NCT06721975

Brief Summary

This research study is being conducted to assess the ability and efficiency of two laser systems to break up kidney stones during ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for kidney stone treatment.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Aug 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress73%
Aug 2024Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 3, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

laser lithotripsylasernephrolithiasiskidney stone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The amount of energy used per given stone volume

    The primary object is to assess the stone dusting ablation efficiency - efficiency will be defined by amount of laser energy used per stone volume (Joules/mm3)

    From enrollment to the follow up imaging at 6-12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Laser ablation speed (volume of stone/lasing time = mm3/sec)

    From enrollment to the follow up imaging at 6-12 weeks

  • Post-operative complications compared between the two laser systems

    From enrollment to the follow up imaging at 6-12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

p-Tm:YAG laser system

EXPERIMENTAL

This is a new laser system developed by Dornier, the Thulio pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG)

Device: Thulio pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG)

TFL laser system

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The thulium fiber laser (TFL) has demonstrated effectiveness in this procedure.

Device: Thulium Laser Fiber (TFL)

Interventions

A new laser system developed by Dornier, the Thulio pulsed Thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG ) is beginning to be studied in vitro and in vivo. Dornier Thulio p-Tm:YAG may represent an attractive new laser platform, with comparable properties to TFL including decreased retropulsion, smaller dust, and improved ablation efficiency relative to Ho:YAG.

p-Tm:YAG laser system

The thulium fiber laser (TFL) has demonstrated effectiveness in this procedure

TFL laser system

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Solitary renal stone 7 to 20 mm in size or in the case of multiple stones the conglomerate diameter (additive maximal diameter of all stones on axial imaging of computed tomography) of 7-20 mm is required
  • Must be a suitable operative candidate for flexible ureteroscopy per American Urological Association guidelines
  • Must be able to give consent
  • Bilateral ureteroscopy will be permitted but only the first side (per surgeon discretion) will be included in the study
  • Surgeons participating in the study must be urological attending surgeons or fellows with subspecialty training in Endourology

You may not qualify if:

  • Concomitant stones in the ureter
  • Prior ipsilateral upper urinary tract reconstructive procedures or history of ipsilateral ureteral stricture
  • Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis
  • Neurogenic bladder or spinal cord injury
  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated UTI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, San Diego

San Diego, California, 92122, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (28)

  • Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.

    PMID: 25524443BACKGROUND
  • Ventimiglia E, Robesti D, Bevilacqua L, Tondelli E, Oliva I, Orecchia L, Juliebo-Jones P, Pietropaolo A, De Coninck V, Esperto F, Tailly T, Ferretti S, Gauhar V, Somani B, Villa L, Keller EX, Salonia A, Traxer O, Kartalas Goumas I. What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications. World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3301-3308. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04580-z. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

    PMID: 37682286BACKGROUND
  • Ventimiglia E, Pauchard F, Gorgen ARH, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O. How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts. World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):891-896. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03241-9. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PMID: 32462304BACKGROUND
  • Vaddi CM, Ramakrishna P, Ganeshan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, Panda R. The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):191-196. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_60_22. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

    PMID: 35983111BACKGROUND
  • Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Korolev D, Barghouthy Y, Tsarichenko D, Akopyan G, Chinenov D, Ali S, Kozlov V, Mikhailov V, Enikeev D. Prospective Single-Center Study of SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Clinical Data. Urol Int. 2022;106(4):404-410. doi: 10.1159/000516933. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

    PMID: 34134117BACKGROUND
  • Stern KL, Borgert BJ, Wolf JS Jr. Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) for Large Renal Stones: A Multi-Institutional Center Study. J Endourol. 2023 Aug 28;37(11):1179-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0424. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 37639362BACKGROUND
  • Solano C, Corrales M, Panthier F, Candela L, Doizi S, Traxer O. Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios. World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2627-2636. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

    PMID: 37468656BACKGROUND
  • Sierra A, Corrales M, Kolvatzis M, Traxer O. Initial clinical experience with the thulium fiber laser from Quanta System: First 50 reported cases. World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2549-2553. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04096-y. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

    PMID: 35861860BACKGROUND
  • Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A. Temperature Assessment of a Novel Pulsed Thulium Solid-State Laser Compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):853-859. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0803. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

    PMID: 33191783BACKGROUND
  • Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A. Gas Bubble Anatomy During Laser Lithotripsy: An Experimental In Vitro Study of a Pulsed Solid-State Tm:YAG and Ho:YAG Device. J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):1051-1057. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0526. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

    PMID: 33207950BACKGROUND
  • Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R. Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser. World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3651-3656. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

    PMID: 33758959BACKGROUND
  • Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R. In Vitro Dusting Performance of a New Solid State Thulium Laser Compared to Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2021 Feb;35(2):221-225. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0525. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

    PMID: 32799650BACKGROUND
  • Patil A, Reddy N, Shah D, Singh A, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Desai M. High-Power Holmium with MOSES Technology or Thulium Fiber Laser in MiniPerc with Suction: A New Curiosity. J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1348-1354. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0915. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

    PMID: 35331003BACKGROUND
  • Panthier F, Solano C, Chicaud M, Kutchukian S, Candela L, Doizi S, Corrales M, Traxer O. Initial clinical experience with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser from Dornier during RIRS: first 25 cases. World J Urol. 2023 Aug;41(8):2119-2125. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04501-0. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

    PMID: 37414942BACKGROUND
  • Negida A. Sample Size Calculation Guide - Part 6: How to calculate the sample size for a non-inferiority or an equivalence clinical trial. Adv J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 27;4(1):e15. doi: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.302. eCollection 2020 Winter. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31938784BACKGROUND
  • Kwok JL, Ventimiglia E, De Coninck V, Corrales M, Sierra A, Panthier F, Pauchard F, Schmid F, Hunziker M, Poyet C, Daudon M, Traxer O, Eberli D, Keller EX. Pulsed thulium:YAG laser-ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? Results from a PEARLS analysis. World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2823-2831. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04549-y. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

    PMID: 37587366BACKGROUND
  • Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T. Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1785-1805. doi: 10.1177/0962280216669183. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

    PMID: 27683581BACKGROUND
  • Kraft L, Yilmaz M, Petzold R, Gratzke C, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A. Dusting Efficiency of a Novel Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser vs a Thulium Fiber Laser. J Endourol. 2022 Feb;36(2):259-265. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0441. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

    PMID: 34693738BACKGROUND
  • Kraft L, Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A. In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr;37(3):2071-2078. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03495-8. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

    PMID: 34905141BACKGROUND
  • Korolev D, Akopyan G, Tsarichenko D, Shpikina A, Ali S, Chinenov D, Corrales M, Taratkin M, Traxer O, Enikeev D. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser. Urolithiasis. 2021 Oct;49(5):485-491. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01258-2. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

    PMID: 33655346BACKGROUND
  • Huusmann S, Lafos M, Meyenburg I, Muschter R, Teichmann HO, Herrmann T. Tissue effects of a newly developed diode pumped pulsed Thulium:YAG laser compared to continuous wave Thulium:YAG and pulsed Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3503-3508. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03634-4. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

    PMID: 33728503BACKGROUND
  • Haas CR, Knoedler MA, Li S, Gralnek DR, Best SL, Penniston KL, Nakada SY. Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):374-383. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003050. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

    PMID: 36621994BACKGROUND
  • Flight L, Julious SA. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials. Pharm Stat. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1716. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

    PMID: 26604186BACKGROUND
  • Enikeev D, Grigoryan V, Fokin I, Morozov A, Taratkin M, Klimov R, Kozlov V, Gabdullina S, Glybochko P. Endoscopic lithotripsy with a SuperPulsed thulium-fiber laser for ureteral stones: A single-center experience. Int J Urol. 2021 Mar;28(3):261-265. doi: 10.1111/iju.14443. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

    PMID: 33258271BACKGROUND
  • Corrales M, Traxer O. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: laser showdown (Ho:YAG vs thulium fiber laser). Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):179-184. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000971.

    PMID: 35013078BACKGROUND
  • Bergmann J, Rosenbaum CM, Netsch C, Gross AJ, Becker B. First Clinical Experience of a Novel Pulsed Solid-State Thulium:YAG Laser during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 29;12(7):2588. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072588.

    PMID: 37048670BACKGROUND
  • Azilgareeva, C., Taratkin, M., Petov, V., Korolev, D., Akopyan, G., Dymov, A., et al. (2022). Prospective randomized comparison of SP TFL and Ho:YAG in RIRS for kidney stones: a single-center study. Eur. Urol. 81, S1722-S1723. doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(22)01252-0.

    BACKGROUND
  • Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. Epub 2016 May 27.

    PMID: 27238616BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney CalculiNephrolithiasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Kidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisUrinary CalculiMale Urogenital DiseasesCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patient will be randomized to one of the following two groups: 1. p-Tm:YAG laser system 2. TFL laser system
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Urology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Posted

December 6, 2024

Study Start

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations