A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral CBD for the Treatment of Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the use of cannabidiol (CBD) capsules as a treatment for musculoskeletal pain. CBD is commonly being used as an over-the-counter treatment for musculoskeletal pain. Clinical trials have demonstrated a pain-relief benefit for hand and wrist osteoarthritis with topical CBD, however patients prefer oral CBD and no clinical trial has been performed to establish efficacy of oral CBD in humans for upper extremity musculoskeletal pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is CBD more effective than placebo at relieving pain for upper extremity musculoskeletal pain ? Is CBD safe for participants with upper extremity musculoskeletal pain? Participants will: take 4 weeks of daily CBD capsules take 4 weeks of daily placebo capsules answer surveys about how they are feeling and functioning. Participants will \[describe the main tasks participants will be asked to do, interventions they'll be given and use bullets if it is more than 2 items\].
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedApril 9, 2025
December 1, 2024
9 months
November 15, 2024
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score
The Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring acute and chronic pain. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score).a validated, self-report
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score - Crossover Condition
The Visual Analog Pain (VAS) Score is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring acute and chronic pain. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score).a validated, self-report
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Normal Function on the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score
The SANE Score is a self-reported subjective measure for measuring percentage of normal function. Possible scores range from 0 (most abnormal) to 100 (normal). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Normal Function on the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Score - Crossover Condition
The SANE Score is a self-reported subjective measure for measuring percentage of normal function. Possible scores range from 0 (most abnormal) to 100 (normal). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10 Score
The PROMIS Global Health-10 is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (most severe impairment) to 20 (best health). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health-10 Score - Crossover Condition
The PROMIS Global Health-10 is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (most severe impairment) to 20 (best health). Change = (Week (4 or 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score
The PROMIS Pain Interference is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score - Crossover Condition
The PROMIS Pain Interference is a validated, self-reported subjective measure for measuring generic health related quality of life. Possible scores range from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Score
The PROMIS UE computer adaptive test is a validated computer adaptive test to assess upper extremity functional status. Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain interference on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Score - Crossover Condition
The PROMIS UE computer adaptive test is a validated computer adaptive test to assess upper extremity functional status. Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain on the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis (AUSCAN) Index
The AUSCAN Index is a 15-item scale measuring pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. Possible scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Pain on the Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis (AUSCAN) Index - Crossover Condition
The AUSCAN Index is a 15-item scale measuring pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. Possible scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in Disability on The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder (QuickDASH)
The QuickDASH is a validated, self-reported 11-item scale measuring disability. Possible scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability. Change = (Week 4 Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4
Change from Baseline in Disability on The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder (QuickDASH) - Crossover Condition
The QuickDASH is a validated, self-reported 11-item scale measuring disability. Possible scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability. Change = (Week 4 Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4
Change from Baseline in perseverance on the Brief Resilience Index (BRI)
The BRI is a validated, self-reported 6-item validated tool to assess for resilience. Possible scores range from 1 (low resilience) to 5 (high resilience). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Change from Baseline in perseverance on the Brief Resilience Index (BRI) - Crossover Condition
The BRI is a validated, self-reported 6-item validated tool to assess for resilience. Possible scores range from 1 (low resilience) to 5 (high resilience). Change = (Week (4, 6) Score - Baseline Score)
Baseline and Week 4, Week 6
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in the Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure
Baseline and Week 4
Change from Baseline in Heart Rate
Baseline and Week 4
Change from Baseline in the Mean Seated Trough Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure
Week 4 and Week 6
Change from Baseline in Heart Rate
Week 4 and Week 6
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Oral CBD
EXPERIMENTALOral CBD 25 mg capsules taken twice each day for 4 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOROral placebo capsules taken twice each day for 4 weeks
Interventions
25 mg capsule twice daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form.
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
- Male or female, aged 18 years or older.
- Daily visual analog pain score \>5/10 and \<9/10.
- Duration of pain for greater than or equal to 3 months.
- Presence of physician-diagnosed musculoskeletal pain in the upper extremities, including bone or joint-related pain, tendon or ligament-related pain, muscle-related pain, or fibromyalgia or physician-diagnosed postoperative pain in a discrete body region, limited to upper extremities.
- For females, must be willing to use an approved form of birth control during this study. Acceptable forms of birth control:
- Norplant
- Sterilization
- IUD (intrauterine device)
- Birth Control Patch
- Depo-Provera
- The following may be used if combined with other birth control methods:
- Condoms
- Diaphragm
- +6 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subject does not speak or read English fluently.
- Subject is blind.
- Severe cardiac, pulmonary, liver and /or renal disease, or any other major organ dysfunction.
- Subject with a history of symptoms (e.g., dizziness, light-headedness, blurred vision, palpitations, weakness, syncope) related to a drop in blood pressure due to postural changes.
- Coumadin use at time of screening.
- History of mental illness.
- Subjects who are incarcerated.
- Subjects who satisfy any DSM-V criteria for current psychiatric illness such as bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, psychosis, substance use disorder or any other psychiatric diagnosis
- Subjects who have used intra-articular corticosteroids 30 days prior to screening.
- History of drug or substance abuse.
- Pre-existing CBD product usage currently (or within the prior 3 months) using recreational or medicinal cannabis, any cannabinoid-based medications, and is unwilling to abstain for the duration of the study.
- Subject has had a corticosteroid injection ≤ 60 days prior.
- Subjects who are unwilling to agree to no opioid medications or topical analgesic medications during the study period.
- Any woman of child bearing potential or male patient's partner unwilling to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception, for example, hormonal contraception, double barrier, intra-uterine device, during the study and for females, through 30 days thereafter, and for males, three months thereafter.
- Any male not willing to avoid donating sperm during the duration of the study treatment period and for three months thereafter.
- +49 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brent DeGeorgelead
- The Plastic Surgery Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Related Publications (13)
Russo E.B., Mathre M.L., Byrne A., Velin R., Bach P.J., Sanchez-Ramos J., et. al.: Chronic cannabis use in the compassionate investigational new drug program: an examination of benefits and adverse effects of legal clinical cannabis. J Cannabis Ther 2002; 2: pp. 3-57.
BACKGROUNDStockings E, Zagic D, Campbell G, Weier M, Hall WD, Nielsen S, Herkes GK, Farrell M, Degenhardt L. Evidence for cannabis and cannabinoids for epilepsy: a systematic review of controlled and observational evidence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;89(7):741-753. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317168. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
PMID: 29511052BACKGROUNDBruni N, Della Pepa C, Oliaro-Bosso S, Pessione E, Gastaldi D, Dosio F. Cannabinoid Delivery Systems for Pain and Inflammation Treatment. Molecules. 2018 Sep 27;23(10):2478. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102478.
PMID: 30262735BACKGROUNDFader L, Scharf Z, DeGeorge BR Jr. Assessment of Medical Cannabis in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Thumb Basal Joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Mar;48(3):257-262.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
PMID: 34893392BACKGROUNDWare MA, Wang T, Shapiro S, Collet JP; COMPASS study team. Cannabis for the Management of Pain: Assessment of Safety Study (COMPASS). J Pain. 2015 Dec;16(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26385201BACKGROUNDHeineman JT, Forster GL, Stephens KL, Cottler PS, Timko MP, DeGeorge BR Jr. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Cannabidiol for the Treatment of Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Jul;47(7):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 May 28.
PMID: 35637038BACKGROUNDMacCallum CA, Russo EB. Practical considerations in medical cannabis administration and dosing. Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Mar;49:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
PMID: 29307505BACKGROUNDArzimanoglou A, Brandl U, Cross JH, Gil-Nagel A, Lagae L, Landmark CJ, Specchio N, Nabbout R, Thiele EA, Gubbay O, The Cannabinoids International Experts Panel; Collaborators. Epilepsy and cannabidiol: a guide to treatment. Epileptic Disord. 2020 Feb 1;22(1):1-14. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1141.
PMID: 32096470BACKGROUNDChen JW, Borgelt LM, Blackmer AB. Cannabidiol: A New Hope for Patients With Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes. Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;53(6):603-611. doi: 10.1177/1060028018822124. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
PMID: 30616356BACKGROUNDMechoulam R, Hanus L. Cannabidiol: an overview of some chemical and pharmacological aspects. Part I: chemical aspects. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002 Dec 31;121(1-2):35-43. doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(02)00144-5.
PMID: 12505688BACKGROUNDBaron EP, Lucas P, Eades J, Hogue O. Patterns of medicinal cannabis use, strain analysis, and substitution effect among patients with migraine, headache, arthritis, and chronic pain in a medicinal cannabis cohort. J Headache Pain. 2018 May 24;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0862-2.
PMID: 29797104BACKGROUNDBrat GA, Agniel D, Beam A, Yorkgitis B, Bicket M, Homer M, Fox KP, Knecht DB, McMahill-Walraven CN, Palmer N, Kohane I. Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018 Jan 17;360:j5790. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5790.
PMID: 29343479BACKGROUNDWolf JM, Atroshi I, Zhou C, Karlsson J, Englund M. Sick Leave After Surgery for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Population-Based Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 May;43(5):439-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.11.019. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
PMID: 29428245BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brent DeGeorge, MD, PhD
University of Virginia Department of Plastic Surgery
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2024
First Posted
November 19, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share