Peer Support Group for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Peer Support Group for AYA Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Allogeneic Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative option for patients with both malignant and non-malignant hematological disorders. There appears to be unique experiences that adolescents and young adults (AYA) face when undergoing transplant. There is literature to suggest that peer support for young adults is associated with improvements in mental health including greater happiness, self-esteem and effective coping, as well as reductions in depression, loneliness and anxiety. Our primary objective is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of an AYA peer support program for patients undergoing Allo-HSCT. Our secondary objective is to explore the impact of the AYA peer support program on sense of support/connectivity, anxiety, and depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 7, 2025
CompletedJanuary 6, 2026
December 1, 2025
9 months
October 25, 2024
December 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the feasibility of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater feasibility of the intervention.
at 6 months
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.
at 6 months
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
The Intervention Appropriate Measure (IAM) revised to evaluated the AYA peer support program comprises 4-items regarding the respondent's perceptions of the appropriateness of the intervention. Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Scale value is computed by averaging responses and ranges from 1-5. Higher values indicate greater appropriateness of the intervention.
at 6 months
Post-intervention Qualitative interviews
Post-intervention qualitative interviews with participants will also explore their perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, including suggestions for improvement of the intervention. These semi-structured interviews will also help explore participant's opinions related to program length, time, usefulness, and delivery.
at 6 months
Intervention usage
Intervention usage (i.e. proportion of sessions attended by each participant) will be calculated based on attendance lists for each session collected by the session facilitators. Reasons for non-attendance or early drop-out from a session will be collected, but this is optional for participants.
at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Social Connectedness
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Anxiety
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Depressive Symptoms
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Study Arms (1)
Peer Support
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention will be a monthly online AYA peer support group (1 hour) that will run for six months via Microsoft Teams.
Interventions
The intervention will be a monthly online AYA peer support group (1 hour) that will run for six months via Microsoft Teams. In an effort to evaluate a patient-driven "real-world" intervention, the support group has been designed with the following features: 1) participants will be asked to commit for a six month period, but are able to miss sessions if necessary; and, 2) each session will be facilitated by a Nurse Practitioner and Social Worker from the Allo-HSCT program, but the topics of discussion will be determined by the AYA participants present at each session. Participants in the group will then be invited to share their thoughts and experiences about these topics, with as much information as they feel comfortable.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- \>3 months post Allo-HSCT
- any malignant /non-malignant indication for Allo-HSCT
You may not qualify if:
- \- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDWeiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
PMID: 28851459BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDLee, R. M., Robbins, S. B., & Hill, C. E. (1995). Measuring Belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance Scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samantha Mayo, RN PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinician Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2024
First Posted
November 26, 2024
Study Start
May 24, 2024
Primary Completion
February 7, 2025
Study Completion
February 7, 2025
Last Updated
January 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share