NCT06716541

Brief Summary

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) remain common and are associated with higher morbidity in liver transplant recipients and liver graft failure. Anastomotic biliary strictures are the most common biliary strictures after LT. Today, the gold standard for treatment remains endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with either multiple plastic stenting (MPS) or fully covered metal stents. These methods have disadvantages such as the need for repeated ERCP procedures, high costs or the risk of migration. Biodegradable stents (BDS) are a novel type of stents made from various synthetic polymers or their copolymers, which are now being used in a variety of medical fields, including the pancreatobiliary tract.The use of biodegradable stents has shown good potential in the treatment of benign biliary strictures. However, overall data on their endoscopic use in liver transplant recipients, particularly in the treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures, are scarce. Most studies have either been in animal models, using percutaneously implanted stents, or in non-transplanted patients. There are no randomised controlled trials investigating their use in LT patients. Based on the available evidence, the use of BDS in the treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients appears to be a promising technique that may be as effective as the standard treatment with MPS, but may reduce the number of ERCP procedures and eliminate the risk of migration. The aim of this randomised prospective study is to compare the difference in rates of anastomotic stricture resolution between the active (BDS) and control (MPS) groups to demonstrate non-inferiority of the biodegradable stents. Outcomes will be classified as complete resolution (no significant stricture at the anastomotic site on imaging and resolution of cholestasis), significant response (relative stricture and resolution of cholestasis) or failure (persistent stricture and/or persistent cholestasis). Secondary outcomes are technical feasibility, immediate and late complications.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
21mo left

Started Nov 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Nov 2024Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2024

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 3, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Persisting anastomotic stricture resolution

    Rate of resolution of the anastomotic stricture as confirmed by Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination within 12 months since the initial procedure and persistence of the resolution (confirmed by MRCP) 6 months after the initial resolution. Resolution of anastomotic stricture is defined as all of the following simultaneously: * no need of further restenting * residual narrowing of lumen less than 20%) * alkaline phosphatase (ALP) below two times the upper limit of normal (unless a cause of the increase other than the anastomotic stricture is identified)

    12+6 months

  • Number of ERCPs

    The total number of ERCPs required for the stricture resolution

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Initial anastomotic stricture resolution

    12 months

  • Technical feasibility

    12 months

  • Safety

    12 months

  • Number of stents placed

    12 months

  • Duration of stenting

    12 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with biodegradable stents

EXPERIMENTAL

Initially, a single biodegradable stent is used for treatment of an anastomotic biliary stricture. If needed, this may be followed by usage of another biodegradable stent or plastic stents.

Procedure: ERCP implantation of a biodegradable stentProcedure: ERCP implantation of plastic stents

Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with multiple plastic stents in

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Multiple plastic stents are used for treatment of an anastomotic biliary stricture.

Procedure: ERCP implantation of plastic stents

Interventions

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of a biodegradable stent to treat anastomotic biliary stricture (possibly combined with removal of previous plastic stents).

Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with biodegradable stents

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of a plastic stent or multiple stents to treat anastomotic biliary stricture (possibly combined with removal of previous plastic stents).

Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with biodegradable stentsManagement of anastomotic biliary strictures with multiple plastic stents in

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Liver transplant recipients
  • Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis
  • Anastomotic biliary stricture (cholestasis unexplained by other causes and/or liver biopsy showing altered biliary drainage and/or anastomotic stricture on MRCP)
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Hepaticojejunoanastomosis
  • Physical and/or psychological inability to understand the aims of the research and to adequately cooperate
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Prague, 140 21, Czechia

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Tomas Hucl, Prof

    Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Tomas Hucl, Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chairman, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Posted

December 4, 2024

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations