Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Neonatal Lumbar Puncture
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of video-assisted neonatal lumbar puncture consent processes against a conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric lumbar puncture in the pediatric ED. We hypothesize that having a visual aid in addition to the verbal information presented in the consent process will lead to increased parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process. Furthermore, the findings from this study may have broader implications for improving the informed consent process for other medical procedures and interventions in pediatric settings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2025
CompletedJuly 20, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.1 years
July 1, 2025
July 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comprehension efficacy
Efficacy of the video intervention on parents' comprehension compared to the conventional consent discussion of the lumbar puncture procedure. Using the Delphi method, a knowledge survey was designed. The survey consists of 10 questions about the lumbar puncture procedure that are discussed in both the standard consent discussion and in the video. Each question has one correct response. The investigators will compare correct responses (individual questions and aggregate scores) between the two groups. The survey will be given to the parents/caregivers immediately after the procedure informed consent process.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Parental satisfaction
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Video assisted consent
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
Standard consent
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation.
Interventions
The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children, age 0-7 months old who are recommended for lumbar puncture procedure during an ED visit.
- Caregiver fluent in English or Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- Previous enrollment in the study, i.e., the patient has been previously part of the current LP study. This will be confirmed by the study coordinator, PI, or co-I.
- Parent/guardian unwilling to complete surveys
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dell Children's Medical Center
Austin, Texas, 78723, United States
Related Publications (5)
Spencer SP, Stoner MJ, Kelleher K, Cohen DM. Using a Multimedia Presentation to Enhance Informed Consent in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):572-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000513.
PMID: 26221786BACKGROUNDRichardson V. Patient comprehension of informed consent. J Perioper Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1750458913023001-204.
PMID: 23413533BACKGROUNDSherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.
PMID: 24812707BACKGROUNDCOMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):e20161484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1484.
PMID: 27456514BACKGROUNDLeazer RC. Evaluation and Management of Young Febrile Infants: An Overview of the New AAP Guideline. Pediatr Rev. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):127-138. doi: 10.1542/pir.2022-005624.
PMID: 36854834BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Matthew Wilkinson, MD, MPH
The University of Texas at Austin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Project Manager
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2025
First Posted
July 20, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 15, 2024
Study Completion
November 15, 2025
Last Updated
July 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IDP will not be shared to maintain participant confidentiality.