Comparison of the Application of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pathways in Radical Cystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Traditional radical cystectomy (RC) is performed transabdominal. However, it often has high postoperative complications. There have been studies on extraperitoneal approach to reduce postoperative complications. Investigators divided participants underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy into two groups (1:1) . One group of participants transabdominal, the other group extraperitoneal. The incidence of complications and PFS/OS at 3, and 5 years were compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 20, 2024
February 1, 2024
9 months
February 3, 2024
February 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complication rate
Complication rate after surgery
through study completion, an average of 1 month, 3 month and 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
OS
5 years after surgery
PFS
5 years after surgery
Study Arms (2)
robit-assist transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy
NO INTERVENTIONrobit-assist radical cystectomy was performed transperitoneal
robit-assist extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy
EXPERIMENTALrobit-assist radical cystectomy was performed extraperitoneal
Interventions
robit-assist laparoscopic radical cystectomy was performed extraperitoneal
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Researchers evaluated patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer or high-risk non-muscular invasive bladder cancer who needed radical cystectomy.
- Willing to accept the operation and meet the surgical index: a) Absolute count of neutrophils≥1.5x109/L; b) Platelets≥100Ă—109/L; c) Hemoglobin≥90g/L; d) International standardized ratio or activationPartial thrombin time≤1.5 Upper limit of normal value (ULN); e) calculated creatinine clearance rate≥1 ml/s; f) Total serum bilirubin≤1.5Ă—ULN; g) AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase≤2.5Ă—ULN; h) Cardiopulmonary function indicates that it can tolerate major abdominal surgery;
- None of the pastHistory of abdominal surgery;
- to 75 years old;
- ECOG physical state 0 or 1;
- voluntarily participate in this experiment, be able to provide a written version of the informed consent, and be able to understand and agree to comply with the requirements of this study and the evaluation schedule;
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to receive radical cystectomy
- Researchers evaluate patients who are unable to tolerate radical cystectomy;
- There is a abdominal history of surgery;
- Have had a large-scale operation or major trauma within 28 days before joining the group;
- Have been vaccinated with live vaccine within 28 days before joining the group;
- Severe chronic or active infection that requires systemic anti-bacterial, antifungal or antiviral treatment within 14 days before joining the group;
- Participating in the rest of the clinical research.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
Related Publications (22)
Lobo N, Afferi L, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Porten S, Psutka SP, Gupta S, Smith AB, Williams SB, Lotan Y. Epidemiology, Screening, and Prevention of Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Dec;5(6):628-639. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
PMID: 36333236BACKGROUNDSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUNDKnowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015 Jan;15(1):25-41. doi: 10.1038/nrc3817.
PMID: 25533674BACKGROUNDWitjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Lorch A, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Veskimae E, Ribal MJ, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
PMID: 32360052BACKGROUNDHaeuser L, Marchese M, Noldus J, Kibel AS, Carvalho F, Preston MA, Cooper Z, Trinh QD, Mossanen M. Association between Operative Time and Short-Term Radical Cystectomy Complications. Urol Int. 2023;107(3):273-279. doi: 10.1159/000522141. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
PMID: 35306500BACKGROUNDParra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol. 1992 Oct;148(4):1140-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36843-x.
PMID: 1404624BACKGROUNDCao Q, Li P, Yang X, Qian J, Wang Z, Lu Q, Gu M. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic re-peritonealization: the technique and initial clinical outcomes. BMC Urol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0424-6.
PMID: 30541538BACKGROUNDKulkarni JN, Gulla RI, Tongaonkar HB, Kashyapi BD, Rajyaguru KB. Radical cystoprostatectomy: an extraperitoneal retrograde approach. J Urol. 1999 Feb;161(2):545-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61946-3.
PMID: 9915445BACKGROUNDZhu YP, Ye DW, Yao XD, Zhang SL, Dai B, Shen YJ, Wang CF. Defining good candidates for extraperitoneal cystectomy: results from random peritoneum biopsies of 136 cases. Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):820-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.057. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
PMID: 23434097BACKGROUNDPark DS, Gong IH, Choi DK, Hwang JH, Kang MH, Oh JJ. A feasibility study of peritoneum preservation in radical cystectomy with extraperitonealization of orthotopic neobladder for invasive high-grade bladder cancer: a preliminary analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Jun;46(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0632-7. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
PMID: 24356919BACKGROUNDDe Nunzio C, Cicione A, Leonardo F, Rondoni M, Franco G, Cantiani A, Tubaro A, Leonardo C. Extraperitoneal radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy in octogenarians. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Sep;43(3):663-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9876-7. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
PMID: 21110093BACKGROUNDJentzmik F, Schostak M, Stephan C, Baumunk D, Lingnau A, Weikert S, Lein M, Miller K, Schrader M. Extraperitoneal radical cystectomy with extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder: a comparison to the transperitoneal technique. World J Urol. 2010 Aug;28(4):457-63. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0476-z. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
PMID: 19777243BACKGROUNDFeng L, Song J, Wu M, Tian Y, Zhang D. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):655-62. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0608.
PMID: 27564274BACKGROUNDRefaai K, Sharafeldin MA, Elabbady A, Sameh W, Thurairaja R, Nair R, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Mohamed E. Perioperative Outcomes of Open Retrograde Extraperitoneal Versus Intracorporeal Robot-assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy in Men: A Dual-center Comparative Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Jun;18(3):e315-e323. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
PMID: 31911120BACKGROUNDKulkarni JN, Agarwal H. Transperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A retrospective study. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Mar-Apr;44(2):296-303. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0441.
PMID: 29219280BACKGROUNDZhao J, Zeng S, Zhang Z, Zhou T, Yang B, Song R, Sun Y, Xu C. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy Versus Extraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy: Is the Extraperitoneal Technique Rewarding? Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Aug;13(4):e271-e277. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
PMID: 25743207BACKGROUNDZhu G, Zhang Z, Zhao K, Yin X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Li C, Sui Y, Li X, Yang H, Xing N, Wang K. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and ileal orthotopic neobladder by a total extraperitoneal approach: Our initial technique and short-term outcomes. Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Sep;63(5):523-530. doi: 10.4111/icu.20220156.
PMID: 36067997BACKGROUNDSoleimani M, Moradkhani E, Masoumi N, Gholivandan J. Extra-Peritoneal versus Trans-Peritoneal Open Radical Cystectomy - Comparison of Two Techniques in Early Post-Operative Complications. Urol J. 2021 Nov 7;18(5):519-524. doi: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.6147.
PMID: 32827149BACKGROUNDYang H, Zhang Z, Zhao K, Zhang Y, Yin X, Zhu G, Lin C, Liu C, Wang Z, Sui Y, Li X, Li C, Wang K. Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy With Preservation of Fertility for the Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma: The First Report of a Reliable Surgical Method. Urology. 2022 Jan;159:241-246. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
PMID: 34653432BACKGROUNDMalinaric R, Mantica G, Balzarini F, Terrone C, Maffezzini M. Extraperitoneal cystectomy with ureterocutaneostomy derivation in fragile patients - should it be performed more often? Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Jun 29;94(2):144-149. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.2.144.
PMID: 35775336BACKGROUNDLi Z, Zhang Z, Ma H, Yao K, Qin Z, Han H, Ye Y, Li Y, Dong P, Jiang L, Tian L, Liu Z, Zhou F. Extraperitonealization of ileal conduit reduces parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(4):162.e17-162.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
PMID: 34920945BACKGROUNDKulkarni JN, Rizvi SJ, Acharya UP, Kumar KS, Tiwari P. Gynecologic-tract sparing extra peritoneal retrograde radical cystectomy with neobladder. Int Braz J Urol. 2008 Mar-Apr;34(2):180-7; discussion 187-90. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000200008.
PMID: 18462516BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Lv qiang, PhD
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2024
First Posted
February 12, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share