Designing a Dyad-Based mHealth Intervention to Improve Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations in Colorectal Cancer Survivors and Their Family Caregivers
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial develops and tests a mobile health (mHealth) intervention to improve adherence to lifestyle recommendations in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and their family caregivers. The current challenge for cancer survivorship is identifying novel approaches to help adhere to the lifestyle recommendations that have been shown to improve symptom burden, health outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The development of a digital health intervention specifically for CRC survivors and family caregivers may improve adherence to the American Cancer Society Nutrition and Physical Activity Guideline for Cancer Survivors and improve family health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
April 9, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.7 years
December 18, 2024
April 5, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Perceived usability (Phase II)
Will be evaluated via the System Usability Scale (SUS), a ten-item questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with a high level of reliability with a coefficient alpha of 0.91.
Up to 1 year
End user's perception of the quality of the mHealth application (Phase II)
Will be assessed using the User Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS), which includes 20 items rated on a 5-point scale and a total of six sections, including engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, subjective quality, and perceived impact.
Up to 1 year
User acceptance of mHealth services (Phase II)
Will be assessed using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which displays how users use and accept technology. The TAM includes 12 items divided into perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
Up to 1 year
Usability (Phase III)
Will be assessed using the SUS, a 10-item scale, with a score ranging from 0 to 100; where a score of \> 68 is considered above average.
Up to 1 year
Acceptability of the program (Phase III)
Will be determined using the Net Promoter Score (NPS), a single-item 11-point scale asking, "How likely is it that you would recommend to a friend or colleague?" using the NPS survey (Reichheld, 2003). Will deem the program acceptable if the average score is \>= 7.
Up to 1 year
End user's perception of the quality of the mHealth application (Phase III)
Will be assessed using the uMARS (Stoyanov, Hides, Kavanagh, \& Wilson, 2016b), which includes 20 items rated on a 5-point scale and a total of six sections, including engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, subjective quality, and perceived impact.
Up to 1 year
Recruitment rate (Phase III)
Will be defined as the percentage of screened and eligible participants who enroll, and determined 50% as an acceptable threshold.
Up to 1 year
Adherence rate (Phase III)
Will be defined as the number of participants who used the digital devices as indicated, and determined 70% as an acceptable threshold.
Up to 1 year
Retention rate (Phase III)
Will be defined as the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the program, and determined 70% as an acceptable threshold.
Up to 1 year
Acceptability of the measurement rate (Phase III)
Will be defined as the number of participants who complete both the baseline and post-assessment measures.
Up to 1 year
Study Arms (3)
Phase I (design)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurvivor-caregiver dyads and SMEs complete semi-structured interview over 60-90 minutes and surveys over 15 minutes for intervention content, format, and feature design and development on study
Phase II (user-experience testing)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDyads complete semi-structured interview and participate in think-aloud sessions over 60-90 minutes and complete surveys over 15 minutes to test the Healthy Buckeyes app on study.
Phase III (pilot study)
EXPERIMENTALDyads use the Healthy Buckeyes app to set goals, self-monitor, elicit social support, reinforcement, time management, relapse prevention, and receive exercise videos and recipes tailored to CRC survivors on study. Dyads also watch three 3 minute videos on strategies for improving healthy lifestyle behaviors weekly, wear a Fitbit and use exercise bands, and receive health coaching over 10 weeks on study. Dyads will be prompted through the app to identify specific ways they will support each other (team activity and team huddle) in meeting their goals throughout the week for 10 weeks on study.
Interventions
Participate in think-aloud sessions
Complete semi-structured interview
Receive caregiver support
Complete surveys
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (18 years of age or older)
- Diagnosis of stage I-III colon or rectal cancer
- Undergone curative-intent complete surgical resection (patients who have received non-operative management for rectal cancer may be eligible)
- Completed treatment (i.e., neo-adjuvant, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation, or surgical resection) at least six months prior
- Own a smartphone with internet access and can receive text messages
- Able to speak, read, and understand English
- Self-report ability to independently engage in physical activity determined by the Physical Activity Readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q), and if indicated obtain physician clearance
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 determined via medical chart review
- Presence of a family caregiver (i.e., informal or formal caregiver) willing support the patient and participate in the study
- Able to provide informed consent
- Any adult that resides in the same household as the patient
- Willing to participate in all aspects of the intervention and in the assessments required for those in the wait-list control condition if applicable
- Medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists; advanced practice providers, registered nurses; dietitians; exercise physiologists; physical therapists, patient navigators and champions/advocates, and social workers with at least 12 months of experience working with CRC survivors
You may not qualify if:
- People with potential contraindications to exercise based on the PAR-Q, for those we are unable to obtain physician clearance
- Planned major surgery during the study period
- Scheduled to receive any form of cancer therapy during study participation
- Concurrent, actively treated other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer or localized prostate cancer treated with surveillance only)
- Self-reported history of severe cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal disease, or joints problems that preclude moderate physical activity (PA)
- Self-reported history of psychiatric disorders that preclude participation in the study intervention or prevent the patient from giving informed consent
- Concurrent participation in another weight loss, PA, or dietary intervention clinical trial
- Currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant during the study period
- living outside the United States (US) during the study period
- Currently a prisoner
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roberto M Benzo, PhD
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2024
First Posted
December 24, 2024
Study Start
May 3, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share