Chronic Effects of the Use of Instep Weights on Specific Capacities in Soccer Players

NCT06723587 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: RCTPI001
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 42
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The main goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the chronic effects of using instep weights on technical, physical (conditional), and perceptual parameters in amateur male soccer players. The secondary objective will be to propose a training methodology using instep weights to enhance athletic performance. The following hypotheses are formulated based on the objectives outlined previously. Hypothesis 1: the use of instep weights will enhance performance in ball striking speed, change of direction ability, and repeated sprint capacity. Hypothesis 2: the use of instep weights will negatively affect performance in ball striking accuracy and ball control. Hypothesis 3: the use of instep weights will not produce adverse effects on perceived exertion, groin pain or reduce maximal adductor, quadriceps and hamstring muscle contraction values.

Conditions

Soccer; Physical Stress; Physical Performance

Keywords

Performance; Accuracy; Agility; Soccer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

• Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)

  The HAGOS was first described and validated in 2011 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (Thorborg et al., 2011). It reliably assesses a patient's perception of disability, discomfort, or issues related to the hip and/or groin region. In addition to perceived dysfunction, the questionnaire also measures actual disability. HAGOS was designed to evaluate both short-term functional changes, such as those observed week-to-week during therapy, and long-term outcomes, such as the natural progression of a condition. HAGOS consists of six subscales scored from 0 (extreme) to 100 (no existance) hip/groin problems. Scales evaluate: Symptoms; Pain ; Physical Function in Daily Living; Function in Sports and Recreation; Participation in Physical Activities and Quality of Life. With: 7, 10, 5, 8, 2 and 5 items for each subscale respectively. The final measure is a composite outcome measure obtained by summing the values of the 6 subscales

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Subjective perceptual well-being questionnaire measures change: RPE

  Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) using the Borg (Borg, 1982) 0-10 scale (being 0 no exertion and 10 maximal exertion) will also be recorded. Players will respond one simple question: How hard was your session? Each player will complete the 0-to-10 scale without the presence of other players and will not see the values of other participants. Players will be allowed to mark a plus sign (interpreted as 0.5 point) alongside the integer value

  The questionnaire will be administered within the first 15-20 minutes following the conclusion of each training session.

• Ball Striking Accuracy Test

  A precision screen (Nagasawa et al., 2011) measuring 7.3 meters wide by 2.4 meters high will be used to delineate target zones on a regulation football goal. The screen will have four openings (target zones) located in the top corners (Zones A and B) and bottom corners (Zones C and D). Each opening measures 1.5 meters wide by 0.8 meters high. Players will perform two strikes for each target zone in the following sequence: A, B, C, D. Accuracy will be assessed manually. A strike will score a point if the ball passes through the designated opening. Each successful strike scores one point, with a maximum total score of eight points (two successful strikes per zone). Accuracy will also be analyzed by high zones (A and B), low zones (C and D), and individual zones. Participants will be instructed to strike the ball with maximum power and precision. Official match balls used by the team for training and competition will be utilized, inflated to a pressure of 0.6-0.8 bar.

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Ball Striking Velocity Test

  A Radar Stalker ATS II (Stalker®, USA) will be used to record ball velocity. Offering a time precision of 0.01 seconds, a velocity range of 1-1432.3 km/h, and the ability to detect ball motion up to 152.40 meters. Measurements will record the ball's speed in meters per second (m/s) as validated by previous studies (Ferraz et al., 2012; Tomas et al., 2014). The radar will be positioned directly behind the goal, 15 meters from the ball. The striking point will be at the penalty spot, 11 meters from the goal line. Participants will be instructed to strike the ball with maximum power and precision. Immediate feedback on velocity will be provided after each strike to encourage performance consistency or improvement. Official match balls used by the team for training and competition will be utilized, inflated to a pressure of 0.6-0.8 bar. Velocity data will be recorded (km/h) automatically by the radar.

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Change of Direction (COD) and Ball Control

  The test evaluates the player's ability to change direction quickly and efficiently, as well as to control the ball while doing so. To evaluate these variables, the modified Barrow test (Bidaurrazaga et al., 2015) will be used. Players will start the test by positioning the foot they use most efficiently to begin the sprint at the starting point. They will then begin the test voluntarily, without waiting for a starting signal. The test will be performed in two conditions: without a ball and with a ball. Each player will perform the test twice in each condition, and the average result will be recorded. Results will be recorded using ChronoJump Boscosystem® photogates (Barcelona, Spain), with timing measurements conducted using Chronopic and recorded through Chronojump software version 2.2.1. Players will complete the test two times without the ball and two times with the ball, with a 2-minute rest between each attempt. The average values (sec) will be considered and analyzed.

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Repeated Sprint Ability (RSA)

  To replicate the extreme demands of competition in terms of the number, duration, and recovery of sprints, a valid and reliable test (Aziz et al., 2008; Gabbett, 2010) will be used. This test aims to assess the ability of players to repeatedly perform high-intensity sprints with minimal recovery, reflecting the demands placed on athletes during competition. The test will consist of 6-8 sprints of 20 meters each, performed at maximal effort, with 20-second cycles between sprints. After each sprint, players will perform a 10-meter decelerationfollowed by a 10-meter active recovery (jogging). Results will be recorded using ChronoJump Boscosystem® photogates(Barcelona, Spain). The time measurements will be taken using Chronopic and recorded through Chronojump software version 2.2.1. The average values (sec) will be considered and analyzed.

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Adductors Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC)

  MVC test will be used to assess the maximum force exerted by the hip adductors. A Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System(Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force. Two different procedures will be used to test the hip adductors(Esteve et al., 2018): 1. Short Lever Test: resistance will be placed between the knees while the feet are positioned on the examination table. The hip will be in 45-degree flexion. 2. Long Lever Test: resistance will be placed between the ankles, with the hip in neutral position (0° flexion). The maximum isometric force (Newtons;N) will be recorded as the average value of three attempts. For the hip adductor tests, both body mass and the length of the short and long levers (distance in cm between the body's center of mass and the point of resistance) will be measured for each player. Force values will then be normalized based on body weight and lever lengths and reported as N·m/kg.

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Knee extensors Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC)

  The MVC test will be used to assess the maximum force exerted by the quadriceps. This is a valid and reliable test for evaluating the force capacity of the knee extensors (Alshahrani et al., 2023; Mentiplay et al., 2015). A Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System(Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force. To assess the quadriceps (knee extensors), the participant will be seated with the hips and knees flexed at 90°. The dynamometer will be placed on the anterior aspect of the lower leg, just proximal to the ankle joint (Alshahrani et al., 2023; Mentiplay et al., 2015). The maximum isometric force (measured in Newtons, N) will be recorded as the average value of three attempts. For the quadriceps test, the average force (N) from the three attempts will be normalized by body mass (measured in N/kg).

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Knee flexors Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC)

  The MVC test will be used to assess the maximum force exerted by the hamstrings. This is a valid and reliable test for evaluating the force capacity of the knee flexors (Alshahrani et al., 2023; Mentiplay et al., 2015). A Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System(Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette IN, USA) will be used to measure the muscle force. To assess the hamstrings (knee flexors), the participant will also be seated with the hips and knees flexed at 90°. The dynamometer will be positioned on the posterior aspect of the lower leg, proximal to the ankle joint (Alshahrani et al., 2023; Mentiplay et al., 2015). The maximum isometric force (measured in Newtons, N) will be recorded as the average value of three attempts. For the hamstring test, the average force (N) from the three attempts will be normalized by body mass (measured in N/kg).

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

• Body mass

  Players body mass in kg will be measured

  Pre-intervention (first day of week 1), mid-intervention (first day of week 5), and post-intervention (first day of week 9)

Study Arms (2)

Instep weights

EXPERIMENTAL

Instep weight use

Other: Instep weights use

No instep weights

NO INTERVENTION

No instep weight.

Interventions

Instep weights use OTHER

Players will perform their scheduled training sessions while wearing a 150-gram instep weight. The use of instep weights in the intervention group will be introduced progressively and gradually, increasing both the frequency of sessions and the duration of their use. During weeks 1-2, instep weights will be used in one training session per week. During weeks 3-5, will be used in two training sessions per week. And during weeks 6-8, will be used in three training sessions per week. The duration of instep weight usage within each session will increase by 5% weekly, starting at 40% in Week 1 and reaching 75% by Week 8.

Instep weights

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 16 Years - 19 Years
• Sex: male
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• amateur young male soccer player (under federation regulation)
• minimum three years of experience playing soccer
• train 3 days/week and 5 hours/week (minimum)

You may not qualify if:

• Injured players
• Goalkeepers
• Players unable to perform at their best
• Players that will miss more than two training sessions
• Players under medication or using performance enhancement supplements
• Players under 16 years old

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia: lead

Study Sites (1)

University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia

Vic, 08500, Spain

Location

Related Publications (12)

• Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.

  PMID: 7154893 BACKGROUND

• Bidaurrazaga, I., Moreira, H., Lekue, J. A., Badiola, A., Figueiredo, A. J., & María, S. (2015). Applicability of an agility test in young players in the soccer field. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 21(2), 133-138.

  BACKGROUND

• Aziz AR, Mukherjee S, Chia MY, Teh KC. Validity of the running repeated sprint ability test among playing positions and level of competitiveness in trained soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;29(10):833-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038410. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

  PMID: 18401804 BACKGROUND

• Esteve E, Rathleff MS, Vicens-Bordas J, Clausen MB, Holmich P, Sala L, Thorborg K. Preseason Adductor Squeeze Strength in 303 Spanish Male Soccer Athletes: A Cross-sectional Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jan 11;6(1):2325967117747275. doi: 10.1177/2325967117747275. eCollection 2018 Jan.

  PMID: 29349093 BACKGROUND

• Alshahrani MS, Reddy RS. Quadriceps Strength, Postural Stability, and Pain Mediation in Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Analysis with Healthy Controls. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 1;13(19):3110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193110.

  PMID: 37835853 BACKGROUND

• Ferraz R, van den Tillaar R, Marques MC. The effect of fatigue on kicking velocity in soccer players. J Hum Kinet. 2012 Dec;35:97-107. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0083-8. Epub 2012 Dec 30.

  PMID: 23486374 BACKGROUND

• Gabbett TJ. The development of a test of repeated-sprint ability for elite women's soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1191-4. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d1568c.

  PMID: 20386127 BACKGROUND

• Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, McGaw R, Clark RA. Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. eCollection 2015.

  PMID: 26509265 BACKGROUND

• Nagasawa, Y., Demura, S., Matsuda, S., Uchida, Y., & Demura, T. (2011). Effect of differences in kicking legs, kick directions, and kick skill on kicking accuracy in soccer players. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(4), 9.

  BACKGROUND

• Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med. 2011 May;45(6):478-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080937.

  PMID: 21478502 BACKGROUND

• Tomas M, Frantisek Z, Lucia M, Jaroslav T. Profile, correlation and structure of speed in youth elite soccer players. J Hum Kinet. 2014 Apr 9;40:149-59. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0017. eCollection 2014 Mar 27.

  PMID: 25031683 BACKGROUND

• Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research randomizer (Version 4.0) [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2024 Dec 2]. Available from: http://www.randomizer.org

  BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Albert Altarriba-Bartes, PhD

  Lecturer and Researcher

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 2, 2024
• First Posted: December 9, 2024
• Study Start: February 17, 2025
• Primary Completion: May 7, 2025
• Study Completion: May 7, 2025
• Last Updated: June 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Locations

ES (1)