Analgesic Efficacy of Different Liposomal Bupivacaine Doses in the Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
177
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total knee arthroplasty is a commonly performed orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis when conservative management becomes ineffective. TKA is associated with significant acute postoperative pain and many patients experience severe postoperative pain despite the use of multimodal analgesia. Poor acute postoperative pain control impacts rehabilitation, prolongs recovery and increases opioid consumption and chronic post-surgical pain. Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, New Jersey, USA) is a multivesicular formulation of bupivacaine that prolongs drug release and can extend the duration of analgesia. The adductor canal block (ACB) has been shown to reduce pain intensity and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty. The use of liposomal bupivacaine in the adductor canal block has recently been FDA-approved. However, the results of its efficacy from existing clinical trials have been mixed. In addition, the doses in the clinical trials have been different, and the optimal dose for perineural application of liposomal bupivacaine is unclear, including for the adductor canal block. In this project, the investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of different doses of liposomal bupivacaine in the adductor canal block on acute postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption after robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty. The investigators will also assess secondary outcomes including knee functional scores, chronic pain and quality of recovery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2028
November 24, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.8 years
November 29, 2024
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weighted area under curve (AUC) pain score
Pain severity would be rated at rest after surgery using numerical rating scale (NRS) with 0 to 10 where 0=no pain and 10=the worst possible pain
The first 48 hours after surgery when the patient is at rest
Secondary Outcomes (19)
NRS pain scores
from after surgery to postoperative day 7
Oxynorm consumption
Postoperative day 1-7
Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)
Postoperative day (POD) 1-7
Plasma level of bupivacaine and ropivacaine
Blood will be collected during induction, at 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after ACB.
Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-9)
Postoperative day 1
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
ACB using 20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine (SB-ACB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORadductor canal block with 20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine only
ACB using 10ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine with 10 ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine (LB10-ACB)
EXPERIMENTALadductor canal block with 10ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine (133mg) plus 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
ACB using 20ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine only (LB20-ACB)
EXPERIMENTALadductor canal block with 20ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine (266mg)
Interventions
10ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine (133mg) plus 10ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine
20ml 0.5% standard bupivacaine only
20ml 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine (266mg)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-III
- Age 18-80 years old
- Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with robotic surgery
- Able to speak and understand Cantonese or Mandarin or English
- Able to provide informed oral and written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Revision TKA
- Single-stage bilateral TKA
- Complex primary TKA requiring use of stem/augment/constrained liner
- Surgeries with significant intraoperative complications which may alter rehabilitation protocol eg collateral ligament injury, fracture requiring fixation
- Known allergy to opioids, local anaesthetic drugs, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) including COX-2 inhibitors
- History of chronic pain other than chronic knee pain
- History of immunosuppression
- Chronic use of glucocorticoids
- Chronic opioid use (morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketobemidone, methadone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, or meperidine)
- History of congestive heart failure (NYHA 2)
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Impaired renal function (defined as effective glomerular filtration rate \< 30ml/min/1.73m2
- Impaired liver function (defined as plasma bilirubin over 34mol/L; international normalized ratio \[INR\] \>= 1.7, alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] over 100U/L, aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] over 100U/L)
- Coagulopathy (platelet count \<100,000/ml and/or INR \>= 1.5) or the use of anticoagulants (not including aspirin) that precludes the use of adductor canal blocks
- Pre-existing neurological or muscular disorders
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (17)
Culliton SE, Bryant DM, MacDonald SJ, Hibbert KM, Chesworth BM. Validity and Internal Consistency of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000014.
PMID: 29529620RESULTPortenoy R. Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1555-65. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115702.
PMID: 16870080RESULTChan MT, Lo CC, Lok CK, Chan TW, Choi KC, Gin T. Psychometric testing of the Chinese quality of recovery score. Anesth Analg. 2008 Oct;107(4):1189-95. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184b94e.
PMID: 18806027RESULTLam ET, Lam CL, Fong DY, Huang WW. Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):200-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01800.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
PMID: 22128754RESULTLehmann N, Joshi GP, Dirkmann D, Weiss M, Gulur P, Peters J, Eikermann M. Development and longitudinal validation of the overall benefit of analgesia score: a simple multi-dimensional quality assessment instrument. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):511-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq186. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
PMID: 20693179RESULTCohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2013: routledge.
RESULTQuaye A, McAllister B, Garcia JR, Nohr O, Laduzenski SJ, Mack L, Kerr CR, Kerr DA, Razafindralay CN, Richard JM, Craig WY, Rodrigue S. A prospective, randomized trial of liposomal bupivacaine compared to conventional bupivacaine on pain control and postoperative opioid use in adults receiving adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb 1;6(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00226-y.
PMID: 38297390RESULTMalige A, Pellegrino AN, Kunkle K, Konopitski AK, Brogle PJ, Nwachuku CO. Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Blocks Before Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1549-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.073. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
PMID: 35351553RESULTHungerford M, Neubauer P, Ciotola J, Littleton K, Boner A, Chang L. Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Adductor Canal Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Dec;36(12):3915-3921. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
PMID: 34556382RESULTHubler CP, Bevil KM, Greiner JJ, Hetzel SJ, Borden SB, Cios HA. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Standard Bupivacaine in the Adductor Canal for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Orthopedics. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(4):249-255. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20210621-01. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
PMID: 34292820RESULTLv J, Huang C, Wang Z, Ou S. Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia versus isolated adductor canal block in reducing pain and opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520926075. doi: 10.1177/0300060520926075.
PMID: 32776794RESULTLi Y, Li A, Zhang Y. The efficacy of combined adductor canal block with local infiltration analgesia for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13326. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013326.
PMID: 30544393RESULTZuo W, Guo W, Ma J, Cui W. Dose adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia has a synergistic effect than adductor canal block alone in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 11;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1138-5.
PMID: 30971284RESULTIlfeld BM, Eisenach JC, Gabriel RA. Clinical Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered by Infiltration or Peripheral Nerve Block to Treat Postoperative Pain. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):283-344. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003630.
PMID: 33372949RESULTJiang X, Wang QQ, Wu CA, Tian W. Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):294-300. doi: 10.1111/os.12268.
PMID: 27627711RESULTRawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366.
PMID: 26509324RESULTLavand'homme PM, Kehlet H, Rawal N, Joshi GP; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). Pain management after total knee arthroplasty: PROcedure SPEcific Postoperative Pain ManagemenT recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Sep 1;39(9):743-757. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001691. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
PMID: 35852550RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2024
First Posted
December 18, 2024
Study Start
September 4, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Last Updated
November 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11