Comparison Between GCS and FOUR Scores
GCS/FOUR
Comparative Evaluation of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score and Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Altered Mental Status Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare the predictive utility of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score in determining outcomes among patients with altered mental status admitted to the emergency room. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the FOUR Score provide a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes than the GCS Score? Are there specific patient subgroups where one score is more effective than the other? Participants will: Undergo assessment of mental status using both the FOUR Score and the GCS Score during their emergency room admission. Have their clinical outcomes monitored during their hospital stay.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 3, 2025
CompletedJuly 9, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.2 years
November 20, 2024
July 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
In hospital mortality
Mortality (death) during hospitalization
average of 10 days through discharge
Accuracy Assessment of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): Range 3-15; higher scores indicate better neurological status.
the first 12 hours after ER admission
Accuracy Assessment of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score
Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score: Range 0-16; higher scores indicate better neurological status.
the first 12 hours after ER admission
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Length of Hospitalization
average of 10 days through discharge
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will include adult patients (aged 18 years and above) presenting to the emergency room with altered mental status due to various underlying conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, or central nervous system infections. Participants will be selected from a tertiary care hospital emergency room where comprehensive medical and neurological assessments are routinely conducted. This population is expected to represent a diverse range of clinical presentations and severities of altered consciousness, making it suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted to the emergency room with altered mental status.
- Patients were assessed using both the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score upon admission.
- Patients whose clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care) are available for follow-up and analysis.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with incomplete or missing data on FOUR and/or GCS assessments.
- Patients who leave against medical advice (LAMA) or are discharged before outcome data can be collected.
- Patients with pre-existing neurological conditions that might independently influence outcomes (e.g., severe dementia, long-standing neurodegenerative diseases).
- Patients in whom resuscitative measures were initiated but unsuccessful before scoring could be performed.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
College of Medicine - Al-Nahrain University
Baghdad, Iraq
Related Publications (3)
Fischer M, Ruegg S, Czaplinski A, Strohmeier M, Lehmann A, Tschan F, Hunziker PR, Marsch SC. Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R64. doi: 10.1186/cc8963. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
PMID: 20398274RESULTWijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005 Oct;58(4):585-93. doi: 10.1002/ana.20611.
PMID: 16178024RESULTSegatore M, Way C. The Glasgow Coma Scale: time for change. Heart Lung. 1992 Nov-Dec;21(6):548-57.
PMID: 1447002RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hasan Azeez Al-Hamadani, Professor of Neurology
College Of Medicine - Nahrain University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2024
First Posted
November 25, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 3, 2025
Last Updated
July 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share