The Efficacy of Freehand, Pilot Drilled and Fully Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients: a Randomize Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates three different methods of dental implant surgery-freehand, pilot-drilled, and fully guided techniques-in patients with partial tooth loss (partial edentulism). Dental implants are widely used to restore missing teeth, but the success of these procedures depends heavily on accurate placement and surgical precision. The study involves 90 participants, divided into three groups of 30, each undergoing one of the three surgical techniques. The main goals are to compare surgery duration, implant placement accuracy, post-operative recovery, patient satisfaction, and long-term success rates. Key findings suggest that fully guided implant surgery offers the highest accuracy, the shortest recovery time, and the highest patient satisfaction. Pilot-drilled surgery also showed excellent results, providing a balance between precision and efficiency. Freehand surgery, while flexible, showed slightly lower accuracy and higher complication rates. This research aims to guide patients and healthcare providers in selecting the most suitable implant surgery method for improved outcomes and long-term success in dental care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2025
CompletedJanuary 6, 2026
December 1, 2025
1 month
January 2, 2025
December 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy of Implant Placement
Accuracy of implant positioning will be assessed using postoperative radiographic imaging (CBCT) to measure deviations in angulation, depth, and position from the preoperative plan.
Immediately post-surgery
Postoperative Complication
Incidence of complications such as bleeding, infection, nerve damage, or soft tissue trauma will be recorded.
Within 2 weeks post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Surgery Duration
During the surgical procedure
Pain Levels
Days 1, 3, and 7 post-surgery
Implant Stability
At 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery
Study Arms (3)
Freehand Implant Surgery
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo implant placement using the freehand technique. This approach relies on the surgeon's clinical judgment and visual landmarks for implant positioning without the use of specialized guides.
Pilot-Drilled Implant Surgery
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo implant placement using the pilot-drilled technique. A pilot drill will be used to create an initial guided pathway for the implant, improving placement accuracy while allowing for some flexibility during the procedure.
Fully Guided Implant Surgery
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will undergo implant placement using the fully guided technique. This approach utilizes computer-aided surgical templates created from preoperative imaging to ensure precise implant positioning, angulation, and depth
Interventions
This intervention utilizes a pilot drill to create an initial guide hole for the implant. The pilot-drilled pathway improves accuracy while still allowing the surgeon flexibility during the procedure. The final implant is placed following sequential drilling.
This intervention employs computer-aided surgical templates created from preoperative imaging data, such as CBCT scans. These guides ensure precise implant positioning, angulation, and depth based on preoperative planning. The approach minimizes variability and enhances accuracy.
This intervention involves implant placement performed manually by the surgeon without the use of specialized guides. The procedure relies on the surgeon's clinical judgment and experience to determine the implant's positioning, angulation, and depth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-80 years.
- Patients with partial edentulism (missing one or more teeth in an otherwise dentate arch).
- Sufficient bone volume and quality to support implant placement without additional bone augmentation.
- Good overall health with no systemic contraindications for surgery.
- Willingness to provide informed consent and comply with the study protocol and follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic conditions (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases) that may affect healing or surgery outcomes.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Smokers or individuals with a history of poor compliance with post-operative care.
- Patients requiring additional bone grafting, sinus lifts, or complex augmentation procedures for implant placement.
- Active oral infections, untreated periodontal disease, or severe malocclusion that could interfere with implant placement or outcomes.
- Patients with a history of bisphosphonate use or other medications known to affect bone metabolism.
- Individuals with mental or physical conditions that would impair their ability to participate in the study or follow the protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Khalid University
Abhā, Saudi Arabia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2025
Study Start
January 6, 2024
Primary Completion
February 6, 2024
Study Completion
February 6, 2024
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns related to patient privacy and confidentiality. Although the study will follow rigorous data collection and management protocols, sharing raw participant data might compromise the anonymity and security of the participants' health information. Additionally, the data may be specific to the study design and not directly generalizable, limiting its applicability to external research.