Effect of Kinesiotaping on Pain,Edema and Kinesiophobia in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Investigation of the Effect of Kinesiotaping on Pain, Swelling and Kinesiophobia in Patients Diagnosed With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients will be divided into 2 groups according to the random numbers table, and both groups will receive a conventional physical therapy and rehabilitation program and nutritional support. Afterwards, edema-reducing kinesiotaping will be applied to one group. The applied kinesio tape will remain on the patient for 5 days and will be taped again after 2 days without tape. In this way, taping will be done 3 times in total, once a week for 3 weeks. During this period, patients will continue their routine physical therapy program and measurements will be taken by the same researcher in the 1st week of treatment and 3 weeks later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2024
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
1 month
February 7, 2024
March 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Resting pain
The resting pain level of the patients will be measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).A score between 0 and 10 will be determined by the patient, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain level.
Beginning, week 3 and week 6
Edema
The patients will be physically examined and their wrist circumference and metacarpal circumference will be measured in centimeters.
Beginning, week 3 and week 6
Kinesiophobia
Kinesiophobia will be assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. A score above 37 in the test is defined as an indicator of a high level of kinesiophobia.
Beginning, week 3 and week 6
Study Arms (2)
Kinesiotaping group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be divided into 2 groups according to the random numbers table, and both groups will receive a conventional physical therapy and rehabilitation program and nutritional support. Afterwards, edema-reducing kinesiotaping will be applied to one group.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will be divided into 2 groups according to the random numbers table, and both groups will receive a conventional physical therapy and rehabilitation program and nutritional support.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy Ability to be included in a physical therapy program
You may not qualify if:
- Hemiplegia Malignancy Polyacrylamide allergy Open wound in the area to be applied
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Fischer SGL, Zuurmond WWA, Birklein F, Loer SA, Perez RSGM. Anti-inflammatory treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.07.020. Epub 2010 Aug 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 20692766BACKGROUNDÇeliker R, Güven Z, Aydoǧ T, et al. Kinezyolojik bantlama tekniǧi ve uygulama alanlari. Turkiye Fiz Tip ve Rehabil Derg. 2011;57(4):225-235.
BACKGROUNDRoelofs J, van Breukelen G, Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen MHW, Goossens M, Thibault P, Boersma K, Vlaeyen JWS. Norming of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and various countries. Pain. 2011 May;152(5):1090-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.028.
PMID: 21444153BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deniz Bulut, A.professor
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
May 20, 2024
Primary Completion
June 20, 2024
Study Completion
December 20, 2024
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share