Effectiveness of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol Vs a Mobilisation with Movement Protocol in Improving Ankle Dorsiflexion in Amateur Football Players
A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol Vs a Mobilisation with Movement Protocol in Improving Ankle Dorsiflexion in Amateur Football Players. Randomised Controlled Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To evaluate and compare the immediate and short-term effectiveness of a therapeutic exercise protocol and a mobilisation with movement protocol, compared with a control group, in improving ankle dorsiflexion in amateur footballers. Material and methods: A single-blind randomised controlled pilot study was developed. Participants were amateur football players randomized into 3 groups (therapeutic exercise, mobilization with movement and control). The intervention was carried out with 2 weekly sessions for 4 weeks. Assessment tools included the Ankle Lunge Test and the Single Leg Squat.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2025
CompletedJanuary 13, 2025
January 1, 2025
2 months
December 30, 2024
January 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ankle dorsiflexion with Ankle Lunge Test (ALT) using the LegMOtion© device.
ALT: ankle DF was measured in cm. The player stands with the foot to be assessed placed behind a black line on the device, while the other foot remains on the floor behind the tested foot. The player attempts to touch a metal rod with the knee without lifting the heel off the floor. The rod's position is adjusted to the maximum distance reached with difficulty. 3 repetitions were carried out and an average of the 3 repetitions was calculated to obtain the maximum ankle DF measurement. Both feet were measured.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Dynamic knee valgus with the Single Leg Squat (SLS) test.
4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Manual therapy group (MTG)
EXPERIMENTALThe MTG group received an intervention based on anterior-posterior mobilizations of the talus and fibula and taping, both based on Mulligan® techniques.
Therapeutic exercise group (EG)
EXPERIMENTALThe EG group underwent a therapeutic exercise protocol lasting approximately 5-10 minutes, performed before regular training sessions.
Control group (CG)
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe CG group received no specific treatment; they only participated in the current training sessions.
Interventions
The MTG group received an intervention based on anterior-posterior mobilizations of the talus and fibula and taping, both based on Mulligan® techniques Individually, participants received Grade IV passive mobilizations lasting approximately 30 seconds, totalling 12 active mobilizations performed by the participant. Furthermore, a tape was applied, placed on the anterior part of the talus with a posterior and caudal direction, with its ends anchored near the heel. Due to its placement, this taping maintained a sustained posterior force on the talus throughout the training session. This intervention was conducted on the affected limb(s) with DF deficits.
Therapeutic exercise protocol lasting approximately 5-10 minutes, performed before regular training sessions. It included 2 exercises, each performed in 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 1-minute rest intervals. Exercise 1: Weighted DF in a kneeling position. From this position, ankle DF is performed with the front leg, on which the weight of the arms and the torso is placed to force the movement. Exercise 2: Ankle lunge with band resistance at the ankle. The player performs ankle DF with a medium-resistance green Theraband® providing a posterior force vector on the talus. This intervention was applied to the affected limb(s) with ankle DF limitations and was supervised by a physiotherapist. It was performed before training session at each club's facilities.
The Control group received no specific treatment; they only participated in the current training sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Football players over 18 years old who train a minimum of 3 days a week.
- Football players with ankle DF less than 9 cm or a difference greater than 1.5 cm between both feet, measured with the Ankle Lunge Test (ALT) using the LegMOtion© device.
You may not qualify if:
- Players who, during the ALT, achieve less than 9 cm or a difference greater than 1.5 cm between both feet but reporting limitation due to tension in the gastrocnemius muscle.
- Those with serious traumatic or rheumatological conditions that may interfere with the study.
- Players who have participated in specific programs to improve ankle DF in the last 3 months.
- Players with a history of ankle-foot surgery within the last 6 months.
- Non-registered players training in those clubs.
- Players unable to arrive 20 minutes prior to the beginning of the training session.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Vigolead
- Iris Machado de Oliveiracollaborator
- Aldara Vázquez Méndezcollaborator
- Adrian Eiró Fernándezcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Vigo
Pontevedra, Pontevedra, 36005, Spain
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2024
First Posted
January 13, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion
February 2, 2024
Study Completion
March 2, 2024
Last Updated
January 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01