Photobiomodulation and Tooth Analgesia
Evaluation of a Photobiomodulation Device for Dental Analgesia in Pediatric Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test photobiomodulation (PBM) with a non-invasive light device for reducing discomfort during dental treatments in children. We plan to conduct a series of three clinical studies in 200 school-aged children requiring routine dental treatment. The first study aims to test if PBM works for tooth and soft tissue by assessing response to cold testing and probing of gums. The second study aims to test if use of PBM on soft tissues before injection reduces discomfort. The third study aims to test if PBM can be used to do simple dental fillings in baby teeth without numbing injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
July 25, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.4 years
October 31, 2024
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Study 1- Response to Cold Pulp (Pulp sensibility) testing
Name of measurement: Response to cold pulp testing. Measurement tool: Child's acknowledgement of cold sensation. A small amount of cold spray (Endo Ice/Ethyl Chloride) will be sprayed onto a cotton pellet, and gently place the cotton pellet on the middle third of the buccal surface of the tooth for a few seconds or until the child indicates a sensation. Child will be asked to raise their hand when they feel a cold sensation. Unit of measurement: Response will be noted (Yes/No), if the cold sensation is felt by the child on application of cold stimulus. Difference in cold pulp testing between PBM and no PBM group.
during the intervention (application of cold stimuli)
Study 1- Anxiety related to routine gingival probing
Name of the measurement: Assessment of anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure
Study 1- Pain (physician documented) related to routine gingival probing
Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute
pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure
Study 1- Self-reported Pain related to routine gingival probing
Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure
Study 2- Anxiety related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)
Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure
Study 2- Pain (physician documented) related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)
Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute
pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure
Study 2- Self-reported Pain related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)
Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure
Study 2- Cooperative behavior related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)
Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale
pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure
Study 3- Anxiety during restorative procedure
Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure
Study 3- Pain (physician documented) during restorative procedure
Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute
pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure
Study 3- Self-reported Pain during restorative procedure
Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale
pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure
Study 3- Cooperative behavior during restorative procedure
Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale
pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Study 1- Duration of tooth analgesia in PBM group
baseline and immediately after response is felt
Study 1- Duration of soft tissue analgesia
baseline, immediately after response is felt
Study Arms (6)
PBM- Study 1
EXPERIMENTALIn PBM group, the selected tooth will receive one burst of light application (20 seconds) before being subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing.
no PBM - Study 1
NO INTERVENTIONIn the control (no PBM) group, the selected tooth will be subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing without PBM.
PBM- Study 2
EXPERIMENTALPBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)
no PBM- Study 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical benzocaine at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)
PBM- Study 3
EXPERIMENTALPBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration. Additional bursts may be provided every 20 minutes depending on the length of the procedure and patient-reported discomfort.
no PBM- Study 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORTopical benzocaine/Local infiltration followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration.
Interventions
Photomodulation (PBM) is a promising non-tissue penetrating (i.e. minimally invasive) approach for achieving tooth and soft tissue anesthesia/analgesia in dental patients. A patent pending near-infrared laser technology that aims to provide dental analgesia will be used for PBM. This intra-oral PBM device comes with a tip comprising of a series of photonic emitters with specific wavelengths that can go through the tooth structure and bone, blocking the nerve conduction like local anesthetics. Research has shown that one burst of light application (for about 20 second) can provide up to 15-20 minutes of pain relief. Based on existing research PBM does not present a serious risk to health, safety, or welfare of a subject.
Topical Benzocaine at injection site to reduce discomfort of local infiltration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy children, aged 6-12 years, requiring routine dental treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Children with uncooperative behavior or signficant medical history
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Pediatric Clinics
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Related Publications (3)
Shrutha SP, Havale R, Aishwarya BG, Raj S, Quazi N, Prasad V, Guttiganur N, Kandalam R. Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep 15;46(5):306-311.
PMID: 39420491RESULTShekarchi F, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Chiniforush N, Mohaghegh S, Haeri Boroojeni HS, Amini S, Biria M. Evaluating the Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Photo-biomodulation Therapy on Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia Injection in Children: A Split-mouth Triple-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Sep;98(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1111/php.13605. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
PMID: 35122442RESULTKulkarni S, George R, Love R, Ranjitkar S. Effectiveness of photobiomodulation in reducing pain and producing dental analgesia: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Sep;37(7):3011-3019. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03590-4. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
PMID: 35699807RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
November 15, 2024
Study Start
July 7, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07