NCT06704243

Brief Summary

Allogeneic Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative option for patients with both malignant and non-malignant hematological disorders. There appears to be unique experiences that adolescents and young adults (AYA) face when undergoing transplant. There is literature to suggest that peer support for young adults is associated with improvements in mental health including greater happiness, self-esteem and effective coping, as well as reductions in depression, loneliness and anxiety. Our primary objective is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of an AYA peer support program for patients undergoing Allo-HSCT. Our secondary objective is to explore the impact of the AYA peer support program on sense of support/connectivity, anxiety, and depression.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 24, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 7, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 7, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 25, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 31, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

peer supportadolescents and young adults

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

    The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the feasibility of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater feasibility of the intervention.

    at 6 months

  • Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.

    at 6 months

  • Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

    The Intervention Appropriate Measure (IAM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the appropriateness of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater appropriateness of the intervention.

    at 6 months

  • Post-intervention Qualitative interviews

    Post-intervention qualitative interviews with participants will also explore their perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, including suggestions for improvement of the intervention. These semi-structured interviews will also help explore participant's opinions related to program length, time, usefulness, and delivery.

    at 6 months

  • Intervention usage

    Intervention usage (i.e. proportion of sessions attended by each participant) will be calculated based on attendance lists for each session collected by the session facilitators. Reasons for non-attendance or early drop-out from a session will be collected, but this is optional for participants.

    at 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Social Connectedness

    Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  • Anxiety

    Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

  • Depressive Symptoms

    Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Study Arms (1)

Peer Support

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention will be a monthly online AYA peer support group (1 hour) that will run for six months via Microsoft Teams.

Behavioral: Peer Support

Interventions

Peer SupportBEHAVIORAL

The intervention will be a monthly online AYA peer support group (1 hour) that will run for six months via Microsoft Teams. In an effort to evaluate a patient-driven "real-world" intervention, the support group has been designed with the following features: 1) participants will be asked to commit for a six month period, but are able to miss sessions if necessary; and, 2) each session will be facilitated by a Nurse Practitioner and Social Worker from the Allo-HSCT program, but the topics of discussion will be determined by the AYA participants present at each session. Participants in the group will then be invited to share their thoughts and experiences about these topics, with as much information as they feel comfortable.

Peer Support

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 39 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age
  • \>3 months post Allo-HSCT
  • any malignant /non-malignant indication for Allo-HSCT

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Non-English speaking

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Lee, R. M., Robbins, S. B., & Hill, C. E. (1995). Measuring Belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance Scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsLeukemia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Samantha Mayo, RN PhD

    University Health Network, Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinician Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2024

First Posted

November 26, 2024

Study Start

May 24, 2024

Primary Completion

February 7, 2025

Study Completion

February 7, 2025

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations