NCT06703619

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the predictive utility of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score in determining outcomes among patients with altered mental status admitted to the emergency room. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the FOUR Score provide a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes than the GCS Score? Are there specific patient subgroups where one score is more effective than the other? Participants will: Undergo assessment of mental status using both the FOUR Score and the GCS Score during their emergency room admission. Have their clinical outcomes monitored during their hospital stay.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 3, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

GCSFOUR scoreCOMA

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • In hospital mortality

    Mortality (death) during hospitalization

    average of 10 days through discharge

  • Accuracy Assessment of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

    Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): Range 3-15; higher scores indicate better neurological status.

    the first 12 hours after ER admission

  • Accuracy Assessment of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score

    Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score: Range 0-16; higher scores indicate better neurological status.

    the first 12 hours after ER admission

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Length of Hospitalization

    average of 10 days through discharge

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will include adult patients (aged 18 years and above) presenting to the emergency room with altered mental status due to various underlying conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, or central nervous system infections. Participants will be selected from a tertiary care hospital emergency room where comprehensive medical and neurological assessments are routinely conducted. This population is expected to represent a diverse range of clinical presentations and severities of altered consciousness, making it suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).

You may qualify if:

  • Patients admitted to the emergency room with altered mental status.
  • Patients were assessed using both the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score upon admission.
  • Patients whose clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care) are available for follow-up and analysis.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with incomplete or missing data on FOUR and/or GCS assessments.
  • Patients who leave against medical advice (LAMA) or are discharged before outcome data can be collected.
  • Patients with pre-existing neurological conditions that might independently influence outcomes (e.g., severe dementia, long-standing neurodegenerative diseases).
  • Patients in whom resuscitative measures were initiated but unsuccessful before scoring could be performed.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

College of Medicine - Al-Nahrain University

Baghdad, Iraq

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Fischer M, Ruegg S, Czaplinski A, Strohmeier M, Lehmann A, Tschan F, Hunziker PR, Marsch SC. Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R64. doi: 10.1186/cc8963. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

  • Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):585-93. doi: 10.1002/ana.20611.

  • Segatore M, Way C. The Glasgow Coma Scale: time for change. Heart Lung. 1992 Nov-Dec;21(6):548-57.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Hasan Azeez Al-Hamadani, Professor of Neurology

    College Of Medicine - Nahrain University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Posted

November 25, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

July 1, 2025

Study Completion

July 3, 2025

Last Updated

July 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations