Protein A immuNoaDsorption for the Treatment of Acute Episodes of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
PANDA
Protein A Immunoadsorption for the Treatment of Acute Episodes of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder:A Multicenter, Open-label, Superiority, Randomised Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To clarify the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption therapy for acute exacerbations of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD), we designed a multicenter, open-label, superiority randomized controlled clinical trial, planning to enroll 144 patients with NMOSD. We plan to treat patients with acute NMOSD using protein A immunoadsorption combined with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, and compare this with treatment using high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone alone. The aim is to observe the impact and safety of protein A immunoadsorption on the treatment efficacy for these patients experiencing acute exacerbations of NMOSD, ultimately providing more comprehensive clinical evidence to support treatment protocols for the acute phase of NMOSD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
April 30, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.7 years
December 15, 2024
April 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To assess the effectiveness of the treatment, the change in the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is evaluated one month after the start of treatment compared to the baseline. The baseline is defined as the patient's condition before
To assess the effectiveness of the treatment, the change in the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is evaluated one month after the start of treatment compared to the baseline. The baseline is defined as the patient's condition before treatment began, or if the patient had not yet reached a plateau during the initial treatment phase and continued to worsen during hospitalization, the most severe stage during the current hospitalization is used as the baseline.The EDSS is a scale used for the objective and repeatable quantification of disability in patients, with scores ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates normal function, while a score of 10 indicates death. An increase in the EDSS score reflects worsening symptoms.The method of evaluation involves calculating the EDSS score difference as follows: EDSS Score Difference = EDSS Score (Baseline) - EDSS Score (1 Month After Treatment Start).
Evaluation timing includes from the screening period to the baseline and the EDSS score assessment one month after starting treatment.
Study Arms (2)
experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group was treated with a combination of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous methylprednisolone. The methylprednisolone was administered following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day. Protein A immunoadsorption was conducted every other day, unless a physician determined that the patient's condition was unsuitable for treatment, in which case treatment was administered according to medical advice. A total of 5 treatments were given, with each session involving the regeneration of plasma at 1 to 3 times the plasma volume. Sequentially, the patients in this group were uniformly administered oral immunosuppressants, specifically azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day.Sequentially, the patients in this group were uniformly administered oral immunosuppressants, specifically azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Interventions
The experimental group was treated with a combination of protein A immunoadsorption and intravenous methylprednisolone. The methylprednisolone was administered following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day. Protein A immunoadsorption was conducted every other day, unless a physician determined that the patient's condition was unsuitable for treatment, in which case treatment was administered according to medical advice. A total of 5 treatments were given, with each session involving the regeneration of plasma at 1 to 3 times the plasma volume.
The control group was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, following a regimen of 1g for 5 days, 0.5g for 3 days, 0.25g for 2 days, and 0.12g for 1 day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical diagnosis of acute Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD)
- Age and Gender: Participants must be between 18 and 65 years old, inclusive, with no gender restrictions.
- Serological Marker: Participants must test positive for AQP4-IgG using the cell-based assay (CBA) method.
- Understanding and Consent: Participants or their legal representatives must be able to understand the study's purpose, demonstrate sufficient compliance with the study protocol, and sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Participants who cannot establish peripheral or central venous access, or have a history of allergic reactions to plasmapheresis.
- Participants with contraindications to intravenous methylprednisolone treatment.
- Participants who have used monoclonal antibodies in the last 6 months, or FcRn antagonists in the last 3 months.
- Participants who must use ACE inhibitors (ACEI) within 1 week before the start of treatment or during the study, and cannot discontinue their use.
- Severe Bleeding or Bleeding Disorders
- Severe Heart Failure
- Severe Infections
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 518000, China
Related Publications (6)
Li R, Wang J, Li C, Liu X, Chu M, Chang Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Yu B, Ling L, Yang H, Yang H, Hu X, Qiu W. Rescue immunoadsorption treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attacks unresponsive to intravenous methylprednisolone. J Neuroimmunol. 2021 Jul 15;356:577604. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577604. Epub 2021 May 7.
PMID: 33992860BACKGROUNDKleiter I, Gahlen A, Borisow N, Fischer K, Wernecke KD, Wegner B, Hellwig K, Pache F, Ruprecht K, Havla J, Krumbholz M, Kumpfel T, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Hemmer B, Angstwurm K, Stellmann JP, Schuster S, Stangel M, Lauda F, Tumani H, Mayer C, Zeltner L, Ziemann U, Linker R, Schwab M, Marziniak M, Then Bergh F, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Neuhaus O, Winkelmann A, Marouf W, Faiss J, Wildemann B, Paul F, Jarius S, Trebst C; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group. Neuromyelitis optica: Evaluation of 871 attacks and 1,153 treatment courses. Ann Neurol. 2016 Feb;79(2):206-16. doi: 10.1002/ana.24554. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
PMID: 26537743BACKGROUNDKleiter I, Gahlen A, Borisow N, Fischer K, Wernecke KD, Hellwig K, Pache F, Ruprecht K, Havla J, Kumpfel T, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Hemmer B, Angstwurm K, Stellmann JP, Schuster S, Stangel M, Lauda F, Tumani H, Mayer C, Krumbholz M, Zeltner L, Ziemann U, Linker R, Schwab M, Marziniak M, Then Bergh F, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Neuhaus O, Zettl UK, Faiss J, Wildemann B, Paul F, Jarius S, Trebst C; NEMOS (Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group). Apheresis therapies for NMOSD attacks: A retrospective study of 207 therapeutic interventions. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Sep 26;5(6):e504. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000504. eCollection 2018 Nov.
PMID: 30345331BACKGROUNDTrebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
PMID: 24272588BACKGROUNDLennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Weinshenker BG. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2004 Dec 11-17;364(9451):2106-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17551-X.
PMID: 15589308BACKGROUNDWingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, de Seze J, Fujihara K, Greenberg B, Jacob A, Jarius S, Lana-Peixoto M, Levy M, Simon JH, Tenembaum S, Traboulsee AL, Waters P, Wellik KE, Weinshenker BG; International Panel for NMO Diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):177-89. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26092914BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2024
First Posted
January 8, 2025
Study Start
April 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share