NCT06776445

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gabapentin works to treat flushing/erythema associated with rosacea. It will also learn about the safety of drug Gabapentin. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does drug Gabapentin reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea?
  • What medical problems do participants have when taking drug Gabapentin? Researchers will compare Gabapentin to a positive control (minocycline plus hydroxychloroquine, a first-line treatment for rosacea) to see if drug Gabapentin works to reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 5, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 15, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 5, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

rosacea

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the score of CEA ( Clinician Erythema Assessment )

    The reduction of the CEA score was compared before treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment. The CEA score was assessed by a scale, 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 =Mild, 3= Moderate,4= Severe.

    4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment

Study Arms (3)

minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine

gabapentin 300mg bid

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: gabapentin 300mg bid

gabapentin 300mg tid

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: gabapentin 300mg tid

Interventions

Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed

gabapentin 300mg bid

Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed

gabapentin 300mg tid

Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed

minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Initial treatment in our hospital; ② Diagnosed by two experienced dermatologists and in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the National Rosacea Society (NRS) Expert Committee \[38\], unconscious disorder and no communication disorder; ③ did not receive any other form of treatment within 4 weeks; ④ Patients who were followed up for 8 weeks or more and had complete clinical data; ⑤ Informed consent was signed before treatment, and the clinical data were agreed to be used for scientific research

You may not qualify if:

  • ① received other treatment within 4 weeks of this treatment; ② facial flushing caused by other diseases and local irritation; ③ Patients with contraindication to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin and carvedilol; ④ Unable to complete follow-up and serum specimen collection; ○5 patients were intolerant to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine and carvedilol; ○6 Lactation, pregnancy, liver and kidney dysfunction, psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic diseases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing, 404100, China

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Del Rosso JQ, Webster G, Weiss JS, Bhatia ND, Gold LS, Kircik L. Nonantibiotic Properties of Tetracyclines in Rosacea and Their Clinical Implications. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):14-21. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

  • Ma G, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Yuan X, Zhou Z, Jian D, Zhao Z, Wang B, Li J. Gabapentin improves the flushing of rosacea, but not other rosacea symptoms or quality of life: Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):920-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 15. No abstract available.

  • Wei J, Wan M, Chen Q, Fu J, Yang L, Ni R, Ge L, Dan Y, Chen X, Kong M, Li L, Chen S, Yang S, Zhang L, Xia A, Tang L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Song Z, Li J. Gabapentin is an efficacy treatment for facial flushing and erythema of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):927-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 20. No abstract available.

  • Logger JGM, Olydam JI, Driessen RJB. Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: A systematic review and update on proposed mode of action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Oct;83(4):1088-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.129. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

  • Husein-ElAhmed H, Steinhoff M. Evaluation of the efficacy of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline in rosacea: a systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analysis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):7-17. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14247. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

  • Clanner-Engelshofen BM, Bernhard D, Dargatz S, Flaig MJ, Gieler U, Kinberger M, Klovekorn W, Kuna AC, Lauchli S, Lehmann P, Nast A, Pleyer U, Schaller M, Schofer H, Steinhoff M, Schwennesen T, Werner RN, Zierhut M, Reinholz M. S2k guideline: Rosacea. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022 Aug;20(8):1147-1165. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14849. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

  • Tu KY, Jung CJ, Shih YH, Chang ALS. Therapeutic strategies focusing on immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation in rosacea. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1403798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1403798. eCollection 2024.

  • Barakji YA, Ronnstad ATM, Christensen MO, Zachariae C, Wienholtz NKF, Halling AS, Maul JT, Thomsen SF, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Assessment of Frequency of Rosacea Subtypes in Patients With Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jun 1;158(6):617-625. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0526.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rosacea

Interventions

HydroxychloroquineGabapentinBID protein, human

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ChloroquineAminoquinolinesQuinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAminesOrganic Chemicalsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsAcids, CarbocyclicCyclohexanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Posted

January 15, 2025

Study Start

January 5, 2024

Primary Completion

July 31, 2025

Study Completion

July 31, 2025

Last Updated

January 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations