Evaluating Improvised Chest Drainage Techniques in Conflict Zones
Safety and Efficacy of Improvised Chest Tube Drainage in the Absence of Conventional Systems: a Prospective Single-Center Study in Emergency and Conflict Zones in Sudan
1 other identifier
observational
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examines the use of improvised chest drainage systems in managing chest trauma at Wad Madani Teaching Hospital, a low-resource and conflict-affected setting. Due to a shortage of standard chest tubes and underwater seal systems, healthcare providers have adapted by using nasogastric (NG) tubes as chest drains and IV drip sets as makeshift underwater seals. The study aims to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of these improvised methods compared to traditional chest drainage techniques. Primary outcomes will include lung re-expansion success, infection rates, and hospital stay length. By assessing patient outcomes, this study seeks to determine if these adapted techniques can provide a viable alternative for trauma care in resource-limited settings, potentially guiding practices in similar environments globally.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 12, 2024
CompletedJanuary 6, 2025
January 1, 2025
6 months
November 7, 2024
January 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Patients With Successful Lung Re-expansion
The percentage of patients in each group (conventional vs. improvised chest drainage) who achieve full lung re-expansion as confirmed by chest X-ray.
Within 72 hours post-drainage
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of Drainage-Related Infections
Up to 30 days post-procedure
Median Length of Hospital Stay
From admission to discharge (typically within 30 days)
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction Score at Discharge
At discharge (up to 30 days post-procedure)
Study Arms (2)
Standard Treatment Group Label: Conventional Chest Drainage
This group includes patients with chest trauma who receive standard chest drainage using commercial chest tubes and underwater seal systems. This intervention follows established guidelines and protocols for chest drainage in trauma care. Patients in this group serve as the control group for comparing outcomes with those receiving improvised drainage systems.
Improvised Treatment Group Label: Improvised NG Tube Drainage
This group includes patients with chest trauma who receive chest drainage using improvised methods, specifically nasogastric (NG) tubes as chest drains and intravenous (IV) drip sets adapted to function as underwater seals. This alternative intervention is used due to resource constraints and aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of improvised methods in a low-resource, conflict-affected setting
Eligibility Criteria
The study will include adult patients (18 years and75 years) presenting with chest trauma at Wad Madani Teaching Hospital, a low-resource and conflict-affected setting. Patients are eligible if they require chest drainage for conditions such as pneumothorax or hemothorax and are stable enough to undergo the procedure. Due to limited resources, chest drainage methods include both standard and improvised techniques. The study population represents individuals receiving trauma care in a low-resource setting, providing insights into the effectiveness and safety of adapted drainage techniques in resource-constrained environments
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years and older
- Patients presenting with chest trauma requiring chest drainage (e.g., pneumothorax, hemothorax)
- Willingness to provide informed consent to participate in the study -Stable enough to undergo chest X-ray or clinical assessment for lung re- expansion
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with pre-existing severe lung disease or significant comorbidities affecting chest drainage outcomes (e.g., advanced COPD, heart failure)
- Patients with prior chest surgery that may interfere with drainage outcomes
- Individuals with contraindications to chest tube insertion or NG tube placement
- Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wad Madani teaching Hospital
Wad Madani, Al Jazirah, Sudan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hassan Ali Musa, Consultant
University of Gezira, Faculty of medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2024
First Posted
November 12, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 10, 2023
Last Updated
January 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to several considerations. First, the data includes sensitive personal health information, which must be protected to comply with privacy regulations and ethical standards. Additionally, the study is conducted in a low-resource setting, where data management and sharing capabilities may be limited. Ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of participants is paramount, and sharing IPD could compromise these ethical obligations. Finally, the data will be used exclusively for the purpose of this study to inform clinical practice within the context of the local healthcare system, rather than for broader dissemination.