NCT06743360

Brief Summary

The orthodontic mini-implants used in the study are temporary screws inserted into the bone to provide anchorage for challenging tooth movements that could not be carried out using the patient's own teeth. They are made of a medical grade titanium alloy (Ti6Al4Va), with a length of 8 mm and a diameter of 1.3 mm. After the completion of the treatment phase requiring specific anchorage, they are removed and disposed of as a medical waste. The insertion of the mini-screw is conditioned by the individual treatment plan and the treatment protocol would not differ from the standard treatment. The aim of the project is to analyze changes in the macrogeometry and wear of the surfaces of retrieved orthodontic micro-implants after their clinical use. Upon completion of clinical tasks, the mini-screws will be removed and retrieved for laboratory phase of the study. The laboratory phase will consist of: microscopic and profilometric examinations, as well as scanning before insertion and after removal of the mini-implants, and a clinical phase: the use of previously scanned and sterilized mini-implants in patients participating in the study.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2025

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

orthodontic mini-implantsskeletal anchorageorthodontic miniscrewsorthodontic mini-screwstemporary anchorage deviceTAD3D superimpostiongeometric changes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Geometric change

    Changes of mini-implant geomtery in micrometers

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Surface analysis

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Test group

Patients seeking for orthodontic treatment with the need of use of the mini-implants

Device: InsertionDevice: Scanning

Interventions

InsertionDEVICE

Twenty orthodontic mini-implants (n=20) (AbsoAnchor SH 1312-08, Dentos, Daegu, South Korea) were randomly chosen (every third screw from a sample of 60) numbered consecutively, and embedded in polivynyl siloxane impression material Variotype heavy putty (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany).

Test group
ScanningDEVICE

After the planned movement is achieved, the mini-implant will be removed and provided to laboratory analysis. All screws were sputtered (0.6µm CaCO₄) and scanned in blue-light technology, using a 3D optical scanner (Atos III, Triple Scan, GOM, Germany) to the nearest 2 micrometres. Due to regularly performed calibration procedures, recommended by the manufacturer, an error study was superfluous. Subsequently, the scans were superimposed using GOM Inspect Software (GOM, Braunschweig, Germany) in order to verify the shape and size repeatability.

Test group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients seeking orthodontic treatment with use of the orthodontic mini-implants

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patient in the active phase of orthodontic treatment with a fixed orthodontic appliance.
  • The individual treatment plan involving tooth movements that require anchorage reinforcement: asymmetric intrusion, space closure through mesialization or distalization.
  • Clinical indications and the possibility of placing a mini-implant in the interradicular space of the maxillary/mandibular alveolar bone (possibility of using the AbsoAnchor SH1312-08 mini-implant).
  • Informed consent of the patient.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individualized treatment plan involving the use of a mini-implant different from the one used in the study.
  • Lack of consent for participation in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Department of Interdisciplinary Dentistry

Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 70111, Poland

Location

Private Dental Practice "Morze Usmiechu"

Świnoujście, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 72600, Poland

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027.

    PMID: 20122438BACKGROUND
  • Jedlinski M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Mazur M, Grocholewicz K, Suarez Suquia P, Suarez Quintanilla D. How Does Orthodontic Mini-Implant Thread Minidesign Influence the Stability?-Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 9;11(18):5304. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185304.

    PMID: 36142951BACKGROUND
  • Chaimanee P, Suzuki B, Suzuki EY. "Safe zones" for miniscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal patterns. Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):397-403. doi: 10.2319/061710-111.1. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

    PMID: 21261491BACKGROUND
  • Eliades T, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos MA, Eliades G. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):10.e1-7; discussion 10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.019.

    PMID: 19121491BACKGROUND
  • Patil P, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Das TK, Kalyanasundaram D. Surface deterioration and elemental composition of retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.034.

    PMID: 25836349BACKGROUND
  • Cho IS, Kim TW, Ahn SJ, Yang IH, Baek SH. Effects of insertion angle and implant thread type on the fracture properties of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):698-704. doi: 10.2319/082812-689.1. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

    PMID: 23216058BACKGROUND
  • Francioli D, Ruggiero G, Giorgetti R. Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 May 15.

    PMID: 20974446BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MalocclusionMalocclusion, Angle Class IMalocclusion, Angle Class II

Interventions

Mutagenesis, InsertionalRadionuclide Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Protein EngineeringGenetic EngineeringGenetic TechniquesInvestigative TechniquesMutationGenetic VariationGenetic PhenomenaMutagenesisDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, Radioisotope

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2024

First Posted

December 19, 2024

Study Start

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion

February 1, 2025

Study Completion

March 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No need.

Locations