NCT06693466

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of three internationally agreed pain test batteries in patients with Huntington Disease. The pain test batteries are developed to collect data about the facial expression of pain, body movements and vocalization of (non-) painful stimuli, and to collect data for testing the pain inhibition and facilitation. The study population will include 20 patients with genetically confirmed, adult-onset HD, in stage 1 (n=10) and stages 2 - 3 of HD (n = 10).

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jan 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Jan 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

November 18, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Huntington's diseasePainPain processingPain facilitationPain inhibitionPain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The feasibility of a comprehensive experimental design including three different experimental pain protocols in patients with Huntington's Disease

    A screening tool was developed to determine whether the comprehensive experimental design, with three various experimental pain protocols, is feasible in patients with HD. After each assessment, the screening tool will be scored. Each item of the screening tool represents an important part of the experimental pain protocol. A 'cut-off' score ranging from 60% to 80% was adopted for each item, indicating the minimum score to be met to consider as feasible for that specific part of the experimental pain protocol. The comprehension of the instructions, duration and the completion of the study are examples of items which will be evaluated.

    Baseline assessment

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Psychometric properties of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition- 15

    Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  • Overall facial expression of pain in patients with HD

    Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  • Conditioned pain modulation

    Baseline assessment - 15 minutes

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Adult-onset HD stage 1

The adult-onset HD stage 1 group (total function capacity 11-13) include 10 participants. The subjects will be undergo three different pain test batteries .

Other: Facial expression blockOther: Conditioned pain modulation blockOther: Pain facilitation block

Adult-onset HD stage 2-3

The adult-onset HD stage 2-3 group (total function capacity 3-10) include 10 participants. The subjects will be undergo three different pain test batteries .

Other: Facial expression blockOther: Conditioned pain modulation blockOther: Pain facilitation block

Interventions

Data will be collected to assess the facial expression, body movements and vocalization of (non-) painful heat stimuli. The experiment includes individually tailored and randomly administered painful (perceived as moderate pain) and non-painful heat stimuli.

Adult-onset HD stage 1Adult-onset HD stage 2-3

The conditioned pain modulation will be tested according to internationally agreed standards and includes a painful phasic heat (test stimulus) and a painful tonic cold stimulus (conditioning stimulus).

Adult-onset HD stage 1Adult-onset HD stage 2-3

Pain facilitation will be assessed by using painful mechanical pinprick stimuli. The magnitude of pain experienced after a single mechanical pinprick stimulus is compared to that of a train of 10 pinprick stimuli of the same force.

Adult-onset HD stage 1Adult-onset HD stage 2-3

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Genetically and clinically confirmed adult-onset HD patients (AoHD) (clinical onset ≥ 21 years, CAG repeats ≥ 36, Diagnostic Confidence Level \[DCL\] of 4\]), in stage 1 (n=10 \[named as HD 1\]), stage 2 and 3 of HD (n = 10 \[named as HD 2\]), according to the Shoulson-Fahn system. Total Function Capacity (TFC) of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) will be used to define the HD groups: UHDRS-TFC score 11-13 (stage 1), 7-10 (stage 2), 3-6 (stage 3), 1-2 (stage 4) and a score of 0 (stage 5).

You may qualify if:

  • Genetically and clinically confirmed Adult-onset HD patients (≥ 21 years, CAG repeats ≥ 36; DCL of 4).
  • Good general health apart from having HD. Note: Patients with chronic illness (e.g. hypertension) will be eligible if the illness is stable and well-controlled according to the investigator that will not impact the primary objectives of the study.
  • Able to give written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Juvenile and Pediatric Huntington's Disease (age at onset \<21 years).
  • Patients in the late stage of the disease (UDHRS-TFC score \<3).
  • Have medical, psychiatric, or other conditions (other than HD) that, according to the investigator, may compromise the patient's ability to understand the patient information sheet, to give informed consent, to comply with all study requirements, or to perform study assessments.
  • Have a history of (in the past year) or current (ab)use of any drug, alcohol or medication that, in the opinion of the investigator, may seriously interfere with the primary objectives of the study.
  • The presence of a sensorimotor neuropathy or any another disturbance significantly disturbing the somatosensory systems, based on medical history and/or clinical examination, that can interfere with the pain test battery.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Yarnitsky D, Granot M, Nahman-Averbuch H, Khamaisi M, Granovsky Y. Conditioned pain modulation predicts duloxetine efficacy in painful diabetic neuropathy. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1193-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

    PMID: 22480803BACKGROUND
  • Yarnitsky D, Bouhassira D, Drewes AM, Fillingim RB, Granot M, Hansson P, Landau R, Marchand S, Matre D, Nilsen KB, Stubhaug A, Treede RD, Wilder-Smith OH. Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):805-6. doi: 10.1002/ejp.605. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

    PMID: 25330039BACKGROUND
  • Kunz M, Chatelle C, Lautenbacher S, Rainville P. The relation between catastrophizing and facial responsiveness to pain. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.019. Epub 2008 Sep 9.

    PMID: 18783885BACKGROUND
  • Kunz M, de Waal MWM, Achterberg WP, Gimenez-Llort L, Lobbezoo F, Sampson EL, van Dalen-Kok AH, Defrin R, Invitto S, Konstantinovic L, Oosterman J, Petrini L, van der Steen JT, Strand LI, de Tommaso M, Zwakhalen S, Husebo BS, Lautenbacher S. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): A multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta-tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia. Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):192-208. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1477. Epub 2019 Oct 13.

    PMID: 31487411BACKGROUND
  • de Waal MWM, van Dalen-Kok AH, de Vet HCW, Gimenez-Llort L, Konstantinovic L, de Tommaso M, Fischer T, Lukas A, Kunz M, Lautenbacher S, Lobbezoo F, McGuire BE, van der Steen JT, Achterberg WP. Observational pain assessment in older persons with dementia in four countries: Observer agreement of items and factor structure of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition. Eur J Pain. 2020 Feb;24(2):279-296. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1484. Epub 2019 Oct 22.

    PMID: 31520424BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Huntington DiseasePain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Basal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDementiaChoreaDyskinesiasMovement DisordersHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Susanne de Bot, MD Phd

    Leiden University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Gregory Sprenger, Msc

CONTACT

Susanne de Bot, MD, Phd

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2024

First Posted

November 18, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations