NCT05663203

Brief Summary

This clinical trial studies how well a web-based dyadic intervention works to manage psychoneurological symptoms for patients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers. Patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy experience severe and distressing psychoneurological symptoms that include fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction. When these co-occurring symptoms are undertreated, they negatively affect functional status, survival rates, and quality of life of patients as well as decrease health outcomes of their family caregiver. A critical need exists to develop an effective and novel intervention that focuses on patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers. A web-based dyadic intervention holds great promise to reduce psychoneurological symptoms burden and improve quality of life for patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and advance intervention development and implementation in cancer supportive care and health equity.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
17mo left

Started May 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress68%
May 2023Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Attrition Rate

    Collect attendance records from each dyad before and after modules. The intervention will be considered to be high attrition if \> 80% dyads remain enrolled. Feasibility of study participation will be assessed by calculating retention rates, identifying reasons for refusal and assessing completeness of the data.

    Up to week 8

  • Adherence Rate

    It is determined by high adherence if dyads complete \> 80% of the intervention protocol

    Up to week 8

  • Acceptability Rate

    A survey will be created for this study to assess participants' perceptions of acceptability of the study procedures (\> 80% of participants reporting intervention is considered as high acceptability). Participants' perceptions of acceptability of the study procedures and of the intervention itself will be evaluated by calculating descriptive statistics to summarize responses to the post-intervention surveys as well as post-intervention interviews using content analysis.

    Up to week 8

  • Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory

    Fatigue will be measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI). The MFI is a 20-item self-reported instrument that includes five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. Each dimension includes four items on a 1-5 scale. The total score, ranging from 20 to 100 (higher scores indicating more severe fatigue) is calculated as the sum of the five dimensions. The MFI has well established validity and reliability.

    Up to week 8

  • Patient Health Questionnaire

    Depression will be measured using the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), a well-established valid and reliable self-administered diagnostic measure for depressive disorders in clinical studies. The PHQ-8 asks the number of days in the past 2 weeks the respondent has experienced a variety of depressive symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day); the sum of each item is the total score (0 to 24). Patients with a cutoff score of more than 10, clinically significant depression, will be referred to a clinical psychiatrist for further assistance.

    Up to week 8

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Sleep disturbance will be assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Its validity and reliability have been established in various populations, including patients with cancer. The PSQI consists of 19 items assessing sleep disturbances in seven dimensions (i.e., subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction). Each dimension scores from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty), and the sum of these dimension scores is the global sleep quality (0 to 21). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in sleeping.

    Up to week 8

  • Brief Pain Inventory

    Pain will be assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Participants will rate the intensity of the pain (i.e., now, average, worst) using 0 (none) to 10 (excruciating) numeric rating scales (NRS). In addition, they will provide information on the length of time they are in pain, how often their pain occurs, locations of their pain, quality of the pain, pain's level of interference with function, and their level of pain relief and satisfaction with pain treatment.

    Up to week 8

  • Attentional Function Index

    Attentional Function Index (AFI) consists of 16 items designed to measure cognitive dysfunction. A higher total mean score on a 0 to 10 NRS indicates a greater capacity to direct attention. Total scores are grouped into categories of attentional function (i.e., \<5.0 low function, 5.0 to 7.5 moderate function, \>7.5 high function). In addition, the AFI has three subscales (i.e., effective action, attentional lapses, and interpersonal effectiveness). The AFI has well established reliability and validity.)

    Up to week 8

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Short Form Health Survey

    Up to week 8

Study Arms (1)

Supportive care (CRCWeb intervention)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients and caregivers attend a CRCweb intervention over 8 weeks. Patients and caregivers complete interviews and surveys throughout the trial.

Other: Internet-Based InterventionOther: InterviewOther: Survey AdministrationOther: Electronic Health Record Review

Interventions

Attend CRCWeb intervention

Supportive care (CRCWeb intervention)

Complete interview

Supportive care (CRCWeb intervention)

Complete survey

Supportive care (CRCWeb intervention)

Medical records are reviewed

Supportive care (CRCWeb intervention)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients:
  • Age \>= 18 years
  • Diagnosed with colorectal cancer
  • Life expectancy \> 12 months
  • Receiving active chemotherapy
  • Self-reported at least two psychoneurological symptoms (based on the symptom measures' cutoff scores)
  • Identified primary caregiver (i.e., family members or significant others identified by the patients as their primary source of emotional and physical support)
  • Access to the Internet
  • Fluent in English
  • Caregivers:
  • Age \>= 18 years
  • Primary caregiver
  • Access to the Internet
  • Fluent in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients:
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale \< 50
  • Caregivers:
  • Have severe diseases (e.g., cancer, heart disease)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Lin Y, Porter LS, Chee W, Alese OB, Curseen KA, Higgins MK, Northouse L, Xiao C. A Web-Based Dyadic Intervention to Manage Psychoneurological Symptoms for Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 28;12:e48499. doi: 10.2196/48499.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

Interviews as Topic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Yufen Lin, PhD, RN

    Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Yufen Lin, PhD, RN

CONTACT

Canhua Xiao, PhD, RN

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2022

First Posted

December 23, 2022

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Last Updated

December 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations