NCT07155018

Brief Summary

This single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial investigates whether micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) can accelerate maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction. The study also evaluates postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale at 1, 3, and 7 days.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 4, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction

    Distance of maxillary canine retraction measured on 3D digital dental models using intraoral scanning.

    Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Level (VAS Score)

    Day 1, Day 3, Day 7 after intervention

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations

EXPERIMENTAL

On the experimental side, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) were performed distal to the maxillary canine under local anesthesia using the Excellerator RT device. Three perforations, each 1.5 mm in diameter and 5 mm deep, were created in the attached gingiva. Canine retraction was then carried out using miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs.

Procedure: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs)

Control: Conventional Retraction

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

On the control side, maxillary canine retraction was performed using miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs without any micro-osteoperforations. The mechanics were identical to the experimental side to ensure comparability.

Procedure: Conventional Canine Retraction

Interventions

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations.

Experimental: Micro-osteoperforations

Maxillary canine retraction with miniscrew anchorage and NiTi closed-coil springs, without micro-osteoperforations

Control: Conventional Retraction

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 16-25 years
  • Patients requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars as part of orthodontic treatment
  • Angle Class I molar relationship
  • No previous orthodontic treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • History of craniofacial trauma or congenital anomalies
  • Systemic or bone-related diseases
  • Current smoking
  • Use of medications affecting bone metabolism

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Can Tho University Hospital

Can Tho, Vietnam

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class I

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lam Nguyen Le, Ph.D.DDS

    Department of Pediatrics Dentistry and Orthodontics, Faculty of Odonto- Stomatology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Only the outcome assessor was blinded to the intervention allocation. Patients and treating clinicians were aware of the intervention side, but the examiner performing digital measurements and statistical analysis did not know which side received MOPs.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a single-blinded, split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Each participant received both interventions: on one side of the maxillary arch, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) were performed distal to the canine, while the contralateral side served as the control with conventional retraction. Outcomes were measured within the same patient, reducing inter-individual variability.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2025

First Posted

September 4, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

April 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

September 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study has a small sample size and the data may compromise patient confidentiality.

Locations