NCT06720142

Brief Summary

Mg OSTEOCRETE is a bone substitute used to fill a defect in bone caused by excision of a tumor, orthopaedic hardware that has become loosened, or a trauma-related condition. The aim of this study is to determine the amount of time it takes for bone to heal after treatment with Mg OSTEOCRETE, and to better understand the efficacy of this treatment through clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
23mo left

Started Mar 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
Mar 2025Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 6, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 17, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 17, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 17, 2028

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

bone defectbone substituteosteocrete

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to complete bone remodeling

    To determine the time to complete bone remodeling after injection of a magnesium-based bone graft substitute (Mg OSTEOCRETE™), as determined by Hounsfield Units on computed tomography (CT) scan.

    Pre-operatively through one year after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Survey of patient-reported outcomes and safety and efficacy of OSTEOCRETE

    Pre-operatively through one year after surgery

Study Arms (3)

Bone void following bone tumor resection

Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

Bone defect caused by aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants

Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

Bone defect caused by trauma-related condition

Patients are being targeted because they have already agreed to receive OSTEOCRETE as part of standard clinical care. They will complete surveys, blood draws to test for magnesium levels, and low-dose CT scans at various post-operative timepoints.

Device: Mg OSTEOCRETE as a bone void filler

Interventions

Patients will be treated with Mg OSTEOCRETE as per standard clinical care to fill defects in bone left by bone tumor resection

Bone void following bone tumor resection

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This study will include patients who are 18 years or older and receive Mg OSTEOCRETE™ as bone void filler as a component of their treatment.

You may qualify if:

  • years of age and older on the day of surgery
  • has received or will receive Mg OSTEOCRETE as a component of their treatment at this institution in accordance with Instructions for Use for the implanted product
  • Mg OSTEOCRETE is indicated for one of the following reasons:
  • as a bone void filler following bone tumor resection, or;
  • as an augment for defects causing aseptic loosening of orthopaedic implants, or;
  • to help substitute bone for trauma-related conditions

You may not qualify if:

  • any contraindication as per Instructions for Use for Mg OSTEOCRETE

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Wu F, Wei J, Guo H, Chen F, Hong H, Liu C. Self-setting bioactive calcium-magnesium phosphate cement with high strength and degradability for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2008 Nov;4(6):1873-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.06.020. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

    PMID: 18662897BACKGROUND
  • Zhang Z., Yang Z., Chen Z., et al. A study on bone cement containing magnesium potassium phosphate for bone repair. Cogent Biol 2018;4(1):1487255. Doi: 10.1080/23312025.2018.1487255.

    BACKGROUND
  • Waselau M, Samii VF, Weisbrode SE, Litsky AS, Bertone AL. Effects of a magnesium adhesive cement on bone stability and healing following a metatarsal osteotomy in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2007 Apr;68(4):370-8. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.4.370.

    PMID: 17397291BACKGROUND
  • Gulotta LV, Kovacevic D, Ying L, Ehteshami JR, Montgomery S, Rodeo SA. Augmentation of tendon-to-bone healing with a magnesium-based bone adhesive. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):1290-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314396. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

    PMID: 18319348BACKGROUND
  • Yoshizawa S, Brown A, Barchowsky A, Sfeir C. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater. 2014 Jun;10(6):2834-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

    PMID: 24512978BACKGROUND
  • Diaz-Tocados JM, Herencia C, Martinez-Moreno JM, Montes de Oca A, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Vergara N, Blanco A, Steppan S, Almaden Y, Rodriguez M, Munoz-Castaneda JR. Magnesium Chloride promotes Osteogenesis through Notch signaling activation and expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08379-y.

    PMID: 28798480BACKGROUND
  • Pernaa K, Koski I, Mattila K, Gullichsen E, Heikkila J, Aho A, Lindfors N. Bioactive glass S53P4 and autograft bone in treatment of depressed tibial plateau fractures - a prospective randomized 11-year follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2011;21(2):139-48. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v21.i2.40.

    PMID: 22043972BACKGROUND
  • Russell TA, Leighton RK; Alpha-BSM Tibial Plateau Fracture Study Group. Comparison of autogenous bone graft and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2057-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01191.

    PMID: 18829901BACKGROUND
  • Heikkila JT, Kukkonen J, Aho AJ, Moisander S, Kyyronen T, Mattila K. Bioactive glass granules: a suitable bone substitute material in the operative treatment of depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures: a prospective, randomized 1 year follow-up study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 Apr;22(4):1073-80. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4272-0. Epub 2011 Mar 23.

    PMID: 21431354BACKGROUND
  • Hofmann A, Gorbulev S, Guehring T, Schulz AP, Schupfner R, Raschke M, Huber-Wagner S, Rommens PM; CERTiFy Study Group. Autologous Iliac Bone Graft Compared with Biphasic Hydroxyapatite and Calcium Sulfate Cement for the Treatment of Bone Defects in Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 5;102(3):179-193. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00680.

    PMID: 31809394BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bone NeoplasmsWounds and Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, MD, PhD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Shreya Halur, BS

CONTACT

Santiago A Lozano-Calderon, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon/Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2024

First Posted

December 6, 2024

Study Start

March 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 17, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 17, 2028

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations