Reliability and Validity of Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale During Robot Therapy

NCT06756958 | Terminated

• 1 other identifier: NRC-2017-04-037
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 46
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 2

Brief Summary

Reliability and validity of Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale during robot therapy among patients with stroke

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

participation; robot; scale; rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale

  Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale could be 1 (none), 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 (excellent). Excellent (6): If the patient participated in all exercises or activities with maximal effort, finished all exercises or activities, and actively took interest in exercises or activities and/or future therapy sessions. None (1): patient refused entire session, or did not participate in any exercises or activities in session. In this study, a participant typically gets 12 sessions of robot assisted gait training. Just after the each session, Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale is assigned as 1 to 6. For example, in a virtual case, the participant gets the score of 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, and 6 (median =3.5). the participant gets 12 numbers of outcome score and median of Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale.

  through study completion, an average of 3 year

Secondary Outcomes (14)

• modified Barthel Index

  baseline and 4 weeks from baseline

• 10m walk

  baseline and 4 weeks from baseline

• Borg scale

  baseline and 4 weeks from baseline

• 6 min walk

  baseline and 4 weeks from baseline

• motricity index

  baseline and 4 weeks from baseline

Interventions

No intervention (observational study) OTHER

No intervention (observational study: The study participants were inpatient and were given robot-assisted gait training routinely.)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Those who participated the tethered-robot assisted gait training, had the history of brain lesion and adimitted in the rehabilitation center. Those who gave the informed consent about this study.

You may qualify if:

• patients with stroke or traumatic brain injury
• inpatient in rehabilitation center

You may not qualify if:

• brain tumor
• spinal cord injury

Sponsors & Collaborators

• National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea: lead

Study Sites (2)

National Rehabilitation Center

Seoul, 01022, South Korea

Location

Jung Hwan Kim

Seoul, 142884, South Korea

Location

Related Links

• Description site of the present study

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Observation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular Disorders; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Methods; Investigative Techniques

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER GOV
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Team manager

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 10, 2024
• First Posted: January 3, 2025
• Study Start: September 1, 2017
• Primary Completion: October 31, 2021
• Study Completion: October 31, 2021
• Last Updated: January 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

KR (2)