Evaluation of Targeted Biopsy Plus Sextant Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Targeted Biopsy Plus Sextant Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different prostate biopsy schemes, including targeted biopsy plus sextant biopsy (3TB+6SB) and combination of targeted biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy (3TB+12SB). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does 3TB+6SB promote the accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer? What's the value of 3TB+6SB in improving the safety of prostate biopsy? Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of 3TB+6SB and combination of 3TB+12SB to explore the efficacy of different prostate biopsy schemes. They will evaluate the safety profile of different prostate biopsy schemes through the complication rates and postoperative quality of life. Participants will: Receive 3TB+6SB or 3TB+12SB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedJune 13, 2025
June 1, 2025
8 months
November 10, 2024
June 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate
csPCa was defined as PCa with a grade group \> 2 or GS ≥ 7. The reference standard was the pathological result.
One month after the biopsy procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The overall complication rate
One week and one month after the biopsy procedure.
The self-reported quality of life after the prostate biopsy
One week and one month after the biopsy procedure.
The operation time of prostate biopsy
During the prostate biopsy procedure.
The PCa detection rate
One month after the biopsy procedure.
The clinically insignificant PCa detection rate
One month after the biopsy procedure.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
3TB+6SB group
EXPERIMENTALFor each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists firstly obtained three-core TB from the lesion within the mpMRI suspicious lesion. Then urologists obtained sextant six-core SB.
3TB+12SB group
EXPERIMENTALFor patients in the 3TB+12SB group, urologists firstly obtained three-core TB from the lesion within the mpMRI suspicious lesion. Then urologists obtained fore-zone 12-core SB.
Interventions
The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. For each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists firstly obtained three-core TB from the lesion within the mpMRI suspicious lesion. Then urologists obtained sextant six-core SB. Each core was placed in an individual container and reported separately in accordance with the Ginsburg scheme. Histology was evaluated by senior uropathologists who were blinded to the imaging findings.
The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position or lithotomy position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. Urologists firstly obtained three-core TB from the lesion within the mpMRI suspicious lesion. Then urologists obtained fore-zone 12-core SB. Each core was placed in an individual container and reported separately in accordance with the Ginsburg scheme. Histology was evaluated by senior uropathologists who were blinded to the imaging findings.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the patient is between 45 and 85 years.
- No previous biopsy.
- Patients with single suspicious lesion, complete multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, qualified image quality control, suspicious lesions, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) of ≥ 3.
- Patients were in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy, including patients with suspicious prostate nodes found by digital rectal examination (DRE), the suspicious lesions found by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) \>10ng/mL, tPSA 4-10ng/mL with free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA) \<0.16 or PSA density (PSAD) \>0.15.
- The prostate biopsy pathological results were complete. The time interval between prostate biopsy and prostate mpMRI examination should not exceed one month.
- Patients with complete clinical information.
You may not qualify if:
- The mpMRI data was unqualified or incomplete.
- Patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or surgery treatment before prostate mpMRI examination or prostate biopsy.
- Patients with previous biopsy.
- Patients with PI-RADS V2.1 of \< 3.
- Patients were not in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy.
- The patient could not cooperate to complete the prostate biopsy.
- The patients or their family members refused to participate in this study.
- Patients with incomplete clinical information.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yi Liu
Peking University First Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate chief physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
June 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06