The Impact of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia on Return of Bowel Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Ileal Conduit
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) on bowel function recovery after Bricker surgery.This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 72 patients with bladder cancer undergoing elective Bricker surgery, who were randomly assigned to either the ITM group (n=36) or the CEA group (n=36). Postoperatively, patients in both groups received either ITM or CEA for pain management, and postoperative bowel function recovery time, pain scores, PONV, itching, and other indicators were recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2024
CompletedNovember 14, 2024
October 1, 2021
2.8 years
November 11, 2024
November 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bowel function recovery time
12 hours indicates good bowel function, 24 hours indicates good bowel function.
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
pain scores
24 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
ITM group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.
EA group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.
Interventions
Patients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.
Patients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All participants provided informed consent voluntarily
- ASA I-III
You may not qualify if:
- allergies to any anesthetic agents used in this study
- refused to sign the consent form
- uncooperative were deemed ineligible for clinical evaluation
- hypersensitivity to pain
- a history of gastrointestinal disease
- sleep disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xiaguang Duanlead
Study Sites (1)
Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital
Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014010, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Chief of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2024
First Posted
November 14, 2024
Study Start
January 25, 2022
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 14, 2024
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- January 2025-January 2026
- Access Criteria
- Anyone needing IPD information, contact the author at email: alonlord2023@gmail.com
all IPD that underlie results in a publication