Biodegradable Stents in Liver Transplant RecipIents for Treatment of Biliary Anastomotic Strictures
BRILLIANT
Biodegradable Stents Versus Plastic Stents for Treatment of Biliary Anastomotic Strictures in Liver Transplant RecipIents
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) remain common and are associated with higher morbidity in liver transplant recipients and liver graft failure. Anastomotic biliary strictures are the most common biliary strictures after LT. Today, the gold standard for treatment remains endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with either multiple plastic stenting (MPS) or fully covered metal stents. These methods have disadvantages such as the need for repeated ERCP procedures, high costs or the risk of migration. Biodegradable stents (BDS) are a novel type of stents made from various synthetic polymers or their copolymers, which are now being used in a variety of medical fields, including the pancreatobiliary tract.The use of biodegradable stents has shown good potential in the treatment of benign biliary strictures. However, overall data on their endoscopic use in liver transplant recipients, particularly in the treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures, are scarce. Most studies have either been in animal models, using percutaneously implanted stents, or in non-transplanted patients. There are no randomised controlled trials investigating their use in LT patients. Based on the available evidence, the use of BDS in the treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures in liver transplant recipients appears to be a promising technique that may be as effective as the standard treatment with MPS, but may reduce the number of ERCP procedures and eliminate the risk of migration. The aim of this randomised prospective study is to compare the difference in rates of anastomotic stricture resolution between the active (BDS) and control (MPS) groups to demonstrate non-inferiority of the biodegradable stents. Outcomes will be classified as complete resolution (no significant stricture at the anastomotic site on imaging and resolution of cholestasis), significant response (relative stricture and resolution of cholestasis) or failure (persistent stricture and/or persistent cholestasis). Secondary outcomes are technical feasibility, immediate and late complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 4, 2024
November 1, 2024
3.2 years
November 25, 2024
December 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Persisting anastomotic stricture resolution
Rate of resolution of the anastomotic stricture as confirmed by Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination within 12 months since the initial procedure and persistence of the resolution (confirmed by MRCP) 6 months after the initial resolution. Resolution of anastomotic stricture is defined as all of the following simultaneously: * no need of further restenting * residual narrowing of lumen less than 20%) * alkaline phosphatase (ALP) below two times the upper limit of normal (unless a cause of the increase other than the anastomotic stricture is identified)
12+6 months
Number of ERCPs
The total number of ERCPs required for the stricture resolution
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Initial anastomotic stricture resolution
12 months
Technical feasibility
12 months
Safety
12 months
Number of stents placed
12 months
Duration of stenting
12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with biodegradable stents
EXPERIMENTALInitially, a single biodegradable stent is used for treatment of an anastomotic biliary stricture. If needed, this may be followed by usage of another biodegradable stent or plastic stents.
Management of anastomotic biliary strictures with multiple plastic stents in
ACTIVE COMPARATORMultiple plastic stents are used for treatment of an anastomotic biliary stricture.
Interventions
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of a biodegradable stent to treat anastomotic biliary stricture (possibly combined with removal of previous plastic stents).
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of a plastic stent or multiple stents to treat anastomotic biliary stricture (possibly combined with removal of previous plastic stents).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Liver transplant recipients
- Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis
- Anastomotic biliary stricture (cholestasis unexplained by other causes and/or liver biopsy showing altered biliary drainage and/or anastomotic stricture on MRCP)
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Hepaticojejunoanastomosis
- Physical and/or psychological inability to understand the aims of the research and to adequately cooperate
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Prague, 140 21, Czechia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tomas Hucl, Prof
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chairman, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2024
First Posted
December 4, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11