Microanalysis of Changes in 3D Geometry of Orthodontic Mini-implants
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The orthodontic mini-implants used in the study are temporary screws inserted into the bone to provide anchorage for challenging tooth movements that could not be carried out using the patient's own teeth. They are made of a medical grade titanium alloy (Ti6Al4Va), with a length of 8 mm and a diameter of 1.3 mm. After the completion of the treatment phase requiring specific anchorage, they are removed and disposed of as a medical waste. The insertion of the mini-screw is conditioned by the individual treatment plan and the treatment protocol would not differ from the standard treatment. The aim of the project is to analyze changes in the macrogeometry and wear of the surfaces of retrieved orthodontic micro-implants after their clinical use. Upon completion of clinical tasks, the mini-screws will be removed and retrieved for laboratory phase of the study. The laboratory phase will consist of: microscopic and profilometric examinations, as well as scanning before insertion and after removal of the mini-implants, and a clinical phase: the use of previously scanned and sterilized mini-implants in patients participating in the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedDecember 24, 2024
December 1, 2024
4 months
December 16, 2024
December 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Geometric change
Changes of mini-implant geomtery in micrometers
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Surface analysis
6 months
Study Arms (1)
Test group
Patients seeking for orthodontic treatment with the need of use of the mini-implants
Interventions
Twenty orthodontic mini-implants (n=20) (AbsoAnchor SH 1312-08, Dentos, Daegu, South Korea) were randomly chosen (every third screw from a sample of 60) numbered consecutively, and embedded in polivynyl siloxane impression material Variotype heavy putty (Kulzer, Hanau, Germany).
After the planned movement is achieved, the mini-implant will be removed and provided to laboratory analysis. All screws were sputtered (0.6µm CaCO₄) and scanned in blue-light technology, using a 3D optical scanner (Atos III, Triple Scan, GOM, Germany) to the nearest 2 micrometres. Due to regularly performed calibration procedures, recommended by the manufacturer, an error study was superfluous. Subsequently, the scans were superimposed using GOM Inspect Software (GOM, Braunschweig, Germany) in order to verify the shape and size repeatability.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients seeking orthodontic treatment with use of the orthodontic mini-implants
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient in the active phase of orthodontic treatment with a fixed orthodontic appliance.
- The individual treatment plan involving tooth movements that require anchorage reinforcement: asymmetric intrusion, space closure through mesialization or distalization.
- Clinical indications and the possibility of placing a mini-implant in the interradicular space of the maxillary/mandibular alveolar bone (possibility of using the AbsoAnchor SH1312-08 mini-implant).
- Informed consent of the patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Individualized treatment plan involving the use of a mini-implant different from the one used in the study.
- Lack of consent for participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Department of Interdisciplinary Dentistry
Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 70111, Poland
Private Dental Practice "Morze Usmiechu"
Świnoujście, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 72600, Poland
Related Publications (7)
Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027.
PMID: 20122438BACKGROUNDJedlinski M, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Mazur M, Grocholewicz K, Suarez Suquia P, Suarez Quintanilla D. How Does Orthodontic Mini-Implant Thread Minidesign Influence the Stability?-Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 9;11(18):5304. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185304.
PMID: 36142951BACKGROUNDChaimanee P, Suzuki B, Suzuki EY. "Safe zones" for miniscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal patterns. Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):397-403. doi: 10.2319/061710-111.1. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
PMID: 21261491BACKGROUNDEliades T, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos MA, Eliades G. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):10.e1-7; discussion 10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.019.
PMID: 19121491BACKGROUNDPatil P, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Das TK, Kalyanasundaram D. Surface deterioration and elemental composition of retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4 Suppl):S88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.034.
PMID: 25836349BACKGROUNDCho IS, Kim TW, Ahn SJ, Yang IH, Baek SH. Effects of insertion angle and implant thread type on the fracture properties of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):698-704. doi: 10.2319/082812-689.1. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
PMID: 23216058BACKGROUNDFrancioli D, Ruggiero G, Giorgetti R. Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 May 15.
PMID: 20974446BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2024
First Posted
December 19, 2024
Study Start
October 10, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No need.