NCT06709105

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of an exercise program combined with Kinesio Taping (KT) and sham KT on clinical parameters in pregnant women with low back pain. A total of 40 participants were included in the study, 20 in the experimental and 20 in the control groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roland Morris Quality of Life Questionnaire and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used as data collection tools. The experimental group received KT and an exercise program, while the control group received sham KT and exercise program.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 10, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 20, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 21, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

KinesiotapingLow Back PainPregnancy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analog scale (VAS)

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) has been widely used in numerous studies to assess the intensity of pain and is considered a reliable and valid tool. It measures subjectively perceived pain on a scale resembling a 0-10 cm ruler, with one end representing no pain and the other indicating the most severe pain.

    up to 30 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pittsburgh sleep quality index

    up to 30 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Kinesiotape application

EXPERIMENTAL

The application was performed using 5 cm x 5 m kinesio tape material. After preparing the standing patient in terms of clothing and skin readiness, the patient was asked to lean forward. To adhere the tape to the right paravertebral region, the lower end of the tape was first adhered 7 cm below the sacroiliac joint at the level of the paravertebral muscles. Then, while the patient was leaning forward, a slight rotation to the left was requested, and in this position, the tape was adhered upwards along the paravertebral muscles without any tension. When applying the tape to the left paravertebral region, the same procedure was mirrored as on the right, with the tape again applied without any tension. The third tape was applied while the patient was standing upright and leaning slightly forward, placed over the sacroiliac joints and parallel to the floor, stretching the tape by 25%.

Other: Kinesiotape

Sham group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham Kinesio taping was applied to the patients in the control group. In this sham protocol, Kinesio bands were attached between the 12th rib on both sides and the corresponding sacroiliac joint, passing over the paravertebral muscles without employing any specific banding technique. The third tape was adhered between both sacroiliac joints, also without any adhesive technique. Patients were inquired about any discomfort and informed that the tapes would remain in place until the second session.

Other: Sham (no implant)

Interventions

The application was performed using 5 cm x 5 m kinesio tape material. After preparing the standing patient in terms of clothing and skin readiness, the patient was asked to lean forward. To adhere the tape to the right paravertebral region, the lower end of the tape was first adhered 7 cm below the sacroiliac joint at the level of the paravertebral muscles. Then, while the patient was leaning forward, a slight rotation to the left was requested, and in this position, the tape was adhered upwards along the paravertebral muscles without any tension. When applying the tape to the left paravertebral region, the same procedure was mirrored as on the right, with the tape again applied without any tension. The third tape was applied while the patient was standing upright and leaning slightly forward, placed over the sacroiliac joints and parallel to the floor, stretching the tape by 25%.

Kinesiotape application

Sham Kinesio taping was applied to the patients in the control group. In this sham protocol, Kinesio bands were attached between the 12th rib on both sides and the corresponding sacroiliac joint, passing over the paravertebral muscles without employing any specific banding technique. The third tape was adhered between both sacroiliac joints, also without any adhesive technique. Patients were inquired about any discomfort and informed that the tapes would remain in place until the second session.

Sham group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • week pregnant women without neurologic deficits
  • Females with mechanical low back pain
  • VAS of at least 3

You may not qualify if:

  • High-risk pregnant women with twin pregnancy
  • Placenta previa
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Threatened preterm delivery
  • Orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases
  • Radiculopathy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Muhammet Şahin Elbastı

Elâzığ, Firat University, 23119, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

Athletic Tapesalicylhydroxamic acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BandagesEquipment and SuppliesOrthotic DevicesOrthopedic EquipmentSurgical Equipment

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Departmant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2024

First Posted

November 29, 2024

Study Start

April 10, 2024

Primary Completion

July 20, 2024

Study Completion

August 20, 2024

Last Updated

November 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations