Evaluation of Transrectal Perilesional Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transrectal Perilesional/Regional Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
380
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different transrectal prostate biopsy schemes, including transrectal perilesional/regional systematic biopsy (PB/RSB) and combination of transrectal systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy (TB+SB). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does transrectal PB/RSB promote the accurate diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer? What's the value of PB/RSB in improving the safety of transrectal prostate biopsy? Researchers will compare the cancer detection rates of transrectal PB/RSB and combination of TB+SB to explore the efficacy of different transrectal prostate biopsy schemes. They will evaluate the safety profile of different transrectal prostate biopsy schemes through the complication rates and postoperative quality of life. Participants will: Receive transrectal PB/RSB or TB+SB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2024
CompletedApril 8, 2025
December 1, 2024
6 months
June 25, 2024
April 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate for PB/RSB and TB+SB
csPCa was defined as PCa with a grade group \> 2 or GS ≥ 7. The reference standard was the pathological result.
One month after the biopsy procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The overall complication rate
One month after the biopsy procedure.
The self-reported quality of life after the prostate biopsy
One month after the biopsy procedure.
The operation time of prostate biopsy
During the prostate biopsy procedure.
The PCa detection rate
One month after the biopsy procedure.
The clinically insignificant PCa detection rate
One month after the biopsy procedure.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transrectal perilesional/regional systematic biopsy (PB/RSB) group
EXPERIMENTALFor each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists obtained nine cores at 5-mm intervals within and around the region of interest (penumbra) through transrectal prostate biopsy. The location of these nine cores depended on the shape and location of the suspicious lesion.
Combination of transrectal systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy (TB+SB) group
EXPERIMENTALFor patients in the TB+SB group, three to five transrectal targeted biopsies from the lesion were performed within and around the predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, followed by fore-zone 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy.
Interventions
The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. For each predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, urologists obtained nine cores at 5-mm intervals within and around the region of interest (penumbra) through transrectal prostate biopsy. The location of these nine cores depended on the shape and location of the suspicious lesion.
The biopsy procedure was conducted by a highly skilled and experienced urologist who specializes in performing prostate biopsies. Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used both before and one day prior to scheduled surgery. Each patient was placed in the left lateral position. The ultrasound equipment used included a color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic instrument (Hitachi HiVision, Philips Epiq 7), transrectal probes, and corresponding puncture needle guns. Color Doppler examination was performed from the base to the apex. Three to five transrectal targeted biopsies from the lesion were performed within and around the predefined mpMRI suspicious lesion, followed by fore-zone 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the patient is between 45 and 85.
- No previous biopsy,
- Patients with single suspicious lesion, complete multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data, qualified image quality control, suspicious lesions, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) of ≥ 4.
- Patients were in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy, including patients with suspicious prostate nodes found by digital rectal examination (DRE), the suspicious lesions found by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or MRI, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) \>10ng/mL, tPSA 4-10ng/mL with free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA) \<0.16 or PSA density (PSAD) \>0.15.
- The prostate biopsy pathological results were complete. The time interval between prostate biopsy and prostate mpMRI examination should not exceed one month.
- Patients with complete clinical information.
You may not qualify if:
- The mpMRI data was unqualified or incomplete.
- Patients had received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, or surgery treatment before prostate mpMRI examination or prostate biopsy.
- Patients with previous biopsy.
- Patients with PI-RADS V2.1 of \< 4.
- Patients were not in accordance with the indication of prostate biopsy.
- The patient could not cooperate to complete the prostate biopsy.
- The patients or their family members refused to participate in this study.
- Patients with incomplete clinical information.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034, China
Related Publications (1)
Deng R, Li D, Wu J, Tian S, Shen Q, Hu S, Shang M, Qiu J, Shang J, Zhou J, Cai L, Liu Y, Gong K. Comprehensive Evaluation of Targeted and Perilesional Biopsy in Biopsy-Naive Patients With Prostate Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging: PERI-PRO Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2025 Dec 22:101097JU0000000000004863. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004863. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41270377DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yi LIU
Peking University First Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate chief physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2024
First Posted
July 1, 2024
Study Start
June 12, 2024
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
November 30, 2024
Last Updated
April 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share