NCT06691269

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test photobiomodulation (PBM) with a non-invasive light device for reducing discomfort during dental treatments in children. We plan to conduct a series of three clinical studies in 200 school-aged children requiring routine dental treatment. The first study aims to test if PBM works for tooth and soft tissue by assessing response to cold testing and probing of gums. The second study aims to test if use of PBM on soft tissues before injection reduces discomfort. The third study aims to test if PBM can be used to do simple dental fillings in baby teeth without numbing injection.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
13mo left

Started Jul 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress44%
Jul 2025Jun 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 15, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 7, 2025

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 31, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

photobiomodulationdental analgesiadental anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Study 1- Response to Cold Pulp (Pulp sensibility) testing

    Name of measurement: Response to cold pulp testing. Measurement tool: Child's acknowledgement of cold sensation. A small amount of cold spray (Endo Ice/Ethyl Chloride) will be sprayed onto a cotton pellet, and gently place the cotton pellet on the middle third of the buccal surface of the tooth for a few seconds or until the child indicates a sensation. Child will be asked to raise their hand when they feel a cold sensation. Unit of measurement: Response will be noted (Yes/No), if the cold sensation is felt by the child on application of cold stimulus. Difference in cold pulp testing between PBM and no PBM group.

    during the intervention (application of cold stimuli)

  • Study 1- Anxiety related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  • Study 1- Pain (physician documented) related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  • Study 1- Self-reported Pain related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  • Study 2- Anxiety related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  • Study 2- Pain (physician documented) related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  • Study 2- Self-reported Pain related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  • Study 2- Cooperative behavior related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure

  • Study 3- Anxiety during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  • Study 3- Pain (physician documented) during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  • Study 3- Self-reported Pain during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  • Study 3- Cooperative behavior during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Study 1- Duration of tooth analgesia in PBM group

    baseline and immediately after response is felt

  • Study 1- Duration of soft tissue analgesia

    baseline, immediately after response is felt

Study Arms (6)

PBM- Study 1

EXPERIMENTAL

In PBM group, the selected tooth will receive one burst of light application (20 seconds) before being subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing.

Device: Photobiomodulation

no PBM - Study 1

NO INTERVENTION

In the control (no PBM) group, the selected tooth will be subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing without PBM.

PBM- Study 2

EXPERIMENTAL

PBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)

Device: Photobiomodulation

no PBM- Study 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical benzocaine at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)

Drug: Topical Benzocaine

PBM- Study 3

EXPERIMENTAL

PBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration. Additional bursts may be provided every 20 minutes depending on the length of the procedure and patient-reported discomfort.

Device: Photobiomodulation

no PBM- Study 3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Topical benzocaine/Local infiltration followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration.

Drug: Topical BenzocaineDrug: Local Anesthesia

Interventions

Photomodulation (PBM) is a promising non-tissue penetrating (i.e. minimally invasive) approach for achieving tooth and soft tissue anesthesia/analgesia in dental patients. A patent pending near-infrared laser technology that aims to provide dental analgesia will be used for PBM. This intra-oral PBM device comes with a tip comprising of a series of photonic emitters with specific wavelengths that can go through the tooth structure and bone, blocking the nerve conduction like local anesthetics. Research has shown that one burst of light application (for about 20 second) can provide up to 15-20 minutes of pain relief. Based on existing research PBM does not present a serious risk to health, safety, or welfare of a subject.

Also known as: Low-level light therapy, near-infrared light
PBM- Study 1PBM- Study 2PBM- Study 3

Topical Benzocaine at injection site to reduce discomfort of local infiltration

no PBM- Study 2no PBM- Study 3

Local infiltration using local anesthetics with epinephrine

no PBM- Study 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy children, aged 6-12 years, requiring routine dental treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with uncooperative behavior or signficant medical history

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Pediatric Clinics

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Shrutha SP, Havale R, Aishwarya BG, Raj S, Quazi N, Prasad V, Guttiganur N, Kandalam R. Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep 15;46(5):306-311.

  • Shekarchi F, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Chiniforush N, Mohaghegh S, Haeri Boroojeni HS, Amini S, Biria M. Evaluating the Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Photo-biomodulation Therapy on Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia Injection in Children: A Split-mouth Triple-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Sep;98(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1111/php.13605. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

  • Kulkarni S, George R, Love R, Ranjitkar S. Effectiveness of photobiomodulation in reducing pain and producing dental analgesia: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Sep;37(7):3011-3019. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03590-4. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Toothache

Interventions

Low-Level Light TherapyBenzocaineAnesthesia, Local

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesFacial PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapypara-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Central Study Contacts

Vineet Dhar, BDS, MDS, PhD

CONTACT

Kue-Ling Hsu, DDS, MS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Study Design: This will be a series of three prospective, clinical studies in school-aged children requiring routine dental procedures. Study Population: Healthy children aged 6-12 years old requiring routine dental treatment at the study sites. Separate cohorts will be recruited for each trial after obtaining parental consent.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2024

First Posted

November 15, 2024

Study Start

July 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations