Comparison of IMES Versus DN on ATrPs of AC
Comparison of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Versus Dry Needling on Active Trigger Points of Adhesive Capsulitis
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of our study to compare DN and IMES for pressure pain threshold, ROM and the shoulder function in active trigger points with adhesive capsulitis. This study will add to the growing body of knowledge that if these two techniques yield comparable outcomes and if one technique is superior to the other, which should be the alternative of therapy. Moreover, it would add to the society as there are very limited researches done in Pakistan using needling for trigger points in adhesive capsulitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2024
CompletedJanuary 30, 2025
January 1, 2025
6 months
March 4, 2024
January 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Algometer (pressure pain threshold)
This tool can be used to assess the participant pressure pain at baseline ,2nd week,3rd week post assessment. Pressure pain threshold is measured at active trigger point at subscapularis, deltoid (ant, middle, post), latissimus dorsi, teres minor, supraspinatus. The PPT are measured by mean and standard deviation kg\\cm2
3rd week
Secondary Outcomes (5)
ROM Shoulder (Flexion)
3rd week
ROM Shoulder (Abduction)
3rd week
ROM Shoulder (External rotation)
3rd week
ROM Shoulder (Internal Rotation)
3rd week
American shoulder and elbow surgeons scale
3rd week
Study Arms (2)
Intramuscular Electrical stimulation
EXPERIMENTALMyofascial trigger point would be targeted by direct intramuscular electrical stimulation by using direct electrode placement method, where anode pole and the cathode pole of the stimulator connected to the needles of the MTrPs of the shoulder girdle muscles using the alligator clip connector in which both electrodes are on the muscle belly in which anode pole at proximal end and cathode pole at the distal end along the musculotendinous junction. The special programmed comfy stim (a double channeled multipurpose electrical stimulator) was used to deliver electrical impulses with following parameters; pulse duration 80µs, frequency 100HZ, and time duration for 10 min
Dry Needling
ACTIVE COMPARATORDN for the MTrPs will be performed over the identified trigger points locations at a suitable angle. The needles of suitable length and thickness (30-mm), depending on the depth of the MTrPs location inserted into the shoulder girdle muscles to deactivate the active MTrPs. Subsequently, the inserted needles moved to-and-fro direction to elicit the local twitch responses, which further reaffirms the ideal placement of needle into the MTrPs. After the twitch response obtained, the dry needles were kept within the muscles approximately for 10 minutes. Dry needling was performed subscapularis, latissimus dorsi, supraspinatus, deltoid, teres minor.
Interventions
AROM 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week, Shoulder strengthening exercises: Isometric pain free (elastic Thera-band) 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week, Maitland mobilization grade 3 and 4 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week Total of 6 session were given each consisting of 30min
Myofascial trigger point would be targeted by direct intramuscular electrical stimulation by using direct electrode placement method, where anode pole and the cathode pole of the stimulator connected to the needles of the MTrPs of the shoulder girdle muscles .AROM 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week, Shoulder strengthening exercises: Isometric pain free (elastic Thera-band) 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week, Maitland mobilization grade 3 and 4 10 repetitions ×2 set×30 sec ,6days\\week Total of 6 session were given each consisting of 30 min
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 40 to 60 year of both genders
- Diagnosed patients of stage 3 Adhesive capsulitis with type I and II diabetes
- Involvement of at least 3 shoulder girdle muscles in Active MTrPs (subscapularis, latissimus dorsi, deltoid (anterior, middle, posterior)
- Active MTrPs in shoulder girdle muscles (subscapularis, supraspinatus, deltoid (anterior, middle, posterior), teres minor, latissimus dorsi)
- Reproduction of the patient's symptoms at active trigger point, Taut band, Hypersensitive spot, Referred pain pattern, local twitch response
- Minimum 60 degrees of active/passive shoulder abduction range of movement.
You may not qualify if:
- Systemic inflammatory joint disease of shoulder joint (RA, OA polymyalgia rheumatic)
- Cerebral Vascular Accident
- Fibromyalgia, neurological deficits of upper limb (Nerve root entrapment, Cervical radiculopathy, Thoracic outlet syndrome)
- History of Fracture, Dislocation, Acute soft tissue injury, Acute bursitis
- Avascular necrosis of humeral head or visceral referred pain to shoulder
- Pregnancy, Hypothyroidism, skin infection
- Patients who are using Antiplatelet Therapy with in past 3 days of study
- Extreme fear of needles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Railway general hopsital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aneela zia, MS-OMPT
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- randomized
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
January 21, 2024
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
July 30, 2024
Last Updated
January 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share