises (without spinal diagonal and rotational components)(8,12). Warm-up: 5 minutes, Global Stretching and Relaxation(9,10,11). Extremity load, elastic band, and unstable surface are added as stabilization is achieved in neurodevelopmental positions. Task-oriented exercises(12). Cooling Down: Warm-up exercises are repeated. 2. General Posture and Asymmetry Training Brochure (includes adolescent, family, and team members)(13-17). The exercise starts with 3 seconds and gradually progresses to 10 seconds, 10 repetitions, and 3 sets. The TFR group also receives Conventional Treatment 2 days a week, 40 minutes per day, for 8 weeks. The same treatment protocol is applied as the control group). Routine physiotherapists apply conventional treatment.
Conventional treatment is applied to the group, 2 days a week, 40 minutes each session, for 8 weeks. It is an intervention performed by a physiotherapist who regularly follows up in a special education and rehabilitation center. 1. Normal Joint Movement (NEH) 2. Stretching for the lower, and upper extremities and around the hips 3. Lying activities 4. Curl up (assisted, unaided) 5. Bridging exercise, cat camel exercise, posterior pelvic tilt exercise 6. Walking training 7. Climbing and descending stairs 8. Weight transfer exercises at standing, sitting
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Levels 1 and 2 according to Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
- Viking Speech Scale Turkish version/(VSS-T) 1-2 level, understood to speak and able to take commands
- Adolescents with CP between the ages of 12-18
- Those whose guardian / legal representative and themselves have received an Informed Voluntary Consent Form
- No hip dislocation
- Scoliosis below 25 degrees according to the radiographic evaluation made in the last 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Having had any surgery related to the intrathecal baclofen pump
- Having botulinum toxin injection treatment or orthopedic surgery within the last 6 months
- Having severe vision, hearing, and cognitive deficiencies
- Acute medical illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Sacettin Gürbüz Barrier-Free Life Center (General name of the campus.) /*Private Etimesgut Barrier-Free Life Special Education and Rehabilitation Center
Ankara, Etimesgut, 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)
Private Etimesgut Kardelen Special Education and Rehabilitation Center
Ankara, Etimesgut, 06794, Turkey (Türkiye)
SERÇEV Barrier-Free and Vocational Technical Anatolian High School
Ankara, Çankaya, 06810, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (12)
1. Giannoni P, Zerbino L. Cerebral Palsy: A Practical Guide for Rehabilitation Professionals. Springer International Publishing; 2022. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=apxhEAAAQBAJ
BACKGROUNDDewar R, Love S, Johnston LM. Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jun;57(6):504-20. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12660. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
PMID: 25523410BACKGROUND3. Akbaş AN, Günel MK. Effects of individually structured trunk training on body function and structures in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A stratified randomized controlled trial. In: Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. Turkish Physiotherapy Association; 2019;30(1) 11-22.
BACKGROUNDRuthard K, Raabe-Oetker A, Ruthard J, Oppermann T, Duran I, Schonau E. Reliability of a radiation-free, noninvasive and computer-assisted assessment of the spine in children with cerebral palsy. Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):937-942. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06328-4. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
PMID: 32036426BACKGROUNDPierret J, Beyaert C, Vasa R, Rumilly E, Paysant J, Caudron S. Rehabilitation of Postural Control and Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy: the Beneficial Effects of Trunk-Focused Postural Activities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2023 Apr;26(3):180-192. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2023.2193269. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
PMID: 36959769BACKGROUNDTalgeri AJ, Nayak A, Karnad SD, Jain P, Tedla JS, Reddy RS, Sangadala DR. Effect of Trunk Targeted Interventions on Functional Outcomes in Children with Cerebral Palsy- A Systematic Review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2023 Apr;26(3):193-205. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2023.2193265. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
PMID: 37021364BACKGROUNDFaccioli S, Pagliano E, Ferrari A, Maghini C, Siani MF, Sgherri G, Cappetta G, Borelli G, Farella GM, Foscan M, Vigano M, Sghedoni S, Perazza S, Sassi S. Evidence-based management and motor rehabilitation of cerebral palsy children and adolescents: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2023 May 25;14:1171224. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1171224. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37305763BACKGROUND8. Kisner, C., Colby, L. A., Borstad, J. (2022). Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. United States: F.A. Davis.
BACKGROUNDMonticone M, Ambrosini E, Cazzaniga D, Rocca B, Ferrante S. Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1204-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3241-y. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
PMID: 24682356BACKGROUND11. Martin, S. C.(2018). Spinal Asymmetry and Scoliosis: Movement and Function Solutions for the Spine, Ribcage and Pelvis. p. 213. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
BACKGROUND15. Mendoza, A. et all. (Ed) (2023, July 20).
BACKGROUND13. Lenhert-Schroth, C. (2007). The Schroth scoliosis three dimensional treatment. Books on Demand GmbH. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=D0gQAQAAMAAJ&dq=9780914959021,&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibwbfyp82JAxV_RfEDHZbSG3IQ6AF6BAgGEAI
BACKGROUND
Related Links
- 1\. Giannoni, P., \& Zerbino, L. (2022). Cerebral Palsy: A Practical Guide for Rehabilitation Professionals. In Google Books. Springer Nature. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=apxhEAAAQBAJ
- 2\. Dewar, R., Love, S., \& Johnston, L. M. (2015). Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 57(6), 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12660
- 3\. Numanoğlu Akbaş, A., \& Kerem Günel, M. (2019). EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUALLY STRUCTURED TRUNK TRAINING ON BODY FUNCTION AND STRUCTURES IN CHILDREN WITH SPASTIC CEREBRAL PALSY: A STRATIFIED RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 30(1),11-22
- 4\. Ruthard, Kristina et al. "Reliability of a radiation-free, noninvasive and computer-assisted assessment of the spine in children with cerebral palsy." European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society.
- 5\. Pierret, Jonathan et al. "Rehabilitation of Postural Control and Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy: the Beneficial Effects of Trunk-Focused Postural Activities." Developmental neurorehabilitation vol. 26,3 (2023): 180-192. doi:10.1080/17518423.2023
- 6\. Faccioli, S., Pagliano, E., Ferrari, A., Maghini, C., Siani, M. F., Sgherri, G., Cappetta, G., Borelli, G., Farella, G. M., Foscan, M., Viganò, M., Sghedoni, S., Perazza, S., \& Sassi, S. (2023). Evidence-based management and motor rehabilitation of ce
- 7\. Talgeri, A. J., Nayak, A., Karnad, S. D., Jain, P., Tedla, J. S., Reddy, R. S., \& Sangadala, D. R. (2023). Effect of Trunk Targeted Interventions on Functional Outcomes in Children with Cerebral Palsy- A Systematic Review. Developmental neurorehabilit
- 8\. Kisner, C., Colby, L. A., \& Borstad, J. (2022). Therapeutic Exercise : Foundations and Techniques. In Google Books. F.A. Davis. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=xKegEAAAQBAJ
- 9\. Schroth, C. L. (2007). Three-Dimensional Treatment for scoliosis: a physiotherapeutic method for deformities of the spine: 9780914959021: Medicine \& Health Science Books @ Amazon.com (C. Mohr, A. Reeves, \& D. A. Smith, Trans.; 1st English edition). Th
- 10\. Kuru Çolak, T., Akçay, B., \& Apti, A. (2020). Skolyoz Tedavisinde Schroth Yöntemi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.601264
- 11\. Esquerdo, O. M. (2016). Stretching Exercises Encyclopedia. In Google Books: Vol. p. 52 (illustrated ed.). Meyer \& Meyer Verlag. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=3-TvkJgmE6cC\&source=gbs\_navlinks\_s
- 12\. Monticone, M., Ambrosini, E., Cazzaniga, D., Rocca, B., \& Ferrante, S. (2014). Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of a
- 13\. Kotwicki, T., \& Grivas, T. B. (2012). Research into spinal deformities 8.
- 14\. Martin, S. C. (2018). Spinal Asymmetry and Scoliosis: movement and function solutions for the spine, ribcage and pelvis. In Google Books: Vol. p.213 (illustrated ed.). Jessica Kingsley Publishers. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=hJhsvgAACAAJ
- 15\. Mendoza et all, 2023, para.1-4.
- 16\. Monroe, M. (2012). Yoga and Scoliosis: A Journey to Health and Healing (16pt Large Print Edition). ReadHowYouWant.
- 17\. Krentzman, R. (2016). Scoliosis, Yoga Therapy, and the Art of Letting Go. Birleşik Krallık: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.p.53-57
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seval KUTLUTÜRK YIKILMAZ, PhD
University of Health Sciences Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Orçun TOKTAŞ, Op. Dr
Etimesgut Şehit Sait Ertürk State Hospital Orthopedics and Traumatology.
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gül EVDALI, MScPT
University of Health Sciences Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2025
First Posted
January 17, 2025
Study Start
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion
May 25, 2025
Study Completion
June 25, 2025
Last Updated
February 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share