Study Stopped
The study was withdrawn before enrollment due to changes in the scope and timeline following sponsor guidance. The team determined there was insufficient time to conduct the planned pilot testing and will instead focus on refining the intervention.
Suicide Treatment and Recovery in Integrated Behavioral Health (STRIBH)
STRIBH
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The suicide rate has increased 28% over the past two decades while heart disease, diabetes, and cancer mortality has declined. Starting in 2011, new standards have led to improved adoption and reach of suicide risk surveillance in primary and specialty care. Treatment, however, has lagged. Collaborative Care in primary care settings has demonstrated small but significant reductions in suicidal ideation when a recognized psychological treatment model is included but not when Collaborative Care only includes medication management, suggesting that improvements to psychological treatments in Collaborative Care could further improve suicide outcomes. Developed in a series of conferences in Aeschi Switzerland, the "Aeschi Model" based on the clinical narrative has become an established approach to suicide care endorsed by leaders across the suicidology field - including the developers of major evidence-based suicide interventions. With support from the Methods Core, this Exploratory (R34) study of the University of Washington Suicide Care Research Center (SCRC) will co-design and pilot test the "Connections model" that integrates Aeschi Model with Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health with adolescent and young adult patients (age 13-30 years) who do not require immediate crisis intervention. This study will focus on increasing therapeutic alliance - a key proposed mechanism of the Aeschi approach and the SCRC. The aims of this study are to partner with diverse primary care clinics to conduct a pilot test of the Connections model compared to treatment as usual in six primary care clinics to determine (a) usability and acceptability of the intervention components to patients and providers and (b) the components' potential impact on therapeutic alliance and patient and provider self-efficacy, and (c) potential impact on suicidal outcomes. Given the strong theoretical basis for both the Aeschi Model and Collaborative Care, this proposal has the potential to develop a high impact intervention that will both reduce suicide risk and improve therapeutic alliance - potentially without any increase in the quantity of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jun 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
March 19, 2026
March 1, 2026
6 months
November 20, 2024
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Four item scale to measure the acceptability of an intervention
baseline, one month, and two months
System Usability Scale
The System Usability Scale is a 10-item measure of the usability of a tool, and is considered the industry standard for measuring usability in the UCD field. A SUS score of 80 is generally seen as a threshold for a highly usable system.
baseline, one month, and two months
Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale
This measure assesses the frequency of suicidal ideation on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "most or all of the time". Higher scores reflect higher severity and frequency of suicidal ideation.
baseline, one month and two months
Other Outcomes (1)
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS)
baseline, one month and two months
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Condition
EXPERIMENTALTreatment as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Treatment as Usual will be whatever primary care and behavioral health services are standardly implemented for adolescents or young adults experiencing suicidality
The Connections model applies the Aeschi Model of suicide care to Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health by centering the patient's clinical narrative, focusing treatment on the patient's unique drivers of suicide, and maximizing collaboration while maintaining the standards of suicide assessment and management expected by accrediting bodies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age, experiencing suicidal thoughts or attempted suicide in the past year, not requiring immediate crisis care (as determined by the UW Primary Care team), not enrolled in specialty behavioral health treatment, can read one of the 4 most common languages in Seattle (English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese), enrolled in a primary care clinic with an integrated behavioral health provider available to see them, and ability to consent to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- any clinical medical/psychiatric condition, severity of that condition, or life situation that, in the opinion of the primary care or research team, compromises safe and voluntary study participation (e.g., high risk for suicide requiring transfer to higher level of care; physically aggressive, custody conflict)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Washingtonlead
- Kaiser Permanentecollaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katherine A Comtois, PhD, MPH
University of Washington
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All outcomes are completed through surveys so the research team is not blinded, per se, but they are not involved in the participant responses.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2024
First Posted
November 22, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03