NCT07074925

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of video-assisted neonatal lumbar puncture consent processes against a conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric lumbar puncture in the pediatric ED. We hypothesize that having a visual aid in addition to the verbal information presented in the consent process will lead to increased parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process. Furthermore, the findings from this study may have broader implications for improving the informed consent process for other medical procedures and interventions in pediatric settings.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 15, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 1, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 10, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comprehension efficacy

    Efficacy of the video intervention on parents' comprehension compared to the conventional consent discussion of the lumbar puncture procedure. Using the Delphi method, a knowledge survey was designed. The survey consists of 10 questions about the lumbar puncture procedure that are discussed in both the standard consent discussion and in the video. Each question has one correct response. The investigators will compare correct responses (individual questions and aggregate scores) between the two groups. The survey will be given to the parents/caregivers immediately after the procedure informed consent process.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Parental satisfaction

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

Video assisted consent

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

Other: Video assisted informed consent

Standard consent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation.

Other: Standard consent

Interventions

The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

Video assisted consent

The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.

Standard consent

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Months - 7 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children, age 0-7 months old who are recommended for lumbar puncture procedure during an ED visit.
  • Caregiver fluent in English or Spanish

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous enrollment in the study, i.e., the patient has been previously part of the current LP study. This will be confirmed by the study coordinator, PI, or co-I.
  • Parent/guardian unwilling to complete surveys

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dell Children's Medical Center

Austin, Texas, 78723, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Spencer SP, Stoner MJ, Kelleher K, Cohen DM. Using a Multimedia Presentation to Enhance Informed Consent in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):572-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000513.

    PMID: 26221786BACKGROUND
  • Richardson V. Patient comprehension of informed consent. J Perioper Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1750458913023001-204.

    PMID: 23413533BACKGROUND
  • Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.

    PMID: 24812707BACKGROUND
  • COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):e20161484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1484.

    PMID: 27456514BACKGROUND
  • Leazer RC. Evaluation and Management of Young Febrile Infants: An Overview of the New AAP Guideline. Pediatr Rev. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):127-138. doi: 10.1542/pir.2022-005624.

    PMID: 36854834BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Matthew Wilkinson, MD, MPH

    The University of Texas at Austin

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Project Manager

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2025

First Posted

July 20, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion

November 15, 2024

Study Completion

November 15, 2025

Last Updated

July 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IDP will not be shared to maintain participant confidentiality.

Locations