NCT06702397

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare surgical outcomes (intra and post-operative complications) and sperm retrieval rates between conventional microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE - Group A) and testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE - Group B) in adult males with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2022

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2024

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

November 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Positive sperm retrieval

    Number of sperm retrieval

    immediately after the surgery

  • Histology

    Normal testicular biopsy or Hypospermatogenesis or Germ cell arrest or Sertoli cell-only syndrome or Seminiferous tubule hyalinization or CIS or Immature testis

    immediately after the surgery

  • Johnsen score

    Number according to Johnsen score

    immediately after the surgery

  • Sperm vials stored

    Number

    immediately after the surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Operative time

    immediately after the surgery

  • Complications

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (2)

Microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE) - Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A longitudinal incision of 3cm was made along the scrotal raphe using a scalpel. Surgical dissection proceeded layer by layer. The testis was separated from the surrounding dartos and luxated outside the scrotal sac. A longitudinal incision was made in the tunica vaginalis to allow complete exposure of the tunica albuginea. Two Vicryl 2-0 traction sutures were placed 0.5 cm cranially and caudally to the testicular equatorial line, which was subsequently incised with a scalpel for 3/4 of the testicular circumference. In M-TESE, through the operating microscope, a direct examination of the testicular parenchyma was performed under magnification (20-25x). Multiple testicular specimens were excised. The same procedure is performed on the contralateral side, where instead of the operating microscope, the surgeon uses surgical loupes for magnification (3.5 - 5x).

Device: Microscope

Testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE) - Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A longitudinal incision of 3cm was made along the scrotal raphe using a scalpel. Surgical dissection proceeded layer by layer. The testis was separated from the surrounding dartos and luxated outside the scrotal sac. A longitudinal incision was made in the tunica vaginalis to allow complete exposure of the tunica albuginea. Two Vicryl 2-0 traction sutures were placed 0.5 cm cranially and caudally to the testicular equatorial line, which was subsequently incised with a scalpel for 3/4 of the testicular circumference. In M-TESE, through the operating microscope, a direct examination of the testicular parenchyma was performed under magnification (20-25x). Multiple testicular specimens were excised. The same procedure is performed on the contralateral side, where instead of the operating microscope, the surgeon uses surgical loupes for magnification (3.5 - 5x).

Device: Surgical loupes

Interventions

The microscope provides a direct examination of the testicular parenchyma at 20-25x magnification.

Microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE) - Group A

Surgical loupes offer magnification of 3.5-5x.

Testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE) - Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult males
  • Diagnosis of non obstructive azoospermia who required m-TeSE.

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of signed written informed consent
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Obstructive azoospermia
  • Genetic anomalies (e.g., Klinefelter syndrome, Kallmann syndrome, Y chromosome microdeletions, CFTR mutations)
  • Previous testicular biopsies/surgical sperm retrieval
  • Personal history of malignant testicular tumor
  • Unilateral cryptorchidism
  • Varicocele
  • Previous chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatments
  • Monorchidism

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Molinette - AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Turin, 10126, Italy

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Chen ML, Buncke GM, Turek PJ. Narrative review of the history of microsurgery in urological practice. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1780-1791. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1441.

    PMID: 33968665BACKGROUND
  • Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1099-103.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1136. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

    PMID: 26263080BACKGROUND
  • Flannigan R, Bach PV, Schlegel PN. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):745-752. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.07.

    PMID: 28904907BACKGROUND
  • Li H, Chen LP, Yang J, Li MC, Chen RB, Lan RZ, Wang SG, Liu JH, Wang T. Predictive value of FSH, testicular volume, and histopathological findings for the sperm retrieval rate of microdissection TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2018 Jan-Feb;20(1):30-36. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_17.

    PMID: 28361811BACKGROUND
  • Pozzi E, Raffo M, Negri F, Boeri L, Sacca A, Belladelli F, Cilio S, Ventimiglia E, d'Arma A, Pagliardini L, Vigano P, Pontillo M, Luciano R, Colecchia M, Montorsi F, Alfano M, Salonia A. Anti-Mullerian hormone predicts positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia-findings from a multi-centric cross-sectional study. Hum Reprod. 2023 Aug 1;38(8):1464-1472. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead125.

    PMID: 37322566BACKGROUND
  • Tournaye H, Liu J, Nagy PZ, Camus M, Goossens A, Silber S, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Correlation between testicular histology and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection using testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1996 Jan;11(1):127-32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019004.

    PMID: 8671174BACKGROUND
  • Boeri L, Palmisano F, Preto M, Sibona M, Capogrosso P, Franceschelli A, Ruiz-Castane E, Sarquella-Geli J, Bassas-Arnau L, Scroppo FI, Sacca A, Gentile G, Falcone M, Timpano M, Ceruti C, Gadda F, Trost L, Colombo F, Rolle L, Gontero P, Montorsi F, Sanchez-Curbelo J, Salonia A, Montanari E. Sperm retrieval rates in non-mosaic Klinefelter patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction: What expectations do we have in the real-life setting? Andrology. 2020 May;8(3):680-687. doi: 10.1111/andr.12767. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

    PMID: 31999885BACKGROUND
  • Ostad M, Liotta D, Ye Z, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):692-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00322-7.

    PMID: 9763095BACKGROUND
  • Pozzi E, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Palmisano F, Preto M, Sibona M, Franceschelli A, Ruiz-Castane E, Sarquella-Geli J, Bassas-Arnau L, Scroppo FI, Gentile G, Falcone M, Timpano M, Ceruti C, Gadda F, Colombo F, Rolle L, Gontero P, Montorsi F, Sanchez-Curbelo J, Montanari E, Salonia A. Rates of hypogonadism forms in Klinefelter patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Andrology. 2020 Nov;8(6):1705-1711. doi: 10.1111/andr.12843. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

    PMID: 32558292BACKGROUND
  • Vieira M, Bispo de Andrade MA, Santana-Santos E. Is testicular microdissection the only way to retrieve sperm for non-obstructive azoospermic men? Front Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 23;4:980824. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.980824. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 36303631BACKGROUND
  • Serletti JM, Deuber MA, Guidera PM, Reading G, Herrera HR, Reale VF, Wray RC Jr, Bakamjian VY. Comparison of the operating microscope and loupes for free microvascular tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Feb;95(2):270-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199502000-00006.

    PMID: 7824606BACKGROUND
  • Boeri L, Bebi C, Dente D, Greco E, Turetti M, Capece M, Cocci A, Cito G, Preto M, Pescatori E, Ciampaglia W, Scroppo FI, Falcone M, Ceruti C, Gadda F, Franco G, Deho F, Palmieri A, Rolle L, Gontero P, Montorsi F, Montanari E, Salonia A. Outcomes and predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed classic TESE: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int J Impot Res. 2022 Dec;34(8):795-799. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00487-8. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

    PMID: 34743195BACKGROUND
  • Falcone M, Boeri L, Timpano M, Cirigliano L, Preto M, Russo GI, Peretti F, Ferro I, Plamadeala N, Gontero P. Combined Trifocal and Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction Enhances Sperm Retrieval Rate in Low-Chance Retrieval Non-Obstructive Azoospermia. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 13;11(14):4058. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144058.

    PMID: 35887821BACKGROUND
  • Schlegel PN, Su LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997 Aug;12(8):1688-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1688.

    PMID: 9308794BACKGROUND
  • Schoysman R, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal L, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, van Roosendaal E, Schoysman D. Pregnancy after fertilisation with human testicular spermatozoa. Lancet. 1993 Nov 13;342(8881):1237. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92217-h. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7901551BACKGROUND
  • Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f.

    PMID: 1351601BACKGROUND
  • Zhao H, Xu J, Zhang H, Sun J, Sun Y, Wang Z, Liu J, Ding Q, Lu S, Shi R, You L, Qin Y, Zhao X, Lin X, Li X, Feng J, Wang L, Trent JM, Xu C, Gao Y, Zhang B, Gao X, Hu J, Chen H, Li G, Zhao J, Zou S, Jiang H, Hao C, Zhao Y, Ma J, Zheng SL, Chen ZJ. A genome-wide association study reveals that variants within the HLA region are associated with risk for nonobstructive azoospermia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012 May 4;90(5):900-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

    PMID: 22541561BACKGROUND
  • Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989 Jul;142(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38662-7.

    PMID: 2499695BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Azoospermia, Nonobstructive

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized multi-center controlled trial comparing microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE - Group A) and testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE - Group B) in adult males with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in terms of surgical outcomes and sperm retrieval rates
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor Mirko Preto

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Posted

November 25, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion

April 30, 2024

Study Completion

April 30, 2024

Last Updated

November 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations