Droperidol and QTc Interval Changes in ED Patients
Low-Dose Droperidol and Its Association with QTc Interval Changes in Emergency Department Patients
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives To assess the association of low-dose Droperidol administration in the emergency department with changes in the QTc interval. Hypothesis Our study is designed to test the null hypothesis that there will be no clinically significant change in QTc interval after administration of 2.5mg of IV Droperidol during an emergency department visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
ExpectedDecember 17, 2024
December 1, 2024
12 months
December 6, 2024
December 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ECG Evaluation
We plan to conduct ECG evaluation for QT interval both before and after patients are given 2.5 mg of droperidol.
30 minutes after Droperidol is given.
Interventions
2.5 mg
Eligibility Criteria
* The population being studied will be a convenience sample of adult emergency department patients. * Eligibility in the study will be based on the treating physician's decision to have administered droperidol and to obtain an ECG - participation in the study will not affect the patient's care. * The minimum number of study subjects will be 100. * The maximum number of study subjects will be 500. * There will be no use of special subject populations. * Investigators will also track how many eligible patients refuse to participate. (See "Participation Status" on the survey instrument, Data Collection Form) * Written consent will be required for each participant at the top of the survey. (See "Survey Instrument", Data Collection Form) * Patients will be enrolled only once. * Participants will not receive any form of compensation and will not be billed for the additional ECG. * Vulnerable adult populations may be included who are able to give consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to provide consent.
- Administration of droperidol before the first ECG is performed.
- Inability to complete the consent form and questionnaire due to clinical instability, severe pain, or disorientation as determined by a study physician.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CHRISTUS Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Shoreline
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78405, United States
Related Publications (15)
White PF. Droperidol: a cost-effective antiemetic for over thirty years. Anesth Analg. 2002 Oct;95(4):789-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200210000-00001. No abstract available.
PMID: 12351246BACKGROUNDTrinkley KE, Page RL 2nd, Lien H, Yamanouye K, Tisdale JE. QT interval prolongation and the risk of torsades de pointes: essentials for clinicians. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Dec;29(12):1719-26. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.840568. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
PMID: 24020938BACKGROUNDPickham D, Helfenbein E, Shinn JA, Chan G, Funk M, Weinacker A, Liu JN, Drew BJ. High prevalence of corrected QT interval prolongation in acutely ill patients is associated with mortality: results of the QT in Practice (QTIP) Study. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):394-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232db4a.
PMID: 22001585BACKGROUNDNachimuthu S, Assar MD, Schussler JM. Drug-induced QT interval prolongation: mechanisms and clinical management. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2012 Oct;3(5):241-53. doi: 10.1177/2042098612454283.
PMID: 25083239BACKGROUNDJackson CW, Sheehan AH, Reddan JG. Evidence-based review of the black-box warning for droperidol. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jun 1;64(11):1174-86. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060505.
PMID: 17519460BACKGROUNDHaddad PM, Anderson IM. Antipsychotic-related QTc prolongation, torsade de pointes and sudden death. Drugs. 2002;62(11):1649-71. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262110-00006.
PMID: 12109926BACKGROUNDDomino KB, Anderson EA, Polissar NL, Posner KL. Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jun;88(6):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199906000-00032.
PMID: 10357347BACKGROUNDCharbit B, Albaladejo P, Funck-Brentano C, Legrand M, Samain E, Marty J. Prolongation of QTc interval after postoperative nausea and vomiting treatment by droperidol or ondansetron. Anesthesiology. 2005 Jun;102(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200506000-00006.
PMID: 15915019BACKGROUNDCharbit B, Alvarez JC, Dasque E, Abe E, Demolis JL, Funck-Brentano C. Droperidol and ondansetron-induced QT interval prolongation: a clinical drug interaction study. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):206-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817fd8c8.
PMID: 18648229BACKGROUNDAbriel H, Schlapfer J, Keller DI, Gavillet B, Buclin T, Biollaz J, Stoller R, Kappenberger L. Molecular and clinical determinants of drug-induced long QT syndrome: an iatrogenic channelopathy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 Nov 27;134(47-48):685-94. doi: 10.4414/smw.2004.10532.
PMID: 15616901BACKGROUNDCole JB, Lee SC, Martel ML, Smith SW, Biros MH, Miner JR. The Incidence of QT Prolongation and Torsades des Pointes in Patients Receiving Droperidol in an Urban Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 2;21(4):728-736. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47036.
PMID: 32726229BACKGROUNDFortney JT, Gan TJ, Graczyk S, Wetchler B, Melson T, Khalil S, McKenzie R, Parrillo S, Glass PS, Moote C, Wermeling D, Parasuraman TV, Duncan B, Creed MR. A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups. Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):731-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00011.
PMID: 9539593BACKGROUNDHernandez-Rodriguez L, Bellolio F, Cabrera D, Mattson AE, VanMeter D, Grush AE, Oliveira J E Silva L. Prospective real-time evaluation of the QTc interval variation after low-dose droperidol among emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.039. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
PMID: 34959024BACKGROUNDTracz K, Owczuk R. Small doses of droperidol do not present relevant torsadogenic actions: a double-blind, ondansetron-controlled study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;79(4):669-76. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12527.
PMID: 25293524BACKGROUNDWeibel S, Rucker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, Mayer D, Riemer M, Schaefer MS, Raj D, Backhaus I, Helf A, Schlesinger T, Kienbaum P, Kranke P. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
PMID: 33075160BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2024
First Posted
December 10, 2024
Study Start
October 17, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD.