NCT06700993

Brief Summary

The suicide rate has increased 28% over the past two decades while heart disease, diabetes, and cancer mortality has declined. Starting in 2011, new standards have led to improved adoption and reach of suicide risk surveillance in primary and specialty care. Treatment, however, has lagged. Collaborative Care in primary care settings has demonstrated small but significant reductions in suicidal ideation when a recognized psychological treatment model is included but not when Collaborative Care only includes medication management, suggesting that improvements to psychological treatments in Collaborative Care could further improve suicide outcomes. Developed in a series of conferences in Aeschi Switzerland, the "Aeschi Model" based on the clinical narrative has become an established approach to suicide care endorsed by leaders across the suicidology field - including the developers of major evidence-based suicide interventions. With support from the Methods Core, this Exploratory (R34) study of the University of Washington Suicide Care Research Center (SCRC) will co-design and pilot test the "Connections model" that integrates Aeschi Model with Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health with adolescent and young adult patients (age 13-30 years) who do not require immediate crisis intervention. This study will focus on increasing therapeutic alliance - a key proposed mechanism of the Aeschi approach and the SCRC. The aims of this study are to partner with diverse primary care clinics to conduct a pilot test of the Connections model compared to treatment as usual in six primary care clinics to determine (a) usability and acceptability of the intervention components to patients and providers and (b) the components' potential impact on therapeutic alliance and patient and provider self-efficacy, and (c) potential impact on suicidal outcomes. Given the strong theoretical basis for both the Aeschi Model and Collaborative Care, this proposal has the potential to develop a high impact intervention that will both reduce suicide risk and improve therapeutic alliance - potentially without any increase in the quantity of care.

Trial Health

45
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Timeline
13mo left

Started Jun 2026

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Jun 2026Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    Four item scale to measure the acceptability of an intervention

    baseline, one month, and two months

  • System Usability Scale

    The System Usability Scale is a 10-item measure of the usability of a tool, and is considered the industry standard for measuring usability in the UCD field. A SUS score of 80 is generally seen as a threshold for a highly usable system.

    baseline, one month, and two months

  • Harkavy-Asnis Suicide Scale

    This measure assesses the frequency of suicidal ideation on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "most or all of the time". Higher scores reflect higher severity and frequency of suicidal ideation.

    baseline, one month and two months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS)

    baseline, one month and two months

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Condition

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Connections model

Treatment as Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Treatment as Usual in Collaborative Care or Integrated Behavioral Health

Interventions

Treatment as Usual will be whatever primary care and behavioral health services are standardly implemented for adolescents or young adults experiencing suicidality

Treatment as Usual

The Connections model applies the Aeschi Model of suicide care to Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health by centering the patient's clinical narrative, focusing treatment on the patient's unique drivers of suicide, and maximizing collaboration while maintaining the standards of suicide assessment and management expected by accrediting bodies.

Experimental Condition

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age, experiencing suicidal thoughts or attempted suicide in the past year, not requiring immediate crisis care (as determined by the UW Primary Care team), not enrolled in specialty behavioral health treatment, can read one of the 4 most common languages in Seattle (English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese), enrolled in a primary care clinic with an integrated behavioral health provider available to see them, and ability to consent to participate.

You may not qualify if:

  • any clinical medical/psychiatric condition, severity of that condition, or life situation that, in the opinion of the primary care or research team, compromises safe and voluntary study participation (e.g., high risk for suicide requiring transfer to higher level of care; physically aggressive, custody conflict)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Suicidal IdeationBehavior

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SuicideSelf-Injurious BehaviorBehavioral Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Katherine A Comtois, PhD, MPH

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
All outcomes are completed through surveys so the research team is not blinded, per se, but they are not involved in the participant responses.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Partnering primary care clinics will recruit study participants and provide them treatment as usual in their Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health program. This will be followed by training in the experimental intervention, the Connections model. Trained clinicians will recruit study participants and provide them with the Connections model in their Collaborative Care or other Integrated Behavioral Health program. This is a pilot study in preparation for a larger stepped wedge or other cluster randomized trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2024

First Posted

November 22, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03