Optimal Perioperative Pain Control in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Cancer Surgery
LapTAP
Evaluating Optimal Perioperative Pain Management: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Local Anesthetic, Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Alone, and Local Anesthetic Alone in Minimally Invasive Oncologic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a research study to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 different types of routine pain management regimens used during clinically indicated, minimally invasive oncologic (cancer) surgery. This project is considered "Research" and participation is voluntary. Upon enrollment in this study, the research team will collect data from the patient's medical records. The patient will undergo all of the normal testing and procedures required pre-operatively (standard of care). The study team will then randomly assign the patient (like a flip of a coin) to one of three different study arms for pain management during surgery:
- 1.Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LapTAP) with Local Anesthetic (LA)
- 2.Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (LapTAP) only
- 3.Local Anesthetic (LA) only The patient will receive standard pre- and post-operative care according to clinical guidelines (routine care). The study team will collect information from the patient's medical record for the first 24 hours after their surgery and upon discharge. This information will include pain scores, amount of medication required, any side effects the patient may have experienced, and satisfaction with pain control. Participation in the study will end upon discharge from the hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
September 18, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.3 years
November 12, 2024
September 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score
Pain will be measured in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) using Visual Analog Scale. Pain will be scored from zero to ten, with zero being no pain at all and ten being unbearable pain.
Hourly, starting 1 hour post surgery for 24 hours, then at time of hospital discharge (on average 1 week)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Opioid Consumption
up to 24 hours post surgery
Recovery Analgesic Time
up to 24 hours post surgery
Adverse Event(s) Frequency
immediately post surgery up through discharge (on average of 1 week)
Adverse Event(s) Severity
immediately post surgery up through discharge (on average of 1 week)
Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management
At discharge (on average of 1 week)
Study Arms (3)
Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Local Anesthetic
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient would be receiving Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane block in addition to Local Anesthetic per standard of care.
Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane block only
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient would be receiving Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane block without Local Anesthetic per standard of care.
Local Anesthetic only
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient would be receiving Local Anesthetic per standard of care.
Interventions
For local anesthetic administration at port sites, 30 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine is injected around the umbilical port site following the completion of the primary surgical procedure. Additionally, 5 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine is injected around each additional port site to ensure effective local anesthesia.
Surgeon will place 18 gauge needle into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Once the needle is accurately positioned surgeon will inject 15 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine slowly. This procedure is performed bilaterally to ensure comprehensive analgesia. The total volume utilized for the LapTAP block is 30 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients age ≥ 18 - 89
- Patients scheduled for elective (clinically indicated) hepatic, gastric, biliary, pancreatic, gynecologic, colorectal, other GI Minimally invasive oncologic surgery.
- Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study.
- Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I, II, or III.
- Patients undergoing procedures anticipated to last more than 1 hour but less than 8 hours.
- Patients able to understand and self-report pain using the designated pain Visual Analog Scale
You may not qualify if:
- Patients age less than 18 or ≥ 90
- Pre-existing hepatic dysfunction, cirrhosis
- Patients with an ASA classification of IV or higher.
- Patients with chronic pain disorders or on long-term opioid or analgesic therapy.
- Patients with known contraindications to the study drugs or procedures (e.g., allergy to LA or contraindications to LapTAP).
- Patients with cognitive impairments or psychiatric conditions that could interfere with pain assessment or understanding of informed consent.
- Patients unable to understand the language in which consent and study-related information are provided (The study and the study-related information will be in the English Language)..
- Patients who have undergone major surgery within the last 6 months.
- Female patients who are pregnant.
- Patients currently enrolled in another clinical trial that might interfere with the outcome measures of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AHN West Penn Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States
Related Publications (12)
17. https://pain.ucsf.edu/fascial-plane-blocks/transversus-abdominis-plane-tap-block
BACKGROUNDJones JH, Aldwinckle R. Interfascial Plane Blocks and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review. Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Oct 23;13:159-169. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S272694. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33122942BACKGROUNDGuo Q, Li R, Wang L, Zhang D, Ma Y. Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anaesthetic wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):17343-52. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26770326BACKGROUNDHamid HK, Emile SH, Saber AA, Ruiz-Tovar J, Minas V, Cataldo TE. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Sep;231(3):376-386.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
PMID: 32502615BACKGROUNDSiddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Uncles DR, Cheek L, Baig MK. A meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Feb;23(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.05.008.
PMID: 21296242BACKGROUNDMannava S, Hafezi N, Turk F, Colgate C, Askegard-Giesmann J, Markel T, Horn N, Gray B. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block VS. Local Wound Infiltration for Elective Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy in Children: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jan;59(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
PMID: 37863700BACKGROUNDCalle GA, Lopez CC, Sanchez E, De Los Rios JF, Vasquez EM, Serna E, Arango AM, Castaneda JD, Vasquez RA, Gonzalez A, Escobar A, Almanza LA. Transversus abdominis plane block after ambulatory total laparoscopic hysterectomy: randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):345-50. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12351.
PMID: 24575769BACKGROUNDRajanbabu A, Puthenveettil N, Appukuttan A, Asok A. Efficacy of laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block for patients undergoing robotic-assisted gynaecologic surgery: A randomised control trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Oct;63(10):841-846. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_471_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
PMID: 31649397BACKGROUNDEl Hachem L, Small E, Chung P, Moshier EL, Friedman K, Fenske SS, Gretz HF 3rd. Randomized controlled double-blind trial of transversus abdominis plane block versus trocar site infiltration in gynecologic laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):182.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.049. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PMID: 25088860BACKGROUNDGan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29026331BACKGROUNDYe SP, Zhu WQ, Huang ZX, Liu DN, Wen XQ, Li TY. Role of minimally invasive techniques in gastrointestinal surgery: Current status and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):941-952. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.941.
PMID: 34621471BACKGROUNDSmall C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management. Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(2):e70-e80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11477.
PMID: 31903595BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Casey Allen, MD
Allegheny Health Network
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Surgical Oncologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 12, 2024
First Posted
December 13, 2024
Study Start
February 5, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It is not necessary for the scope of the study to share IPD.