NCT06746454

Brief Summary

Feedback is incorporated into training programs to prevent injuries. The superiority of several feedback techniques is still debated and there is a need for gender specific studies. The main aim of the study was to investigate the gender-specific effectiveness of two different feedback techniques (combined verbal training with internal and external focus feedback and video training with instructional feedback) on the landing technique after vertical jump, frontal plane projection angle, and joint position sense in male and female volleyball players with asymptomatic knee valgus. In addition, the continuity of potential positive results in a retention test performed one week after the test session will be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 19, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 3, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

December 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

motor learningproprioceptionvolleyballknee valgusdrop vertical jump test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Measurement

    Two standard video cameras capture the frontal plane and sagittal plane view of each subject as they perform the test procedures (jumping from 30 cm height box). The participant's LESS score represents excellent (LESS score \<4), good (LESS score \>4 to 5), fair (LESS score \>5 to 6) and poor (LESS score \>6) jumping technique.

    baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Frontal Plan Projection Angle (FPPA) Measurement

    baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline

  • Knee Joint Position Sense (KJPS) Measurement

    baseline, immediately after the intervention, one week after the baseline

Study Arms (2)

Video Instructed Training Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Video Instructed Training Group Before the study is conducted, the expert video that will be used for the VI group instructions will be created. The expert video was created with an athlete with a LESS score of less than 4 and an FPPA of less than 10 who performs a DVJ task following the instructions. The video recording was used only for the video group instructions.

Other: Video Instructed Training Group

Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be given combined verbal instruction such as "Focus on how hard you push yourself off the ground after the jump and how quickly you straighten your knees during this push", in which internal and external focus directions were given simultaneously.

Other: Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group

Interventions

"Pre-test" measurements were taken to determine the baseline values of the athletes before the training packages specific to their group. The pre-test measurements included a landing error scoring system, knee position error sense, and frontal plane projection angle. After the pre-test measurements, 2 training packages with special instructions were performed for the video instructed training (VIT) group. The special instruction for the VIT group included a previously prepared video of a successful vertical jump landing task. This video was shown to the VIT group. Immediately after the training packages, post-test measurements were taken. The post-test measurements included the same tests as the pre-test measurements. A follow-up test was taken 7 days after the measurements. The follow-up test included the same measurements as in the pre-test and post-test phases.

Video Instructed Training Group

"Pre-test" measurements were taken to determine the baseline values of the athletes before the training packages specific to their group. The pre-test measurements included landing error scoring system, knee position error sense, and frontal plane projection angle. After the pretest measurements, 2 training packages with specific instructions were performed for the CSE group. The special instruction given to the CSE group consisted of the following sentence, which included the both internal and external focus of attention; "focus on how hard you push yourself off the ground and how fast you straighten your knees during this push-off". Immediately after the training packages, post-test measurements were taken. The post-test measurements included the same tests as the pre-test measurements. A follow-up test was taken 7 days after the measurements. The follow-up test included the same measurements as in the pre-test and post-test phases.

Verbal Combined Focus Instructed Training Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 24 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Being between the ages of 18-24
  • Becoming a minor volleyball player
  • Volunteers must not have suffered any trunk or lower extremity injuries in the last 6 months before participation in the study.
  • Having a frontal plane projection angle greater than 10° during the single-leg squat test

You may not qualify if:

  • Having experienced a trunk or lower extremity injury in the last 6 months before the date of study
  • Having a history of fracture or dislocation in the lower extremity
  • Having suffered from back pain in the past years
  • Having a musculoskeletal system abnormality
  • Being unable to perform functional tasks (visual, auditory, vestibular or neurological impairment)
  • Being pregnant
  • Having malignancy and metabolic diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Smyrna Sports Club

Izmir, 35220, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Athletic Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Oktay Şenozan, PT

    Bahcesehir University, Graduate Education Institute, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Master of Science Program

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD

    Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Randomization was gender specific. Female participants were randomized to the verbal training group with combined attentional focus instruction (VFIT) and the visual training group with video instruction (VGE) by asking them to draw a paper from a black bag filled with papers with the names of both groups. For male participants, randomization was performed with a different black bag with the same characteristics.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized, single-blind, prospective study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, PT, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2024

First Posted

December 24, 2024

Study Start

November 5, 2024

Primary Completion

December 19, 2024

Study Completion

December 20, 2024

Last Updated

January 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations