Assessment of Shoulder Rehabilitation Practices and Documentation Protocols at Riphah Rehabilitation Center
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate Riphah Rehabilitation Center's shoulder rehabilitation procedures and documentation guidelines. The study will specifically assess the efficacy of shoulder rehabilitation procedures, their methodology, and the techniques employed to record patient improvement. In order to make sure the centre adheres to best practices, improves patient care, and keeps accurate records for better treatment outcomes, the study intends to identify areas of strength and potential improvements in both the rehabilitation techniques and documentation processes. The evaluation's findings will improve the center's operational effectiveness and clinical practices. Target Audience:Healthcare Professionals (such as physicians, physiotherapists, and rehabilitation therapists): This study will assist guide evidence-based strategies for managing shoulder injuries and offer insights into contemporary rehabilitation procedures. Centre Administration: For better patient care, resource management, and operational efficiency, the results will point out areas where documentation and treatment protocols should be strengthened. Patients and Families: In the end, the study will improve rehabilitation results, increasing the likelihood that patients will heal from shoulder injuries more quickly and completely.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2025
CompletedJanuary 14, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.9 years
July 9, 2024
January 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Severity During Shoulder Rehabilitation Treatment
Pain severity will be assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Both groups will receive 2 treatment sessions per week. Pain assessments will be made at baseline (pre-intervention) and at the end of the 4-week intervention (post-intervention) to evaluate changes in pain severity. Measurement Unit: Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), where 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain.
Baseline and 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Study Arms (2)
GROUP A:Rehabilitation Practices Group:
Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and quality of shoulder rehabilitation practices. Data Collection, Observation of rehabilitation sessions: Record types of exercises, therapy techniques, patient engagement, and therapist-patient interactions. Interviews with rehabilitation professionals: Gather insights into their approaches, challenges faced, and perceived effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies. Analysis: Assess adherence to established rehabilitation protocols. Evaluate patient outcomes such as pain levels, range of motion, and functional status. Compare observed practices with evidence-based guidelines for shoulder rehabilitation. Findings: Identify strengths and weaknesses in current rehabilitation practices. Highlight areas where improvements or modifications may be necessary.
GROUP B:Documentation Protocols Group
Objective: Assess the completeness, accuracy, and organization of documentation related to shoulder rehabilitation. Data Collection: Review of patient records and documentation: Evaluate the quality and consistency of documentation practices, including initial evaluations, progress notes, and discharge summaries. Interviews with rehabilitation staff: Collect feedback on documentation protocols, challenges encountered, and perceived adequacy of documentation practices. Analysis: Assess the clarity and comprehensiveness of documentation. Evaluate adherence to documentation protocols and standards. Identify any deficiencies or inconsistencies in documentation practices. Findings: Highlight strengths and weaknesses in current documentation protocols. Identify areas for improvement, such as standardizing documentation templates or providing training on effective documentation practices. Recommendations: Propose strategies to enhance documentation quality and consistency.
Interventions
Evidence-Based Training Program:Develop a structured training program for rehabilitation professionals focusing on evidence-based shoulder rehabilitation practices. Clinical Mentorship and Supervision:Implement a mentorship program where experienced rehabilitation professionals provide guidance and support to junior staff members. Standardization of Rehabilitation Protocols:Review and standardize rehabilitation protocols for common shoulder conditions based on current evidence and best practices. Patient-Centered Care Approach:Adopt a patient-centered approach to shoulder rehabilitation, emphasizing shared decision-making and individualized treatment plans Outcome Monitoring and Quality Improvement:Use standardized outcome measures to evaluate improvements in pain, function, range of motion, and patient satisfaction.
Training and Education Program:Develop and implement a training program for rehabilitation professionals aimed at enhancing their knowledge and skills in shoulder rehabilitation practices and documentation protocols. Standardization of Protocols:Review and update existing rehabilitation protocols to ensure alignment with current evidence-based guidelines and best practices. Quality Assurance Measures:Establish a system for ongoing monitoring and evaluation of shoulder rehabilitation practices and documentation protocols. Patient Education and Engagement:Develop educational materials and resources for patients undergoing shoulder rehabilitation to enhance their understanding of treatment goals, exercises, and self-management strategies. Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation:Implement a system for monitoring and evaluating patient outcomes, including pain levels, range of motion, functional status, and satisfaction with rehabilitation services.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients Undergoing Shoulder Rehabilitation: Include patients who have undergone or are currently undergoing rehabilitation specifically for shoulder injuries, conditions, or surgeries. Consider both inpatients and outpatients receiving rehabilitation services at Rphah Rehabilitation Center.
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing shoulder rehabilitation at Rphah Rehabilitation Center.
- Rehabilitation protocols implemented within the center.
- Documented cases with sufficient information for analysis.
- Both acute and chronic shoulder conditions
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with shoulder conditions not requiring rehabilitation.
- Cases lacking adequate documentation.
- Rehabilitation protocols not specific to shoulder conditions.
- Patients with comorbidities significantly affecting rehabilitation outcomes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Riphah Rehabilitation Center
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Riphah Rehabilitation Center
Lahore, 54840, Pakistan
Related Publications (4)
Smith BA, Fields CJ, Fernandez N. Physical therapists make accurate and appropriate discharge recommendations for patients who are acutely ill. Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):693-703. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090164. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
PMID: 20299410BACKGROUNDScalzitti DA. On
BACKGROUNDDe Villers MJ. Documentation of preventive education and screening for osteoporosis. Outcomes Manag. 2003 Jan-Mar;7(1):28-32.
PMID: 12593123BACKGROUNDAjami S, Arab-Chadegani R. Barriers to implement Electronic Health Records (EHRs). Mater Sociomed. 2013;25(3):213-5. doi: 10.5455/msm.2013.25.213-215.
PMID: 24167440BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Hashim
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2024
First Posted
January 14, 2025
Study Start
January 26, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share