NCT06688643

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) on bowel function recovery after Bricker surgery.This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 72 patients with bladder cancer undergoing elective Bricker surgery, who were randomly assigned to either the ITM group (n=36) or the CEA group (n=36). Postoperatively, patients in both groups received either ITM or CEA for pain management, and postoperative bowel function recovery time, pain scores, PONV, itching, and other indicators were recorded.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 25, 2022

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 14, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

November 11, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Bowel functionContinuous epidural analgesia (CEA)intrathecal morphine(ITM)laparoscopic ileal conduit (Bricker)Postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV)Pruritus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • bowel function recovery time

    12 hours indicates good bowel function, 24 hours indicates good bowel function.

    24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • pain scores

    24 hours after surgery

Study Arms (2)

ITM group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.

Device: ITM group

EA group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.

Device: EA group

Interventions

ITM groupDEVICE

Patients in the ITM group underwent intrathecal injection with 0.2 mg morphine after admission to the operating room.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.

ITM group
EA groupDEVICE

Patients in the EA group underwent epidural anesthesia after admission to the operating room. Following successful epidural puncture, 3 ml of 2% lidocaine was administered. Once the block level was confirmed, the epidural analgesia pump was activated, delivering 8 ml/h of 0.1% ropivacaine.Mechanical ventilation was initiated in pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) mode after induction. Ventilator settings (Aestiva; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA) were as follows: tidal volume 6-8 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 cmH2O, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate 16 beats per minute (BPM), and inspired oxygen concentration 41%.

EA group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All participants provided informed consent voluntarily
  • ASA I-III

You may not qualify if:

  • allergies to any anesthetic agents used in this study
  • refused to sign the consent form
  • uncooperative were deemed ineligible for clinical evaluation
  • hypersensitivity to pain
  • a history of gastrointestinal disease
  • sleep disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital

Baotou, Inner Mongolia, 014010, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPruritus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNauseaSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsVomitingSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Manifestations

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy Chief of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2024

First Posted

November 14, 2024

Study Start

January 25, 2022

Primary Completion

November 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

November 14, 2024

Record last verified: 2021-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Time Frame
January 2025-January 2026
Access Criteria
Anyone needing IPD information, contact the author at email: alonlord2023@gmail.com

Locations